Wordsmith.org: the magic of words

Wordsmith Talk

About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us  

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
#139143 02/12/05 06:06 PM
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,296
W
Carpal Tunnel
OP Offline
Carpal Tunnel
W
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,296
I have enjoyed considering eddies over the years and used the word in a poem a few years back.

However, I only recently learned that eddies are generally circular. Why so? My own visualization of eddies hadn't been of circular ones.

And a second definition that is just great:

"a contrary or circular current (as of thought or policy) " MW

A contrary thought! Contrary thoughts! Contrary policies! Wow! Why haven't I read this word used this way constantly?




#139144 02/12/05 06:12 PM
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 7,210
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 7,210
what kind of eddies have you seen that aren't generally circular?

realizing that that sentence is leaving things wide open...



formerly known as etaoin...
#139145 02/12/05 06:20 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,400
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,400
why are eddies (and gyres, for that matter) circular?

mostly because the earth rotates.

this effects prevailing winds, winds act on water currents, and since the oceans are 'closed loops (ie, most of the water in the Atlantic ocean stays in the atlantic ocean, and doesn't flow-- river like--into the pacific ocean or the indian ocean!), when water is moved by the wind NORTH AND EAST by the winds, it can't just flow(somewhere else!) , but a must move in a circular 'path' back to the south and west.

if you have water in a bath tub, you can set up a circular currnent. it isn't self sustaining. earths currents are more or less self sustaining by wind action.

eddies are often located were there are conflicting currents adjecnt to each other, and the eddies are almost like small bearing that take the presure of equalizing the two conflicting flows.

(for reason i don't fully understand,) High tide in the bronx (north end of 'EAST RIVER') is not at the same time as hightide in manhatan (south end of EAST RIVER)--(obviously the east river isn't really a river but a straight!)

Hell Gate is were the two conflicting tides 'meet' --it is marked by strong currents, whirlpools and eddies. the uneven levels of the tidal waters are 'evened out'--messily!


#139146 02/12/05 06:22 PM
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,296
W
Carpal Tunnel
OP Offline
Carpal Tunnel
W
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,296
Well, when traveling on the St. Johns River back in about 1971, we stopped to look into some blue pools that line the St. Johns like little blue arms. We saw eddies of water--water moving back against the general flow of the water--linear rivulets caused by heaven-only-knows-what. Contrary motion. Yes, that's how I think of eddies. But I just hadn't realized that eddies are generally circular. Today I've learned that my own immediate experience of eddies' moving in contrary motion to the general flow had been atypical and that, in fact, eddies are most often circular. I haven't ever seen a circular eddy although I have seen whirlpools caused by drops in water in streams. Are those eddies, too? I doubt it.


#139147 02/12/05 07:22 PM
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 7,210
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 7,210
huh. I think of eddies as always moving contrari-wise, even if the eddy itself is moving with the flow. and perhaps there's another name for a more linear contrary flow as you've experienced?



formerly known as etaoin...
#139148 02/12/05 08:43 PM
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 2,788
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 2,788
I think of eddies as always moving contrari-wise, even if the eddy itself is moving with the flow.

That would be Eddie Haskell.


#139149 02/13/05 12:33 AM
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,296
W
Carpal Tunnel
OP Offline
Carpal Tunnel
W
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,296
Eddie certainly was contrary. Wonder whether that was why he was so named.




#139150 02/13/05 01:37 AM
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 2,788
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 2,788
Wonder whether that was why he was so named.


Eddie's full name, on the program, was Edward Clark Haskell. The actor, Ken Osmond, went on to become a motorcycle patrol officer for the Los Angeles Police Department.


#139151 02/13/05 05:19 AM
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,542
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,542
I'm un-eddified. consider..

http://topex-www.jpl.nasa.gov/aviso/text/general/discover/results/weather.htm

http://www.nugrape.net/eddies.jpg

http://www.astronomynotes.com/solarsys/eddies.gif

http://www.geocities.com/~tkause/pics/eddies/biking-eddie.jpg

I guess the big red spot is circular, one.

(sorry about the last; you never know what's going to turn up with google™ images.)



#139152 02/13/05 10:48 AM
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,296
W
Carpal Tunnel
OP Offline
Carpal Tunnel
W
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,296
Well, tsuwm, those were certainly eddyfying. The second one wasn't a new release, was it?


#139153 02/13/05 01:21 PM
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,385
P
veteran
Offline
veteran
P
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,385
I haven't ever seen a circular eddy

That's why when you do see one, Wordwind, it's very eddifying. For me, as well.

A circular argument is no longer eddifying. What is contrary is often eddifying because it turns against the flow.

There's nothing wrong with the mainstream, of course. But it only flows in one direction.

More directions are no harm to the mainstream. If nothing else, they allow for some aimless excursions which might carry back crustaceans and such nestled in the silt of some dead-end rivulet.

These tasty morsels may help to feed the fish flowing in the mainstream.

Reminds me of a line from a little poem my father always enjoyed reciting to me when I was a kid [especially when I got into trouble]:

"Only the game fish swims upstream, the sensible fish swims down."

It's a good thing most fish are sensible enough to swim in schools. But there's a case to be made for fish who like to play hookey as well.


#139154 02/13/05 02:01 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,400
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,400
(sorry to those of you who read in the threaded mode.. this is out of order..)
one poster comments:
There's nothing wrong with the mainstream, of course. But it only flows in one direction.

yes, well maybe.. i guess.. but..

i live in NYC. We have a river, The Hudson
(well, technical it is a fjord, and technically in NYC (but not in NYS its called the North river, but these quibbles aside)

it is a large river. (well over 1 mile wide in NYC area)

It is a long and deep river (NYC/harbor does silt up, but just a few miles north of the city, where there is less silting, the river bed is over 250 feet deep)

the river has a 'backflow'--that is the ocean and tides flow upstream-- over 50 miles. (at high tide, the backflow current is much stronger than the downstream current, and the river flows 'upstream'!)

Most east coast rivers have water falls and the falls stop tidal backflows, (and since the falls are often less than 50 miles from the mouth of the rivers.. the back flow is limited) --the first falls on the Bronx river is less than 10 miles from mouth of the river, for example.

but tidal backflow is not unique to the Hudson.

and backflow is not only caused by tides.
several tributaries to the mississippi river creat backflow.

The mainstream, even when you talk about rivers, is differentiated because there are frequently (if not always) contrary flows.

I would argue the term mainstream evolved to clarify the predominant flow of water, but that there are backflows and contrary currents in almost every river (and eddies, form and collapse to deal with the backflows.)

--the same situation exist 'socially' --A mainstream idea (or behavior) might be the more common one, but there are always contrary ideas and behaviors going on.

Rereading, and trying to clarify, i recognize is the BUT in the second sentence that is bothering me.
There's nothing wrong with the mainstream, of course. But it only flows in one direction.(EA)

the but negates the whole first sentence. it implies there is something wrong. and then goes onto tell you what is wrong, (it only flows in one direction)

its like saying I agree with you totally, BUT for one point--well if you don't agree on 1 point, you don't agree totally.

So it seem the mainstream (ie, the predominant flow ) has 'nothing wrong' --Except it flows in one (predominant) direction (that is, it is the main stream.)

mmm.... i agree total with the person who posted the comment, BUT--




#139155 02/13/05 02:27 PM
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,385
P
veteran
Offline
veteran
P
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,385
mmm.... i agree total with the person who posted the comment, BUT--

I agree totally with the person who posted the comment, BUT -- [This argument is becoming circular. :) ]

Thanks for playin' along with my eddy, Of Troy. :)




#139156 02/16/05 08:57 PM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 176
D
member
Offline
member
D
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 176
Circ-LE-ar

[ smile ] Sorry: it was there; I had to take it. I try, but sometimes I just can’t help kicking that ‘nucular’ dog, wherever it may appear to me. [ /smile ]



#139157 02/16/05 11:53 PM
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,154
Z
Zed Offline
Pooh-Bah
Offline
Pooh-Bah
Z
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,154
Eddies occur where there is water flowing in one main direction. Sooner or later there will be an obstruction near the edge of the current and some of the water can't continue downstream so gets redirected upstream, it can't go in a contrary direction for ever and is eventually caught up again by the current and heads back down again. Thus the contrary flow has become circular, (actually it's usually oval.) Try looking where a log has fallen into the water at the edge of the stream.


#139158 02/17/05 12:15 PM
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,027
old hand
Offline
old hand
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,027
Thus the contrary flow has become circular, (actually it's usually oval.) - This remark points to the cause of the present controversy: a circle is generally considered a geometrical figure, all points of which are at the same distance from the centre. The adjective circular however, is often used in a topological rather than geometrical sense: a circular path simply has no beginning nor end, and its shape is irrelevant and can be very involved. An eddy is a is a circular path of water molecules - or electrons. Which is the direction of the mainstream - does not matter for the eddy.


#139159 02/17/05 12:30 PM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,055
B
old hand
Offline
old hand
B
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,055
> Why circular?

>> An eddy is a circular path of water molecules - or electrons.

Like all planets, all stars, all atoms and all things in this universe, eddies are vaguely spherical.
God created the universe and said: 'Here, have a ball!'



#139160 02/17/05 02:47 PM
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,027
old hand
Offline
old hand
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,027
Why does an expression like vaguely spherical go down quite well, while vaguely cubical would not?


#139161 02/17/05 03:24 PM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,055
B
old hand
Offline
old hand
B
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,055
> vaguely cubical

Well, a cube is an abstract geometrical shape, whereas spheres and spirals are natural facts found everywhere. A sphere is a decidedly simple and highly efficient form, a box is not - unless you want something to *not roll anywhere:-)
Your comment illuminates the interesting interplay between two basic personality types though: the very boxy, prickly ones versus the well-rounded<g>, touchy-feely ones. The difference here is not one of varying view points of course, but a question of one's focus or resolution.


#139162 02/17/05 03:57 PM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 176
D
member
Offline
member
D
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 176
I like ‘vaguely cubical’. In fact, I think vaguely works well with just about any word, the more unexpected, the better – ‘vaguely pregnant’, for example, or ‘vaguely dead’, ‘vaguely on’, ‘vaguely off’, ‘vaguely adamant’, ‘vaguely specific’, ‘vaguely exact’, and so on. As with koans, and certain forms of humor, an unexpected association of words affords one a millisecond or so of confusion, and/or clarity, temporarily derailing one's thoughts and giving her or him a short break from an otherwise relatively predictable day.

So, just out of curiosity, does that put me in the ‘touchy-feely’ sphere, or the ‘prickly’ box?



#139163 02/17/05 04:20 PM
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,542
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,542
>temporarily derailing one's thoughts

heaven forbid that any vaguely dyslexic people get near you!


#139164 02/17/05 05:46 PM
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 3,467
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 3,467
>Well, a cube is an abstract geometrical shape

The sentiment above must be taken with a grain of salt.



TEd
#139165 02/18/05 12:34 AM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 176
D
member
Offline
member
D
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 176
I remember as a little human, looking at grains of salt (the store-bought, iodized kind) under a magnifying glass. If I recall correctly, each grain was a cube, or at least cuboid. So, take a sentiment about a cube with a cube!

(Looking at what I have written, it dawns on me that perhaps TEd intended to allude to the cuboid properties of salt, in a double-entendre sorta-kinda way?)



#139166 02/18/05 12:44 AM
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
That would be our TEd's way, for sure, Dgeigh.
the ‘touchy-feely’ sphere, or the ‘prickly’ box?
Ooh, prickly box, prickly box! "Vaguely pregnant"--I love it!



#139167 02/18/05 12:53 AM
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,296
W
Carpal Tunnel
OP Offline
Carpal Tunnel
W
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,296
I've seen cushions that could be described as being 'vaguely cubical.'

Interesting to read here the various applications of 'vaguely'--but I don't supposed a person could be described as being 'vaguely vague'?


#139168 02/18/05 02:16 AM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 176
D
member
Offline
member
D
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 176
I don't supposed a person could be described as being 'vaguely vague'?

Oh, go ahead: supposed!



#139169 02/18/05 07:44 AM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,055
B
old hand
Offline
old hand
B
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,055
> looking at grains of salt

"Salt actually comes in several different kinds of shapes. Refined salt, commonly called "table salt," is fairly regular in shape, because it has been through several machines before it was packaged, and in order to make it easy to pour or shake, the grains are sort of rounded. Then there is rock salt, which is in irregular chunks. We could hit a couple chunks of rock salt with a hammer, and get a more natural shape of granule. Kosher salt is sea salt, and the grains are somewhat squared."

Not far off 'vaguely cubical', hey!

By the way, the third part of the film thriller series which started with 'Cube', then 'Hypercube', is running in theatres. Its title? - Cube Zero



#139170 03/01/05 12:51 AM
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 444
B
addict
Offline
addict
B
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 444
Recalls the old line about being 'a little bit pregnant'.

Also, can those of us currently on the frontline of pregnancy introduce a third option between touchy-feely and prickly box? Can we please please please be pregnantly vague. (I love the connotation of something impending, but undefined...)


Page 1 of 3 1 2 3

Moderated by  Jackie 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics13,913
Posts229,373
Members9,182
Most Online3,341
Dec 9th, 2011
Newest Members
Ineffable, ddrinnan, TRIALNERRA, befuddledmind, KILL_YOUR_SUV
9,182 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 155 guests, and 1 robot.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days)
Top Posters
wwh 13,858
Faldage 13,803
Jackie 11,613
wofahulicodoc 10,562
tsuwm 10,542
LukeJavan8 9,919
AnnaStrophic 6,511
Wordwind 6,296
of troy 5,400
Disclaimer: Wordsmith.org is not responsible for views expressed on this site. Use of this forum is at your own risk and liability - you agree to hold Wordsmith.org and its associates harmless as a condition of using it.

Home | Today's Word | Yesterday's Word | Subscribe | FAQ | Archives | Search | Feedback
Wordsmith Talk | Wordsmith Chat

© 1994-2024 Wordsmith

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5