Wordsmith.org: the magic of words

Wordsmith Talk

About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us  

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4
#128574 05/14/04 04:03 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 725
old hand
OP Offline
old hand
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 725
THE PAOMNNEHAL PWEOR OF THE HMUAN MNID

Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in
waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoatnt tihng is taht the
frist and lsat ltteer be in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and
you can sitll raed it wouthit porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not
raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe.

Amzanig huh?



#128575 05/14/04 04:50 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,475
J
veteran
Offline
veteran
J
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,475
You can read all about it on my blog:

http://www.bisso.com/ujg_archives/000224.html et al.

It was slashdotted and snoped:

http://www.snopes.com/language/apocryph/cambridge.asp


#128576 05/15/04 02:20 PM
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
And here:
http://wordsmith.org/board/showflat.pl?Cat=&Board=miscellany&Number=113313

Tnahks, jheem. You have at least one observant subscriber: Am I missing something? Rearrange the letters of "rscheearch" and you get "research" plus a spare "ch"...




#128577 05/15/04 03:12 PM
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,542
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,542
>slashdotted and snoped

according to Wikipedia (certainly not the end-all of references), 'slashdotting' is the overwhelming of a website by a flood of page requests resulting from being mentioned on '/.'; I assume you're merely using 'slashdotted' to indicate that your blog and/or the discussion of this pehnmoneon were mentioned therein?




#128578 05/15/04 03:31 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,475
J
veteran
Offline
veteran
J
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,475
Yes, the canonical use of the verb slashdot means that as a result of a website being listed in a Slashdot entry, its server is overwhelmed by requests as folks click on through. Believe me, I noticed when I got listed in /. because my DSL bandwidth evaporated within minutes. For a week or so, I was getting up to a couple of hits per second. I still get a lot of traffic from the /. and the Snopes pages.


#128579 05/15/04 04:30 PM
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,624
Pooh-Bah
Offline
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,624
Wow, I know a man who's a legend in his own lunchtime!

The analogy breaks down with longer words, I've found. Jackie pointed out the misspelling of "researcher", but even if it had been written as "rasherceer" you would only pick it up from context.

Funny, though, how our brains can "forgive" the deliberate jumbling of ALL of the words in a piece of prose, but will zero in, unerringly, on a single spelling mistake ...


Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,475
J
veteran
Offline
veteran
J
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,475
Yes, we're very good at finding patterns in a noisy environment and making sense of them. Random lists of jumbled words would definitely be harder to understand. There's also a lot of redundancy in natural language, for good reason, so we can tolerate jumbled messages. Makes you wonder why folks get so bent out of shape at spelling errors and solecisms.


Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,661
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,661
Yes, it duz.


Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,636
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,636
An he duzzent even have to werk hard fur it!


Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
Makes you wonder why folks get so bent out of shape at spelling errors Because some of us have a personality that demands that things BE the way they ARE, and not they way they aren't. I think I've made it fairly clear here that I don't like gray areas. I want things to be either black or white. Or maybe sometimes one and then the other. But I want a clear delineation between the two--none of this, "Well, it could be this way if you look at it like this, but it could be that way if you look at it like that". That is not to say that I actually expect this, mind; just that I would strongly prefer it that way. I don't like permanent guesswork. I don't mind guessing my way through various types of puzzles, but I want to know for sure at the end what "the" answer is.
I want things to be precise. Errer is NOT error; never mind that I know what is meant. I have learned, with difficulty and not a 100% success rate, not to get so bogged down with what was and what wasn't, while telling a story that I lose my audience after my second sentence. But darn it, if such-and-such happened at 2 p.m., I can't stand it if somebody says it happened at 4. Even if the time has NO relevance to the point of the story, 4:00 is not 2:00! So--there's one reason for you.


Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4

Moderated by  Jackie 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics13,913
Posts229,372
Members9,182
Most Online3,341
Dec 9th, 2011
Newest Members
Ineffable, ddrinnan, TRIALNERRA, befuddledmind, KILL_YOUR_SUV
9,182 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 381 guests, and 1 robot.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days)
Top Posters
wwh 13,858
Faldage 13,803
Jackie 11,613
wofahulicodoc 10,561
tsuwm 10,542
LukeJavan8 9,919
AnnaStrophic 6,511
Wordwind 6,296
of troy 5,400
Disclaimer: Wordsmith.org is not responsible for views expressed on this site. Use of this forum is at your own risk and liability - you agree to hold Wordsmith.org and its associates harmless as a condition of using it.

Home | Today's Word | Yesterday's Word | Subscribe | FAQ | Archives | Search | Feedback
Wordsmith Talk | Wordsmith Chat

© 1994-2024 Wordsmith

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5