of troy does not have to compile a list of quotes to prove her case.
Sounds to me like you're saying, "Don't confuse me with facts."

The equalizer is simply showing ...
No ma'am. I raise the question of whether equalizer, dissatisfied with my presence, is therefore entitled to bring it up incessantly and in inflammatory language. In other words, whether the end justifies the means.

He/she is welcome to an opinion of whether I should be here. Does that justify such speech in an attempt to enforce that opinion? Or are there proper civilized means to conduct discussion even if one believes (rightly or wrongly), as does equalizer, that one's opponent is in the wrong?

I suggest that decent human beings simply do not speak that way, regardless of provocation. Read equalizer's words, and see what you think.

Would you want to be in the same room with someone who talks that way?

[Edit to PissandMoan: Glad to answer your question. Put it in a new thread, so as not to divert from the question posed here -- unless of course your intent was to divert.]