|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 8
stranger
|
OP
stranger
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 8 |
I just joined AWAD today and posted in a wrong forum just a few minutes ago This is an extremely simple question. I can't seem to remember the word that you use to mean "in fear of." Quick answer, anyone? Thanks!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 8
stranger
|
OP
stranger
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 8 |
Nevermind, I got it, it's "lest"
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613 |
posted in a wrong forum A-HAH! Caught! By self-admission! You are hereby sentenced to ten lashes with a wet noodle. (Glad to have you. If I recall your example sentence correctly, it just didn't sound quite "right" to me; and I think it was because lest was followed by a negative. I've seen it either all, or nearly all the time, followed by a positive construct. That is, 'he studied hard lest he fail the exam', not 'he studied hard lest he wouldn't do well'. Though that's not quite it, either: 'he studied hard lest he not pass the exam' sounds okay to my ears. )
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 8
stranger
|
OP
stranger
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 8 |
Thanks a lot for the pointers! Maybe it's the tense that's not right there? Should "lest" be followed by a sentence with subjunctive? Can you say,
He studied hard lest he should fail the exam
?
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 456
addict
|
addict
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 456 |
Always thought that was already implied. Would it not have to be, lest 'lest he fail the exam' not be 'anticipatory*'? *Spell-check did not balk
ÅΓª╥┐↕§
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 8
stranger
|
OP
stranger
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 8 |
Great example! Gotcha!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 427
addict
|
addict
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 427 |
On Remembrance Day(s) I've oftentimes heard folks unwittingly say the exact opposite of what they mean, with "Lest we don't forget".
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 7,210
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 7,210 |
> "Lest we don't forget".
yeah, I've heard it that way. I think that's one of those double negatives to make a point things.
I haven't thought about lest being a negative/fear thing before.
Last edited by etaoin; 06/15/06 12:43 AM.
formerly known as etaoin...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803 |
Quote:
I haven't thought about lest being a negative/fear thing before.
So haven't I.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,773
Pooh-Bah
|
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,773 |
car: To avoid repetition, you can sub "else" or "ere"
dalehileman
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 508
addict
|
addict
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 508 |
Not so much "in fear of" as "for fear that." Or am I splitting hairs?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 7,210
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 7,210 |
split away, nan, makes sense to me.
formerly known as etaoin...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 8
stranger
|
OP
stranger
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 8 |
Yep, it's definitely "for fear that." I only had a vague idea of what I was looking for.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 456
addict
|
addict
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 456 |
Quote:
Not so much "in fear of" as "for fear that." Or am I splitting hairs?
No, that is much better. It should work like substitution in algebra. Observe:
Avoid the whirlpool, lest ye may drown. Avoid the whirlpool, in fear of ye may drown. Avoid the whirlpool, for fear that ye may drown. They avoided the whirlpool, lest drowning.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 10,598 Likes: 1
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 10,598 Likes: 1 |
Quote:
Quote:
Not so much "in fear of" as "for fear that." Or am I splitting hairs?
No, that is much better. It should work like substitution in algebra. Observe:
Avoid the whirlpool, lest ye may drown. Avoid the whirlpool, in fear of ye may drown. Avoid the whirlpool, for fear that ye may drown. They avoided the whirlpool, lest drowning.
...Why not just "Avoid the whirlpool, lest ye drown."?
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 456
addict
|
addict
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 456 |
...Why not just "Avoid the whirlpool, lest ye drown."?
Seemed to sing better at the time, as if the drowning part was not a certainty. But pondering it later, Could it that may be wrong, and might would make right? Wishing to have that little brown grammar book from elementary school again. "Lest ye drown" does sound better anyway.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 11
stranger
|
stranger
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 11 |
By faith, he kept the Passover and the sprinkling of blood lest he who destroyed the firstborn should touch them [Israel]. (NKJ)
By faith, he kept the Passover, and the sprinkling of the blood, that the destroyer of the firstborn should not touch them. (WEB)
By faith he kept the passover, and the sprinkling of the blood, that the destroyer of the firstborn should not touch them. (ASV)
By faith he kept the Passover, and put the sign of the blood on the houses, so that the angel of destruction might not put their oldest sons to death. (BBE)
By faith he celebrated the passover and the sprinkling of the blood, that the destroyer of the firstborn might not touch them. (DBY)
Through faith he kept the passover, and the sprinkling of blood, lest he that destroyed the firstborn should touch them. (KJV)
Through faith he kept the passover, and the sprinkling of blood, lest he that destroyed the first-born should touch them. (WBS)
Through faith he instituted the Passover, and the sprinkling with blood so that the destroyer of the firstborn might not touch the Israelites. (WEY)
by faith he kept the passover, and the sprinkling of the blood, that He who is destroying the first-born might not touch them. (YLT)
...and many more translations. The use of 'lest' in the New King James and other translations carries the kind of impact I believe you have discussed here.
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics13,913
Posts229,430
Members9,182
|
Most Online3,341 Dec 9th, 2011
|
|
0 members (),
610
guests, and
1
robot. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|