Wordsmith.org: the magic of words

Wordsmith Talk

About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us  

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
#182148 01/29/09 11:50 AM
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,295
Carpal Tunnel
OP Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,295
Yesterdays quote for the day:

The artist brings something into the world that didn't exist before, and he does it without destroying something else. -John Updike, writer (1932-2009)

Both parts of this statement kept me thinking.
It all depends on how widely you take the the meaning “artist” ; “did not exist before” and what you understand by “destroying” .

“artist” and “didn’t exist before” :

A knitter who knits an article from a self invented pattern is an artist if you stick to the statement. Anyone molding something out of clay is an artist. Does it have to be proved something that it did not exist before? Is it verifiable?

Second part of the statement:
“he does it without destroying something else.”

Michelangelo had a lot of mountain parts demolished to bring all these glorifying marble statues into the world. Michelangelo had nightmares about how to get and transport all that marble.
Ivory cutting has been the ruin of many a healthy elephant and ivory rendering animals.
For woodcarving you need to damage the wood.

I think Updike must have had only the writer/poet in mind when he made this statement.
Writers cause relatively little material damage writing books. Although following the expression that the pen is mightier than the sword, who knows. Reputations and believes can be destroyed by a sharp pen.

Is it strictly observed only the singer and spoken word performing artists who can do
without any destroying?



Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 725
old hand
Offline
old hand
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 725
Thought-provoking remarks, BranShea.

I agree with you that some forms of art do seem to destroy something else in the process. But perhaps something of little value was "destroyed" in order to produce a lovlier, more valuable and longer lasting piece of art?

I would guess that two trees were cut down in order manufacture a couple cellos and a few violins. But think of the beauty and pleasure that results from the instruments! In their new form they could last for hundreds of years - how long would the two trees last?

Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,067
old hand
Offline
old hand
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,067
Interestingly, I read just this morning about an art exhibit by an installation artist called Marco Evaristti in the town of Kolding in Denmark where the police were called to shut it down for just this reason. The interactive exhibit consisted of goldfish swimming in kitchen blenders. The public could push the button on the blender if they wanted to. Apparently two goldfish had already become bouillabaisse by the time the animal rights people had complained about it!

Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,154
Z
Zed Offline
Pooh-Bah
Offline
Pooh-Bah
Z
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,154
There is always some idiot that will push the button.

Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,295
Carpal Tunnel
OP Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,295
Originally Posted By: Coffeebean

I would guess that two trees were cut down in order manufacture a couple cellos and a few violins. But think of the beauty and pleasure that results from the instruments! In their new form they could last for hundreds of years - how long would the two trees last?
Of course we can miss a few trees as long as we replant them and let them grow again. I would miss the cello's and violins too.
I looked up Updike and he proves to have been a good quoter in general:
A Life in Quotes
Though I knew his name, I never read any of his books.

Quote:
On reading The Pook's goldfish story, visual artist seem pretty desparate these days. Poor vision, poor philosophy, only big yelps for public attention. Preferebly causing scandals.

Let the music begin.

Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 876
old hand
Offline
old hand
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 876
Originally Posted By: The Pook
Interestingly, I read just this morning about an art exhibit by an installation artist called Marco Evaristti in the town of Kolding in Denmark where the police were called to shut it down for just this reason. The interactive exhibit consisted of goldfish swimming in kitchen blenders. The public could push the button on the blender if they wanted to. Apparently two goldfish had already become bouillabaisse by the time the animal rights people had complained about it!

This is pure, unadulterated hypocrisy! I'm sure the Danes eat lots of fish, and don't tell me their capture and death is more humane than a quick blender experience. Is a goldfish somehow exempt because it is kept as a pet? How about an exhibit which would allow the public to kill an ant? Or a fly? Or a wasp? Would the animal rights activists be all over that? Why do goldfish have more "rights" than insects? I'm all for not being cruel and not torturing animals; in fact, I make sure to buy cage-free hen's eggs (yes, I know they still have little space, but it's better than a cage...) and free-range beef, when I can get it, but the actual killing of animals is routine. I realize there are vegans among us, and respect their right to eat what they wish, for whatever reason. I kill lettuce, too...

Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 7,210
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 7,210
yeahbut® is it art?


formerly known as etaoin...
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 876
old hand
Offline
old hand
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 876
I only know what I like... I wouldn't bother to see that exhibit.

Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 7,210
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 7,210
well, there's protest and/or making a statement, and then there's art. sometimes the two can be one and the same.

not in this case.


formerly known as etaoin...
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,295
Carpal Tunnel
OP Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,295
Cmon..two. You can keep exhibits of any animal to show how well you raised it ( matter of taste whether you like fringed poodles and manicured cock-a-doodies ) but you can't make a PUSH THE BUTTON TO MASH THE GOLDGFISHES-exhibition item. That's not a matter of hypocrisy. To call it art, that's hypocrisy.

I don't kill and ant nor fly either unless it really bugs me.
BTW,I think the ant would survive the blender. And good for him.
I am of opinion® ( stole your copyright-bug Etaoin) Looks chique.

Page 1 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  Jackie 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics13,913
Posts229,334
Members9,182
Most Online3,341
Dec 9th, 2011
Newest Members
Ineffable, ddrinnan, TRIALNERRA, befuddledmind, KILL_YOUR_SUV
9,182 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 752 guests, and 1 robot.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days)
Top Posters
wwh 13,858
Faldage 13,803
Jackie 11,613
wofahulicodoc 10,543
tsuwm 10,542
LukeJavan8 9,916
AnnaStrophic 6,511
Wordwind 6,296
of troy 5,400
Disclaimer: Wordsmith.org is not responsible for views expressed on this site. Use of this forum is at your own risk and liability - you agree to hold Wordsmith.org and its associates harmless as a condition of using it.

Home | Today's Word | Yesterday's Word | Subscribe | FAQ | Archives | Search | Feedback
Wordsmith Talk | Wordsmith Chat

© 1994-2024 Wordsmith

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5