Wordsmith Talk |
About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us | |||
Register Log In Wordsmith Talk Forums General Topics Q&A about words Royal Redundancy
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
I agree that 'William I the Conqueror' is quite wrong, and some punctuation, either commas or brackets, is needed to clarify the two styles.
Yep, me too. Not least because whatever the letters say we surely all read William I as "William the first", so there is an additionally unhandy the~the duplication. The only time I would actually say only the numeral would be a play by Shakepeare - but mayhap they do it diffurrinly in the US?
Entire Thread Subject Posted By Posted ![]()
Royal Redundancy
Jazzoctopus 01/28/2002 1:08 AM ![]()
Re: Royal Redundancy
wwh 01/28/2002 1:35 AM ![]()
Re: Royal Redundancy
doc_comfort 01/28/2002 2:22 AM ![]()
Re: Royal Redundancy
Faldage 01/28/2002 1:18 PM ![]()
Re: Royal Redundancy
NicholasW 01/28/2002 3:12 PM ![]()
.
Max Quordlepleen 01/28/2002 2:15 AM ![]()
Re: Royal Redundancy
wow 01/28/2002 3:31 PM ![]()
Re: Royal Redundancy
of troy 01/28/2002 5:23 PM ![]()
Re: Royal Redundancy
maverick 01/28/2002 7:47 PM ![]()
Just William
NicholasW 01/28/2002 8:26 PM ![]()
Re: Just William
Jackie 01/29/2002 2:16 AM ![]()
Re: Just William
doc_comfort 01/30/2002 12:56 AM
Moderated by Jackie
Link Copied to Clipboard
Forum Rules · Mark All Read Contact Us · Forum Help · Wordsmith Talk