Wordsmith.org: the magic of words

Wordsmith Talk

About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us  

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
#161412 08/08/06 02:23 PM
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,773
D
Pooh-Bah
OP Offline
Pooh-Bah
D
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,773
Urban Word of the Day
www.urbandictionary.com

August 08, 2006: wikiality

Reality as decided on by majority rule....

Still, Wikipedia has been shown to contain no more errors than a typical hardcover encyclopedia


dalehileman
#161413 08/08/06 03:43 PM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,055
B
old hand
Offline
old hand
B
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,055
> Reality as decided on by majority rule....

Oh, that's what post-modernists call consensual reality I think.

> Still, Wikipedia has been shown to contain no more errors than a typical hardcover encyclopedia

I believe that. But that won't change the minds of certain information sources that, by virtue of publishing re-written coporate press releases, fancy themselves truthier. I refer, for example, to the writers at 'The Register'.

#161414 08/08/06 03:55 PM
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 6,511
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 6,511
The wiki folks themselves held a conference last weekend to discuss this and other issues. If any of y'all are interested, here's the link:

http://wikimania2006.wikimedia.org/wiki/Schedule

#161415 08/09/06 02:39 PM
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
I've been wondering about something for a long time, and I might as well ask about it now: does wiki have some special meaning, perhaps internet-wise? I know wi-fi does, though I keep forgetting what it stands for...

#161416 08/09/06 03:32 PM
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,773
D
Pooh-Bah
OP Offline
Pooh-Bah
D
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,773


dalehileman
#161417 08/09/06 11:44 PM
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,230
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,230
Quote:

Urban Word of the Day
www.urbandictionary.com

August 08, 2006: wikiality

Reality as decided on by majority rule....

Still, Wikipedia has been shown to contain no more errors than a typical hardcover encyclopedia




Actually, that is definitely not true. Wikipedia made much of the claim, but the methodology was shown to be suspect, and the recording and definition of "errors" was extremely subjective. Britannica even threatened legal action against those responsible for the claim.

#161418 08/10/06 09:25 AM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,055
B
old hand
Offline
old hand
B
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,055
> the recording and definition of "errors"

Well, I can imagine. Many of the 'errors' in Britannica are those related to the fact that it is not up to date I suppose. For Britannica these are, of course, not errors - the entries are just dated. They are only wrong (and thus 'errors') to anyone who wants to use the thing as a reference that is abreast of developments. This is where wiki is 'more right';-)

#161419 08/10/06 09:45 AM
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,230
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,230
Quote:

> the recording and definition of "errors"

Well, I can imagine. Many of the 'errors' in Britannica are those related to the fact that it is not up to date I suppose. For Britannica these are, of course, not errors - the entries are just dated. They are only wrong (and thus 'errors') to anyone who wants to use the thing as a reference that is abreast of developments. This is where wiki is 'more right';-)




Now you're being VERY disingenuous. It was the article's writers who decided what they would class as errors, in order to make the outcome as favourable as possible to Wikipedia. While there is no better resource for details on the Klingon agricultural calendar or the history of the Xemacs/Emacs war, it's still a dodgy reference source, poorly written, poorly researched, and as your (almost pavlovian) reaction shows, manically sensitive to any criticism. And I say this as someone who uses it every day.

Last edited by sjmaxq; 08/10/06 09:46 AM.
#161420 08/10/06 02:16 PM
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 19
F
stranger
Offline
stranger
F
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 19
I've noticed errors in Wikipedia. Yeah well. It's handy.

Now that "wi-fi", wireless fidelity, has been mentioned - does it seem to anyone else an inappropriate, inaccurate term? Wireless is accurate, but where does fidelity enter into it?

#161421 08/10/06 02:30 PM
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,542
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,542
>where does fidelity enter into it?

what can one expect from a marketing takeoff on HiFi?

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3

Moderated by  Jackie 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics13,913
Posts229,372
Members9,182
Most Online3,341
Dec 9th, 2011
Newest Members
Ineffable, ddrinnan, TRIALNERRA, befuddledmind, KILL_YOUR_SUV
9,182 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 767 guests, and 1 robot.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days)
Top Posters
wwh 13,858
Faldage 13,803
Jackie 11,613
wofahulicodoc 10,561
tsuwm 10,542
LukeJavan8 9,919
AnnaStrophic 6,511
Wordwind 6,296
of troy 5,400
Disclaimer: Wordsmith.org is not responsible for views expressed on this site. Use of this forum is at your own risk and liability - you agree to hold Wordsmith.org and its associates harmless as a condition of using it.

Home | Today's Word | Yesterday's Word | Subscribe | FAQ | Archives | Search | Feedback
Wordsmith Talk | Wordsmith Chat

© 1994-2024 Wordsmith

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5