Wordsmith Talk |
About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us | |||
Register Log In Wordsmith.org Forums General Topics Weekly Themes Lignify
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Originally Posted By: SteveOriginally Posted By: goofyBut this hypothesis is not falsifiable in your theory, because your theory doesn't account for regular sound change.
This is a logical fallacy called begging the question; that is, assuming that the question — “Are the sound changes that historical linguists consider inviolable laws regular?” — has already been answered affirmatively. And It most certainly hasn’t — at least in any way that a logician, empirical scientist or philosopher of science should consider logical or scientific. To the contrary, the answer to the question is evidently “No,” even though you’re having trouble accepting that answer.
I think we know that sound change is at least partly regular, because we have a mass of evidence showing regular sound correspondences. The reason we assume that sound change is invariably regular is because it lets us make predictions and falsifiable hypotheses. In other words, it's a useful assumption. If we assume that sound change isn't invariably regular, then we can't predict how the forms of words will differ across languages, and every hypothesis we make is as valid as any other. I have no interest in that sort of theory, it's not useful or interesting.Quote:
On the other hand, I’ve just disproved the supposed laws specifying that Gc *p and *d never correspond to Gk and L *p and *d.
No, you've simply asserted that some words are related, without offering an explanation of the various historical processes that led to the different forms. Why do some of the Germanic words begin with p and some with f.
Entire Thread Subject Posted By Posted Lignify Steve 06/20/11 12:12 PM Re: Lignify Candy 06/20/11 02:48 PM Re: Lignify LukeJavan8 06/20/11 03:46 PM Re: Lignify Jackie 06/21/11 03:22 AM Re: Lignify goofy 06/21/11 01:24 PM Re: Lignify Steve 06/22/11 05:03 PM Re: Lignify Steve 06/22/11 04:18 PM Re: dignify zmjezhd 06/23/11 01:08 PM Re: dignify [sic] Steve 06/24/11 02:43 PM Re: dignify [sic] goofy 06/24/11 03:31 PM Re: dignify [sic] Steve 06/25/11 03:13 PM Re: dignify [sic] goofy 06/25/11 10:46 PM Re: dignify [sic] Steve 06/26/11 01:50 PM Re: dignify [sic] Faldage 06/26/11 03:09 PM Re: dignify [sic] LukeJavan8 06/26/11 03:47 PM Re: dignify [sic] snoot 06/26/11 05:59 PM Re: dignify [sic] BranShea 06/26/11 09:14 PM Re: dignify [sic] Avy 06/27/11 01:19 AM Re: dignify [sic] LukeJavan8 06/27/11 04:42 AM Re: dignify [sic] Tromboniator 06/27/11 05:37 AM Re: dignify [sic] Avy 06/27/11 01:46 PM Re: dignify [sic] Candy 06/27/11 10:12 AM Re: dignify [sic] LukeJavan8 06/27/11 11:03 PM Re: dignify [sic] Candy 06/25/11 03:32 AM Re: dignify [sic] goofy 06/25/11 04:22 AM Re: dignify [sic] Candy 06/26/11 04:01 AM Re: liquify [sink] zmjezhd 06/25/11 01:50 PM Re: liquify [sink] Steve 06/25/11 03:25 PM Re: liquify [sink] LukeJavan8 06/25/11 03:35 PM Re: dignify [sic] Jackie 06/29/11 12:46 AM Re: dignify [sic] LukeJavan8 06/29/11 03:08 PM Re: dignify [sic] slowhand 06/30/11 02:17 AM
Moderated by Jackie
Link Copied to Clipboard
Forum Statistics Forums16Topics13,913Posts229,412Members9,182 Most Online3,341
Dec 9th, 2011
Newest Members Ineffable, ddrinnan, TRIALNERRA, befuddledmind, KILL_YOUR_SUV
9,182 Registered Users
Who's Online Now 0 members (), 907 guests, and 3 robots. Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days) A C Bowden 28
Top Posters wwh 13,858Faldage 13,803Jackie 11,613wofahulicodoc 10,583tsuwm 10,542LukeJavan8 9,922Buffalo Shrdlu 7,210AnnaStrophic 6,511Wordwind 6,296of troy 5,400
Forum Rules · Mark All Read Contact Us · Forum Help · Wordsmith.org