Wordsmith Talk |
About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us | |||
Register Log In Wordsmith Talk Forums General Topics Miscellany Merriam-Webster's open dictionary
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Quote:
Bad idea - why? from a marketing standpoint (for the "real" encyclopedia) it's even brilliant, and it may channel some vandals away from wiki![]()
Dunno about either of those ideas, W. The first assumes the particpants in the collaborative version would ever be in the same market segment as the prospective purchasers of the proper version (and my bump tells me they won't, not ever!) The second seems a bit like supposing that taggers with spray cans should be given two walls to deface instead of only one so that it may somehow deter them from defacing the first... oh, hang on, New York tried that already, didn't they?!
Entire Thread Subject Posted By Posted ![]()
Merriam-Webster's open dictionary
tsuwm 01/16/2006 2:27 PM ![]()
Re: Merriam-Webster's open dictionary
Buffalo Shrdlu 01/16/2006 3:50 PM ![]()
Re: Merriam-Webster's open dictionary
maverick 01/16/2006 3:57 PM ![]()
Re: Merriam-Webster's open dictionary
Buffalo Shrdlu 01/16/2006 3:59 PM ![]()
Re: Merriam-Webster's open dictionary
TEd Remington 01/16/2006 4:00 PM ![]()
Re: Merriam-Webster's open dictionary
tsuwm 01/16/2006 6:23 PM ![]()
Re: Merriam-Webster's open dictionary
Jackie 01/17/2006 2:02 AM ![]()
Re: Merriam-Webster's open dictionary
AnnaStrophic 01/17/2006 7:15 AM ![]()
Re: Merriam-Webster's open dictionary
wsieber 01/17/2006 2:57 PM ![]()
Re: Merriam-Webster's open fictionary
maverick 01/17/2006 3:40 PM
Moderated by Jackie
Link Copied to Clipboard
Forum Rules · Mark All Read Contact Us · Forum Help · Wordsmith Talk