|
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1
stranger
|
OP
stranger
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1 |
I'm puzzled by the behaviour of distance words such as inch, foot and mile. Their use of plurals seems odd. For example, one would say "a three-inch nail" but it's "three inches long"; a twelve-foot wall is twelve feet high; a four mile run covers four miles. What is the rule here?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 218
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 218 |
I'd venture to say this occurrence is not related to "distance." For example, we commmonly refer to basketball teams as five-man, though there are 5 men. A three-woman singing group has three women. In English, we have the ability to convert a plural-oriented adjective into a singular form. Wish I had a two-screen computer.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,027
old hand
|
old hand
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,027 |
Hi Brandon, Further examples are five-dollar bill and two-bedroom house. But your formulation of the RULE doesn't satify me. The rule should say something like "nouns preceded by numbers are put in singular if..." if what? Best regards
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,004
old hand
|
old hand
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,004 |
Isn't it about the 'head' word? If run, wall, team, etc are treated as singular, then the adjectival forms for them - 4 mile, 12 foot, 5 woman, will simply agree with this singular.
While we may not see the particular 'logic' in this, it appears to be a consistent rule. Even when the head noun is pluralised, we seem to remember this rule - "There were 12 five-foot walls around the courtyard".
cheer
the sunshine warrior
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 81
journeyman
|
journeyman
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 81 |
The distance is a singular distance. Five foot, three inch, &c. The unit used to measure the distance is what is being pluralised. The nail has a single length, this length is not three units. The measurement of the nail is three inches. A five feet wall would be a wall of five levels each a foot in height. In the same way a five men side of would consist of a team of five groups of men of unknown size (but greater than one), a five man side consists of one side of five singular men. Completely logical and straight forward when you realise that a team of several people is one team and a length of several units of measurement is one length.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 1
stranger
|
stranger
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 1 |
To add to Philip Davis' explanation, you can charecterize those hypenated words as resembling collections, in that they have a singular form. Instead, they are descriptive nouns or adjectivized nouns. (Am I coining new phrases here?) So, in a collection of Nails, (computer geeks would call it a class) one has, among others, Three-inch nails and five-inch nails(sub classes). IF I look, I may find a three-inch nail (an instance of the subclass) measures just 2.8 inches long because of a manufacturing defect.
To use the other examples, a five man team may actually have 9 men including reserves, but only five of them will play in the three-legged race.
Am I killing it to death?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 81
journeyman
|
journeyman
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 81 |
HSallim has expressed it well. The example given above of the 5 dollar note is another very good example. It is not five one dollar notes but one five dollar note, one of many notes of several values.
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics13,913
Posts229,416
Members9,182
|
Most Online3,341 Dec 9th, 2011
|
|
0 members (),
578
guests, and
5
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|