"There are some people whom it is one's duty to offend!"
-- Lord Reith.

You, "of troy", repeat yourself without taking into account what meanwhile has been added to the debate. This is infuriating. But I will not repeat MYself. Instead, I will put this imperviousness -- as well as the shambolic quality of your writing and reasoning -- down to your being in some way mentally defective, and accordingly try to show you the compassion and patience you are entitled to.

But for your own benefit “of troy” revisit my post. There, you will see (or, failing this, some sympathetic friend may help you to see) why asking for the joke to be cited was pertinent to the phrase in question, and why your recommendation that I satisfy my penchant for vulgarity elsewhere on the Internet "if that is what interests you" was not only insolent, but obtuse.

The only thing I cannot understand is whether you are really a prig, or whether you simply find the opportunity for pompous moralising irresistible. In my view, it is probably the latter, given that your son is a porn-monger (which, by the way, is as distasteful a confidence to force upon a public message forum as anything a Saigon whore can do to a coke bottle).

It is my opinion that this board is being overzealously administrated. The result is a vitiating atmosphere of overcorrection, politicking, and futile bibble-babble on the question of the legitimacy of posts, rather than the theme’s they present.

Lastly, if a vulgar joke had appeared unsolicited on this board, I would understand the reaction of "of troy" and others; however, in the context of this thread, the reaction is preposterously narrow-minded and childish. As is often the case in such matters, this prudishness is probably an ironic expression of libidinal frustration. The best remedy for this should be obvious, by either natural means, or with a Coke bottle, whichever being the most geographically convenient.