|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 13,858
Carpal Tunnel
|
OP
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 13,858 |
If I understand instructions in Webster's New International, the plural given for "Charles" in today's quote is incorrect.
" So Charles was crown'd; but now the angry mob Demand that he be brought to Tyburn Tree - Such is the curse on all odd-numbered Charles'." Emily Sheffield, Jackdaw, The Guardian (London), May 29, 1996."
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803 |
Are you saying they pluralated Charles by adding an apostrophe?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 13,858
Carpal Tunnel
|
OP
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 13,858 |
Dear Faldage: that appears to be the usage in the passage quoted. I shall not be surprised if our UK members say UK usage differs from US usage.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,004
old hand
|
old hand
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,004 |
My belief is that, even in the UK, it might be more likely for Charles to be pluralised Charleses. The Grauniad (in many other ways one of the world's best English language papers), can sometimes demonstrate a cavlier attitude to the language. The number of times its writers 'beg the question' inappropriately (at least for this logic-dillettante), is past count.
To be honest, I'm quite comfortable with the idea of using an apostrophe to account for the plural in such a case, but that may be because I enjoy using apostrophes wherever I can. In any case, I suspect that even the writer in The Guardian would expect the word to have been pronounced (in the reader's mind) as Charleses.
cheer
the sunshine warrior
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 13,858
Carpal Tunnel
|
OP
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 13,858 |
I have to admit "Charleses" looks horrid, but at least it cannot be confused with a genitive.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613 |
Is The Guardian a kind of thumbing-their-noses-at-societal-standards publication? If so, that might explain their (possibly) deliberate disregard of language proprieties.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,004
old hand
|
old hand
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,004 |
Check it out for yourself at guardian.co.uk :-)
I find it irresistible, and genuinely believe that the Saturday edition, in particular, is the most deeply satisfying weekend read ever.
But it is a huge 'Labour' supporter - it cannot help its left-wing right-on-ness, and, though no doubt proud of the standard of its writing (George Orwell being one of its most famous contributors), can tend to slip into the latest demotic rather more swiftly than its other national broadsheet counterparts.
At least it has a Reader's Editor (an ombudsman), who does on occasion address these issues in his column.
cheer
the sunshine warrior
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613 |
Man, what a disappointment to find out not only that this is a real word, but its meaning. From your sentence, I was hoping it was a coinage of emotive with demonic connotations!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 13,858
Carpal Tunnel
|
OP
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 13,858 |
Dear Jackie: I learned the word "demotic" from articles about ancient Egypt. Remember the Rosetta Stone, with three kinds of writing on it, that made it possible to decipher the hieroglyphics? Here is a good site about Egyptian writing.: http://www.egyptologyonline.com/hieroglyphs.htm
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,004
old hand
|
old hand
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,004 |
Thanks for the ref, Bill. Of course, sorry to disappoint, Jackie, but the word is used these days (as far as I am aware), in the way the 'vulgar' was used for Latin, I think (remember Jerome's famous Vulgate?). Vernacular, also, is sometimes used in a similar sense. Of course, except perhaps for the earlier use of vulgar, none of these uses is strictly, ie literally, accurate.
Or have I got that wrong?
the sunshine "I rarely look up words so I frequently get it wrong" warrior
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 13,858
Carpal Tunnel
|
OP
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 13,858 |
Dear Shanks: It seems to me that "vulgar" is now strongly pejorative, "vernacular" moderately so, but "demotic" still means merely "of the people". Or have I been misled?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,004
old hand
|
old hand
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,004 |
Don't ask me! Yes, I know about the pejorative connotations of vulgar and vernacular, but merely have a hint of a memory that 'demotic' was originally a word that specifically referred to the Egyptian labguage, and wasn't widely, or at all, applied to the 'common' tongue in other languages. Until, of course, recently. Hence my claim that it was inaccurately used. I could be worng though, given my reluctance to actually look anything up.
cheer
the sunshine warrior
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,230
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,230 |
Well, sunshine, I'm going to weaken your case still further by saying that your understanding of the the situation is also mine.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 13,858
Carpal Tunnel
|
OP
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 13,858 |
Source: The Collins English Dictionary © 2000 HarperCollins Publishers:
demotic [dý'mɒtýk] adjective 1 of or relating to the common people; popular 2 of or relating to a simplified form of hieroglyphics used in ancient Egypt by the ordinary literate class outside the priesthood Compare: hieratic noun 3 the demotic script of ancient Egypt [ETYMOLOGY: 19th Century: from Greek demotikos of the people, from demotes a man of the people, commoner; see demos] de'motist noun
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,004
old hand
|
old hand
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,004 |
I got there too, Doctor. But then realised that perhaps what the hint in the back of my feeble brain had been was this: that Demotic, used for a language, was originally only relevant to Egyptian. As a general term, of course, as you point out, it simply means 'of the people'.
I don't think we have an argument here. Thanks for the ref.
cheer
the sunshine warrior
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,230
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,230 |
that Demotic, used for a language, was originally only relevant to Egyptian. As a general term, of course, as you point out, it simply means 'of the people'.
All sorted? Well that's just capital!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,692
Pooh-Bah
|
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,692 |
'of the people'. All sorted? Well that's just capital!Yes, full Marx!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803 |
full Marx
Are you sure you're Lincoln to the right historical figure?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,692
Pooh-Bah
|
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,692 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,230
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,230 |
Das Kapital? That can't be right!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 6,511
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 6,511 |
No, it's left.
I swore to myself I wasn't gonna participate in this, but.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,692
Pooh-Bah
|
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,692 |
Anyone recognise this?
"And after thousands and thousands and thousands of years, and after Hieroglyphics and Demotics, and Nilotics, and Cryptics, and Cufics, and Runics, and Dorics, and Ionics, and all sorts of other ricks and tricks (because the Woons, and the Neguses, and the Akhoonds, and the Repositories of Tradition would never leave a good thing alone when they saw it), the fine old easy, understandable Alphabet—A, B, C, D, E, and the rest of ’em—got back into its proper shape again for all Best Beloveds to learn when they are old enough."
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 13,858
Carpal Tunnel
|
OP
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 13,858 |
And now there is little left worth saying.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,004
old hand
|
old hand
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,004 |
Can't remember the actual story - but it's all about li'l thingy and her dad and the way they make up shapes to represent sounds and hence invent the alphabet. Yes? I
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics13,913
Posts229,397
Members9,182
|
Most Online3,341 Dec 9th, 2011
|
|
0 members (),
579
guests, and
1
robot. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|