Wordsmith.org: the magic of words

Wordsmith Talk

About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us  

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
#132767 09/10/04 07:05 PM
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,819
A
Pooh-Bah
Offline
Pooh-Bah
A
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,819
Then the question is when the movement took hold in the US (probably early on, I suspect) and what sort of Quaker 'activism' there may have been with respect to the Civil War.

I'm not sure that you would describe the movement as "catching on in the U.S." since the state of Pennsylvania was founded by (and named after) the Quaker William Penn. So in that respect the nation was born with a very large Quaker constituency. Quakers were and are opposed to violence and the term "Quaker guns" no doubt was used as a bit of irony. You are correct that their opposition to slavery put the Quakers into a delimma when it came to taking up arms against slavery. Many of them were conscientious objectors. President Lincoln wrote a Quaker in 1863

"Your people—the Friends—have had and are having a very great trial. On principle, and faith, opposed to both war and oppression, they can only practically oppose oppression by war. In this hard dilemma some have chosen one horn and some the other. For those appealing to me on conscientious grounds, I have done, and shall do, the best I could and can, in my own conscience, under my oath to the law. That you believe this, I doubt not; and, believing it, I shall still receive, for our country and myself, your earnest prayers to our Father in Heaven.

see http://www2.gol.com/users/quakers/abraham_lincoln.htm


#132768 09/10/04 07:20 PM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 72
C
journeyman
Offline
journeyman
C
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 72
Thanks for the info, Alex. Very interesting. Sweet Quakers.


#132769 09/11/04 01:04 PM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Welcome back, Rock Island.

how they reconciled these positions

One shouldn't have to kill people to convince them they're wrong.


#132770 09/11/04 02:08 PM
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 3,467
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 3,467
>One shouldn't have to kill people to convince them they're wrong.

On the other hand the recidivism rate drops immediately to zero.



TEd
#132771 09/11/04 02:36 PM
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,624
Pooh-Bah
Offline
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,624
Quakers got a bad name not so long ago: Richard Nixon was one.

Funnily enough, I first heard of Quaker guns when Sandra and I were doing a tour of several Civil War battlefields in 2001.

They used Quaker guns at Sharpsburg/Antietam. The Japanese-American ranger there showed us where the Confederates positioned them to deter a flank attack. They were, apparently, made on the spot and were really crude. It's not in any of the official histories and he got the information from some source he was holding close to his chest! He was doing his PhD on the battle.

Sharpsburg is the spookiest of the Civil War battlefields that we went to. It was, hands down, the bloodiest single day's action in the war.

It's one of the easiest on which to visualise the action. It may have been because we had such a good guide, but.


#132772 09/11/04 02:47 PM
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,296
W
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
W
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,296
How many fell at Sharpsburg as compared with the number who fell at Pickett's charge? I don't have either of these figures at hand at the moment. Just curious, really.


Page 2 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  Jackie 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics13,913
Posts229,372
Members9,182
Most Online3,341
Dec 9th, 2011
Newest Members
Ineffable, ddrinnan, TRIALNERRA, befuddledmind, KILL_YOUR_SUV
9,182 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 381 guests, and 1 robot.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days)
Top Posters
wwh 13,858
Faldage 13,803
Jackie 11,613
wofahulicodoc 10,561
tsuwm 10,542
LukeJavan8 9,919
AnnaStrophic 6,511
Wordwind 6,296
of troy 5,400
Disclaimer: Wordsmith.org is not responsible for views expressed on this site. Use of this forum is at your own risk and liability - you agree to hold Wordsmith.org and its associates harmless as a condition of using it.

Home | Today's Word | Yesterday's Word | Subscribe | FAQ | Archives | Search | Feedback
Wordsmith Talk | Wordsmith Chat

© 1994-2024 Wordsmith

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5