|About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us|
You are not logged in. [Log In] Wordsmith.org » Forums » General Topics » Q&A about words » rapprochement Register User Forum List Calendar Active Topics Search FAQ
#116268 - 11/19/03 06:11 AM rapprochement
Hey, isn't the word "process" redundant in the example from the Borneo Bulletin?
#116269 - 11/19/03 08:27 AM Re: rapprochement
Loc: Louisville, Kentucky
Welcome to you, Norah. I had to go searching for your ref.--I am not meticulous in reading my W.'s A. D., I'm afraid. But you did make me go and check Monday's Word--I do love them the best, because of the little narratives that go with them. And I found out--Anu's back, Anu's back! All's right with the world again.
Anyway--the quote is "Japanese anger over the kidnappings and North Korea's nuclear weapons ambitions have stalled the rapprochement process between Tokyo and
And the def. is:
Establishing or reestablishing of cordial relation,
especially between nations.
Oh man--every time I'm about to type yes or no to your question, I see the argument for the other way! We need an expert, please!
#116270 - 11/19/03 08:38 AM Re: rapprochement
In the context of Anu's definition, perhaps it could be considered slightly redundant (not that there's anything wrong with a little redundancy now and then for the sake of clarity, but). AHD4 gives another definition that has rapprochement as the product and not the process, and, using this definition I would say that is definitely not redundant.
#116271 - 11/19/03 08:52 AM Re: rapprochement
I think "rapprochement process" is correct. Rapprochement between two countries that have been bitter enemies requires many conciliatory actions on both sides over a long period of time, so it is a process.
#116272 - 11/19/03 09:38 AM Re: rapprochement
Let's see, I think my point is that rapprochement is a state, not a process, and that it may take a process to reach it but in this context whether or not there's been a long history of friction it's a little like saying "enmity process" ...
#116273 - 11/19/03 09:39 AM Re: rapprochement
you're arguing for my side, honey
#116274 - 11/19/03 09:47 AM Re: rapprochement
I dunno. Anu's definition was that of a process, so, given that definition, I'd go along with the idea of its being redundant*, with the disclaimer of my first post. If we are defining it as a state, the rapprochement process is the process of reaching that state. I still see no problem with that usage. But I'm just one voice in the AWAD Usage Panel.
*Remembering that the language is full of redundancies, many staunchly defended by the most prescriptive of grammarians.
#116275 - 11/19/03 09:49 AM Re: rapprochement
arguing for my side
And reaching a different conclusion?
#116276 - 11/19/03 09:57 AM Re: rapprochement
My dictionary gives two definitions, one "the re-establishing, etc..." and the other "the state of...", so I stand corrected, both are acceptable uses.
#116277 - 11/21/03 01:46 PM Re: rapprochement
Loc: Carpal Tunnel Country
I stand corrected
Why is it we "stand" corrected? Does that imply that we have been corrected but our dignity remains intact because we have not been knocked off our feet?
Just wondering where the term came from?
Forum Stats 8748 Members
Max Online: 3341 @ 12/09/11 02:15 PM
Newest Members grannygoose, BondNickles, bobwar, Johnreed28, Lakshman
8748 Registered Users
Who's Online 0 registered (), 29 Guests and 5 Spiders online. Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters (30 Days)
LukeJavan8 96 endymion6 94 wofahulicodoc 88 A C Bowden 55 Tromboniator 11 tuhin 2 Jorg 1 chicablanca 1
wwh 13858 Faldage 13803 Jackie 11609 tsuwm 10523 Buffalo Shrdlu 7210 LukeJavan8 6605 AnnaStrophic 6511 Wordwind 6296 of troy 5400 BranShea 5282
Board Rules · Mark all read Contact Us · Wordsmith.org · Top
Home | Today's Word | Yesterday's Word | Subscribe | FAQ | Archives | Search | Feedback
Wordsmith Talk | Wordsmith Chat
© 2014 Wordsmith