|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 91
journeyman
|
OP
journeyman
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 91 |
If I reply to an email, can I say I revert to you? Does "revert" have any meaning related to "reply( to an inquiry)"?
A contact wrote in reply to my email:"I'll revert to you, if need be." And I found the "revert" was a little off to my ear. I saw little of such uses, except another time quite a while ago and the then author seemed from the same region.
I’m learning English. If u find anywhere I can improve my composition, Pls do let me know. Bow.
Do inform me if you see any corrections needed in my written English.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,065
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,065 |
Hello, callithump. Revert is a very formal word. It has a technical legal meaning, but in this sort of context it just means "I'll reply to you again later."
People usually use it when, for example, they don't have the information you want so they'll have to look for it first, or if they will need to contact you again after taking some action.
Bingley
Bingley
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803 |
I would say that hardly anyone would understand what you meant if you used 'revert' in that way. The standard meaning of 'revert' is 'to return to a previous state'. The legal sense, according to the AHD, is to return to the original owner. Thus, a court may decided to revert stolen property to the original owner even though the property has gone through a number of otherwise perfectly legal transferences of ownership, e.g., a work of art stolen by an invading army, recovered by liberating troops, and donated to an art museum.
Use 'reply' if being formal, or 'get back to you' if informal.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,154
Pooh-Bah
|
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,154 |
I agree with Faldage. I would only say I'll revert to you if . . .nope that won't work either. Your ear was right Calli
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613 |
to revert stolen property to the original owner Hey, Faldage, how come you didn't say to revert back stolen property to the original owner, or to revert stolen property back to the original owner ?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,065
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,065 |
"will revert to you" gets 5860 google hits. Judging by the first few pages, most of them seem to mean "contact you again".
In the legal sense, it seems to be more common that property/rights revert to the original owner, rather than the court reverts the property/rights to the original owner.
Bingley
Bingley
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803 |
say to revert back stolen property to the original owner
Because there wasn't anything in the AHD definition that suggested use of the word back.
property/rights revert to the original owner, rather than the court reverts the property/rights
My bad. I didn't read close enough to note that it was an intransitive verb.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 508
addict
|
addict
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 508 |
Because there wasn't anything in the AHD definition that suggested use of the word back.
Isn't the notion of "back" implicit in the word? You wouldn't say "return back." Back is redundant.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613 |
That's what I thought, Nancy. The same reason we don't say reply back. So--why on earth have some people started saying return back?!?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,439
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,439 |
why on earth have some people started saying return back?!?
Because the world is going mad. Mad, I tell you! The precise use of English is becoming a lost art - except here of course. Revert ( a word with a precise legal definition) being used instead of reply (common useage) is the thin edge of the wedge! Mad, I tell you, Mad!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,526
veteran
|
veteran
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,526 |
I've never heard the word used in exactly that sense.
I've never looked up the definition, but I have used it an heard it used to mean that one falls back to a prior state.
"If I can't figure out an analytic (closed-form) solution, I'll revert to numerical methods."
"He tried to touch-type, but he continually reverted to using two fingers."
"Certain characteristics of some members of the mouse population reverted to atavistic forms."
I'm not sure these are correct, but that's the way I've seen it used.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 508
addict
|
addict
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 508 |
They all sound right to me, FF. Can't say I've heard it used much legally, but in everyday speech, your examples fit my experience.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803 |
Back is redundant.
You people act like redundancy were some sort of absolute evil. You don't complain about the phrase "three books" being redundant, or subject-verb agreement being redundant. No, that you like. Why is it all over sudden bad when someone says, "return back"?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,154
Pooh-Bah
|
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,154 |
all over sudden I would have said "all of a sudden". Is this a neologism, a regionalism or just a faldagism?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803 |
Actual, I got it from Pogo. I have heard "all of the sudden" in the wild.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 7,210
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 7,210 |
I could never really make sense of all of a/the/over sudden, so I usually revert *back to suddenly, or make something up.
formerly known as etaoin...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613 |
Must...restrain...fist...of death...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 133
member
|
member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 133 |
Jackie, don't start hitting Oliver Sudden!
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 16
stranger
|
stranger
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 16 |
how come you didn't say to revert back stolen property to the original owner, or to revert stolen property back to the original owner ?
My guess, Jackie, is that he has found the muzzle-loading tautologer awkward and obtrusive. How come do you ask?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 273
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 273 |
> Must...restrain...fist...of death...
Just go lay down for a while, until you've reorientated yourself. You'll feel much better.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 16
stranger
|
stranger
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 16 |
Why is it all over sudden bad when someone says, "return back"? Unless it is used for reinforcement or emphasis, tautology breeds ridicule and contempt, diminishing credibility. It sullies the credentials of anyone attempting to appear learned. However, to those who don't recognize the redundancy, it doesn't make a damn bit of difference.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,439
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,439 |
The operative words being "appear learned?" :) ;)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613 |
Just go lay down for a while, until you've reorientated yourself. ...And the penny drops. No wonder I've thought you didn't like me.
how come you didn't say to revert back stolen property to the original owner, or to revert stolen property back to the original owner ?
My guess, Jackie, is that he has found the muzzle-loading tautologer awkward and obtrusive. How come do you ask? I was playing devil's advocate, Mr. Neat. Trying to encourage discussion, is all. Well, that plus the fact that I grit my teeth when I hear the phrase 'return back'.
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics13,913
Posts229,331
Members9,182
|
Most Online3,341 Dec 9th, 2011
|
|
0 members (),
854
guests, and
1
robot. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|