|
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 833
old hand
|
old hand
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 833 |
I'm not aware of all the ins and outs of it, but I do know that a handful of writers (or was it one writer? with a handful behind him?!) sued The Globe and Mail (Canada's national newspaper - one of 'em, anyway) because of the electronic copyright situation there. The Globe was not paying for electronic rights, yet was using them on its website (as I understand it) - and making money every time someone paid to download an article. (Sorry, I don't know what the result was, or even if there has been a result yet.) This "information age" has made copyright law rather tricky (lawyers on this site can probably attest to that). But as the article you've provided a link for suggests, we were in trouble even with the photocopier. I'm sure if I had a dime for every copy someone Out There has made from my published articles, I'd be a rich woman. It's not that I've had a LOT published nationally, but I have had three articles in the Globe (a long time ago - 1993) and two of them were on fairly volatile subjects that meant the pieces begged to be copied and handed out (in certain circs). Of course I have no idea how much they were copied. Technically, no one may photocopy something without the author's permission (assuming copyright has not expired) - but I'm sure the instances in which I WAS contacted, were just the tip of the iceberg. It's something that makes me nervous about sending my work to anyone electronically. If it's a commissioned article and I know I'll be paid for it, I don't mind as much - though I still wonder if anyone will shanghai it on its way and then pass it off as his/her own in some neck o' the woods of which I have no inkling.... In Canada, every written thing is copyrighted the instant it is created. That's all very well, but alas, there is no proof. The most obvious thing you can do (and I have done it) to protect your writing, is to send it to yourself by registered mail and not open the envelope when it arrives. This will stand up in a court of law, should anyone plagiarize your work and you discover the crime. But electronic media - tricky, very tricky. The world-wide web is just that - world-wide. How can you police it all to your own satisfaction and know that no one is using your work? Fortunately, plagiarism of this kind seems pretty rare, but you never know....
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,296
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,296 |
Freedom of public information. Pure and simple. End of argument.
DubDoubtless
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,542
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,542 |
Freedom of public information. Pure and simple. End of argument.
[snip] (saving for posterity) [snip]... here is our princess of double dubiety, who sees (we thought) everything through multicolored glasses, taking a solidly black-and-white stance.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,400
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,400 |
well, i am most second WW-- Yes, freedom of information.
but if i am making a profit off your work.. well that is theft.
if i take your work for my own personal pleasure, and enjoyment, and do not distribute for profit. even if you are trying to sell it in other media, i might take it for free in electronic media.. and thats OK
There are "free" i pay for all the time. I pay for "public TV" , i am a sponsering member of several museums.. museums that any one of you could enter for a 1 cent (they are not quite free, you must pay something, but 1 cent is something.) i buy books that i can read on line, or borrow from the library for free.
i buy the NY times, even though its available for free on line. the electronic formate doesn't meet all my needs.
i have posted links to the New Yorker-- maybe you have read them, and thought.. "gee, i never read this magazine, and i never thought i'd enjoy it, but now, i see it is something i would like! substitute Discover, Scientific American, the Guardian, etc., for the New Yorker
and maybe now you subscribe! the free information doesn't mean the end of paid information, it might even make other media more valuable or viable!
and if read something by our modest godsess, and was impressed, i might got to amazon, and search to see if she had a book available.. the "free copy" might wet my interest.
we've had libraries available in US (free libraries!) for almost 200 years. (some places longer!) free libraries don't put publishers out of business, or book stores out of business.. if anything, libraries introduce us to reading, and to authors, and increases the likely hood we will by a book!
hollywood was convince no one would go to movies once VRC appeared, especially if someone could tape movies! but more people than ever go to the movies.
i think they are being anti american, and doing themselve no good either! nowdays people are buying 'home theaters' -- they are not generally watching movies on their lap tops, even if they can down load a dvd image and watch it on line. i have seen pieces of movies, or parts of movies on a plane, and then gone out and rented them. sometimes i never would have thought to rent a movie, except i saw it, or a piece of it.. for free!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,409
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,409 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803 |
All generalisations are dangerous.
Theft of intellectual property. Pure and simple. End of argument.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,409
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,409 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,055
old hand
|
old hand
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,055 |
If the owner of certain artistic property cannot be determined unequivocally, then it belongs to every single person who holds it in memory and makes use of it.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 13,858
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 13,858 |
Some solemn predictions turn out to be laughably erroneous. I can remember very mediocre musicians in the twenties declaring that "canned music" was a serious threat to sll musicians, that no reproduced music should be legal.
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics13,913
Posts229,580
Members9,187
|
Most Online3,341 Dec 9th, 2011
|
|
0 members (),
332
guests, and
0
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|