#180674 - 12/04/08 08:16 AM
Re: at my sister's, of my sister's.
[Re: BranShea]
|
Pooh-Bah
Registered: 08/13/05
Posts: 2477
Loc: R'lyeh
|
It's called a double genitive ( link). Michael Quinion opines ( link) about it. The MWDEU is also a good reference ( link).
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#180685 - 12/04/08 03:53 PM
Re: at my sister's, of my sister's.
[Re: BranShea]
|
addict
Registered: 10/24/05
Posts: 557
Loc: Dallas, TX
|
... and "my sister's friend".
It works well for "friend" (possibly due to the assumption the friend relationship is reciprocal?). but "A picture of my sister" might depict my sister and belong to me or anyone, while "a picture of my sister's" would show anything and belong to her.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#180686 - 12/04/08 05:48 PM
Re: at my sister's, of my sister's.
[Re: Myridon]
|
Carpal Tunnel
Registered: 06/23/06
Posts: 3764
Loc: Netherlands, the Hague
|
Ha, yes, I see. I see . There is a difference in meaning when you consider the picture sentence. But what is odd is the 's'. A picture of my sister's. The s looks like a leftover from his. "My sister his picture". But then my sister is a her. Then I do understand you can't write or say " my sister'r picture". You could say though: "my brother's picture = " my brother his picture", hey ho ! Sinking deeper and deeper in the mud. 
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#180688 - 12/04/08 08:11 PM
Re: at my sister's, of my sister's.
[Re: BranShea]
|
Carpal Tunnel
Registered: 12/01/00
Posts: 12533
|
A picture of my sister's. The s looks like a leftover from his. "My sister his picture". But then my sister is a her. Then I do understand you can't write or say " my sister'r picture". You could say though: "my brother's picture = " my brother his picture"
This is a commonly held misunderstanding of the origin of the 's possesive marker in English. It really comes from one of the most common OE inflexional endings for the genitive singular.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#180723 - 12/06/08 06:28 PM
Re: at my sister's, of my sister's.
[Re: The Pook]
|
old hand
Registered: 06/23/08
Posts: 1009
Loc: Frozenwastesistan
|
This reminds me of the discussion of earlier this year concerning where do Churches come up with things like: " at St. Bernard's". St. Bernard is dead, cannot be a possessive. Yet even at the Vatican it is St. Peter's Basilica, in London it is St. Paul's. Someone mentioned the 'genitive' case above: which as I understand it, indicates 'possession', yet a dead saint cannot possess a Church, etc.etc.etc. I like Pook's comment: don't expect consistence in the English language.
_________________________
----please, draw me a sheep----
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
7256 Members
16 Forums
12812 Topics
189753 Posts
Max Online: 853 @ 10/23/07 11:39 AM
|
|
|
1 registered (zmjezhd),
27
Guests and
28
Spiders online. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|