Wordsmith Talk |
About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us | |||
Register Log In Wordsmith Talk Forums General Topics Miscellany half-witicism
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
pray tell, have all the rules of grammar been swept away….?
[rant]
Earth calling, Earth calling. Wake up, girl, wherever you’ve been the last 140 years, cause you gotta hear the news – not only have “the rules” been swept away, but also so have their basic validity as a linguistic concept. It is now widely taken for granted that like all other meta-language, linguistic constructions such as ‘grammar’ are post-facto creations of the human mind – they are descriptions, models, attempts to find the patterns in what is, not some frumpy schoolmarm-ish code of what must be. Descriptions of how particular speech communities use their variety of language – yes. Guidance notes as to what may therefore be preferable to fit certain social norms – sometimes. Rules – never.
So sorry, as you seen to have an insecure craving for The TRUTH – but RealLife™ is more complicated.
As for your assertion that It may sound awkward, but so what, if it's correct? – I can be bothered to raise nothing more grand than a big fat raspberry.![]()
![]()
If you cannot hear the natural euphony of a language, you are failing to even get to first base. And hence your ability to turn the famous Winston Churchill quote through 180° of meaning - no dabbling in the box of coloured crayons can recompense for that.
[/rant]
Entire Thread Subject Posted By Posted ![]()
half-witicism
Faldage 03/10/2001 9:32 PM ![]()
Re: half-witicism
wwh 03/11/2001 4:06 PM ![]()
Re: Requiem not an opera
Faldage 03/12/2001 1:19 PM ![]()
Re: Requiem not an opera
maverick 03/12/2001 1:31 PM ![]()
Re: grammar
Shoshannah 03/12/2001 10:17 PM ![]()
Re: grammar
Bingley 03/13/2001 5:04 AM ![]()
Re: grammar
Capital Kiwi 03/13/2001 9:12 AM ![]()
Re: grammar
belligerentyouth 03/13/2001 9:58 AM ![]()
Re: grammar
maverick 03/13/2001 12:29 PM ![]()
Re: grammar - time out
Max Quordlepleen 03/13/2001 8:04 PM ![]()
Re: grammar - time out
Anonymous 03/13/2001 8:32 PM ![]()
Re: Year One, second chance
wow 03/14/2001 12:51 AM ![]()
Re: grammar - time out
nancyk 03/14/2001 1:54 AM ![]()
Re: time out
tsuwm 03/14/2001 2:14 AM ![]()
Re: time out
Anonymous 03/14/2001 4:58 AM ![]()
Re: time out
Max Quordlepleen 03/14/2001 6:16 AM ![]()
Re: Of shoes and ships
Capital Kiwi 03/14/2001 6:50 AM ![]()
Re: time out
Fiberbabe 03/14/2001 2:05 PM ![]()
Re: time out
wwh 03/14/2001 2:37 PM ![]()
Re: time out
Fiberbabe 03/14/2001 2:44 PM ![]()
Re: time out
tsuwm 03/14/2001 11:58 PM ![]()
Re: time out
wwh 03/15/2001 1:01 AM ![]()
Re: time out
tsuwm 03/15/2001 2:30 AM ![]()
Re: time out
wwh 03/15/2001 10:50 AM ![]()
Re: time out
Anonymous 03/14/2001 3:39 PM ![]()
ceiling wax!
of troy 03/14/2001 3:47 PM ![]()
Re: sealing wacks!
maverick 03/14/2001 4:00 PM ![]()
Re: ceiling wax!
Anonymous 03/14/2001 10:42 PM ![]()
Re: time out
Jazzoctopus 03/14/2001 10:45 PM ![]()
Re: half-witicism
Shoshannah 03/11/2001 4:50 PM ![]()
Re: half-witicism
tsuwm 03/11/2001 4:57 PM ![]()
Re: half-witicism
wwh 03/11/2001 5:08 PM ![]()
Re: half-witicism
tsuwm 03/11/2001 5:19 PM ![]()
Re: half-witicism
AnnaStrophic 03/11/2001 5:41 PM ![]()
Re: half-witicism
Max Quordlepleen 03/11/2001 5:55 PM ![]()
Re: grammar
Shoshannah 03/11/2001 7:09 PM ![]()
Re: grammar
wwh 03/11/2001 7:27 PM ![]()
Re: grammar
Shoshannah 03/11/2001 7:41 PM ![]()
Re: grammar
AnnaStrophic 03/11/2001 7:55 PM ![]()
Re: grammar
tsuwm 03/11/2001 8:59 PM ![]()
Re: grammar
AnnaStrophic 03/11/2001 9:33 PM ![]()
Re: grammar
wwh 03/12/2001 1:09 AM ![]()
Re: up with which
wow 03/12/2001 1:56 AM ![]()
Re: up with which
of troy 03/12/2001 1:28 PM ![]()
Re: grammar
Faldage 03/12/2001 1:49 PM ![]()
Re: grammar
wsieber 03/12/2001 2:15 PM ![]()
Re: grammar
Faldage 03/12/2001 3:11 PM ![]()
Re: grammar
wwh 03/12/2001 3:28 PM ![]()
Re: grammar
wow 03/12/2001 3:31 PM ![]()
Re: grammar
wwh 03/12/2001 3:48 PM ![]()
Re: will v. shall
Faldage 03/12/2001 3:52 PM ![]()
Re: will v. shall
wwh 03/12/2001 4:07 PM ![]()
Re: will v. shall
Faldage 03/12/2001 4:45 PM ![]()
Re: will v. shall
wwh 03/12/2001 5:03 PM ![]()
Re: will v. shall
tsuwm 03/12/2001 5:17 PM ![]()
Re: will v. shall
maverick 03/12/2001 6:12 PM ![]()
Re: will v. shall
wow 03/12/2001 9:40 PM ![]()
Re: will v. shall
Shoshannah 03/12/2001 10:29 PM ![]()
Re: will v. shall
wwh 03/12/2001 10:36 PM ![]()
Re: will v. shall
Shoshannah 03/12/2001 10:49 PM ![]()
Re: will v. shall
Faldage 03/13/2001 1:44 PM ![]()
Re: will v. shall
Hyla 03/13/2001 12:24 AM ![]()
Shall/must/will/should/may
Sparteye 03/13/2001 3:22 PM ![]()
Re: Shall/must/will/should/may
Faldage 03/13/2001 8:21 PM ![]()
Re: Shall/must/will/should/may
wow 03/14/2001 1:01 AM ![]()
Re: clean slate
wwh 03/14/2001 1:31 AM ![]()
Louisiana law
Sparteye 03/14/2001 2:54 PM ![]()
Re: Louisiana law
of troy 03/14/2001 3:16 PM ![]()
Re: grammar
Sparteye 03/12/2001 5:02 PM ![]()
Re: grammar
Max Quordlepleen 03/12/2001 6:16 PM ![]()
Dr Seuss
Sparteye 03/12/2001 6:28 PM ![]()
Re: Dr Seuss
Max Quordlepleen 03/12/2001 6:36 PM ![]()
Re: grammar
tsuwm 03/12/2001 10:49 PM ![]()
Re: grammar
Shoshannah 03/12/2001 10:52 PM ![]()
Re: grammar
tsuwm 03/12/2001 11:12 PM ![]()
Re: grammar
wwh 03/12/2001 11:24 PM ![]()
Re: half-witicism
wow 03/12/2001 2:05 AM ![]()
Re: half-witicism
Bobyoungbalt 03/12/2001 7:25 PM ![]()
Nice thing about threaded mode
Faldage 03/12/2001 8:43 PM
Moderated by Jackie
Link Copied to Clipboard
Forum Rules · Mark All Read Contact Us · Forum Help · Wordsmith Talk