Wordsmith.org: the magic of words

Wordsmith Talk

About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us  

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
#83260 10/10/02 06:06 PM
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 9
L
lander Offline OP
stranger
OP Offline
stranger
L
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 9
I am starting a campaign. For over 30 years, we have struggled, contrived twisted methods of expression, and been in endless, pointless conversations to avoid sexism in our language. I have believed for a long time that the root cause is not sexism. The problem is the lack of a third person, singular, non-gendered, (but not neuter like "it"), personal pronoun in the English language. I've thought about making one up but nothing seems to sound right. He, she, e? Her, him, ? Her, his, ?

The best route may be to borrow from another language. Do you know of such a word(s)? Would you send this to someone who might?



#83261 10/10/02 06:44 PM
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 3,467
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 3,467
Lander:

Welcome to our group.

Why do we NEED a new word? For many years he and his have been expected to bear the burden of she and her(s); what is so darned precious about PCness that we have to shift this burden elsewhere. He and his should be considered masculine OR neuter, as the context requires. And if the ultra feminists don't like that I say we castrate them.

TEd



TEd
#83262 10/10/02 06:48 PM
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 9
L
lander Offline OP
stranger
OP Offline
stranger
L
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 9
That's funny! Refer to he as neuter and then offer to castrate the feminists as well...


#83263 10/10/02 07:07 PM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
If thou'll accept the use of plural pronouns in singular usages thou'll see that we have had thine answer for the last four hundred years or so.


#83264 10/10/02 07:14 PM
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 3,467
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 3,467
OH! Drat. I meant that He should refer to both masculine and feminine, according to the context.



TEd
#83265 10/10/02 07:18 PM
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 9
L
lander Offline OP
stranger
OP Offline
stranger
L
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 9
Perchance, is that thy practice?


#83266 10/10/02 07:22 PM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
thy practice?

You better believe it.


#83267 10/10/02 07:28 PM
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 9
L
lander Offline OP
stranger
OP Offline
stranger
L
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 9
So if I were the administrator of a contest that you just won a million dollars from, and I wasn't sure if Faldage was a male or female, and you were standing among a group of people, you would be ok if I said, "Give it to them."


#83268 10/10/02 07:33 PM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Hey, I wouldn't mind splitting the money with myself.


#83269 10/10/02 07:45 PM
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 9
L
lander Offline OP
stranger
OP Offline
stranger
L
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 9
Seriously, though. Why don't you think what you recommend is common practice?


#83270 10/10/02 07:51 PM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
I think it is common practice and anyone who thinks otherwise can take their marbles and go home.


#83271 10/10/02 07:59 PM
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 872
M
old hand
Offline
old hand
M
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 872

Uh...I know a personal pronoun that doesn't indicate gender Lander, but I hesitate to reveal it. The south-american tribe that began using it is no longer extant.

It seems that, contrary to our popular understanding, sexual interest must be constantly reinforced in order to insure sexual union. These Indians, not having movies and TV, like all of us, needed constant redirectment as to which kind they should pursue, and so when their language failed them, they lost interest in sex and thereby went extinct.

Besides I hold the belief that words should not be manufactured, they should be allowed to spring freely and full blown from the collective mind of their originating culture.

Welcome Lander, good luck with your campaign.




Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,661
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,661
I think it is common practice and anyone who thinks otherwise can take their marbles and go home.

"A culture of one is just as valuable as a culture of one million" - That *person


#83273 10/10/02 08:15 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,400
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,400
re: Besides I hold the belief that words should not be manufactured, they should be allowed to spring freely and full blown from the collective mind of their originating culture.

Milo here is demonstrating how wonderfull both he and english are constitantly inconstistant! or maybe he is claiming to be the voice of the collective mind of our culture... yes, that could be it..

but at least he doesn't agrue that he, or his, or him, or any of the other masculine pronouns are also gender neutral-- something that is rather consistantly done, but it never true.

in english language culture, he is masculine, and to say it is also neutral is a lie.

evenually, we might evolve a new word, (them/they is on its way) but until then, we have a gender bias in english.


Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 3,467
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 3,467
Helen:

Every citizen should pay his taxes. Every citizen should pay her taxes. Every citizen should pay his or her taxes.

For many years (probably several centuries) it has been accepted practice to include his and her in the construction of his in the first sentence above. Now you are saying that is a "lie" or "a false statement purposely put forward as the truth: falsehood."

If I [bold]define[/bold] "he" as including "he and she" when the context requires it and "his" as "including his and her(s): when the context requires it, then it is not a lie to infer that he "is" neutral when we define it to be neutral.

Personally i don't care a fig whether we use she and her(s) but I will not use the abomination: "It is the duty of every citizen to pay his or her taxes."

Why do you call it a lie?

TEd, who is not trying to be argumentative, but simply trying to understand



TEd
#83275 10/10/02 08:55 PM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,661
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,661
Every citizen should pay their taxes, which, in turn, buys them the right to be tax-paying citizens.

Singular (or not) it resolves thy need (real or not). From what I've heard, this ain't the first time we've experienced words being revived. They just need a little hot air.


#83276 10/11/02 01:02 AM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 320
S
enthusiast
Offline
enthusiast
S
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 320
Maybe I'm just too old and cranky, but I could never use they, their or them as a singular pronoun. And as for the he or she or he/she construction, that can force us into abominations such as: "If he or she doesn't pay his or her taxes, the IRS will come after him or her." PC or no PC, I have to go with the masculine forms continuing to be used when gender is irrelevant, as has been the tradition. I wouldn't care if someone used the feminine pronouns instead. I've noticed that some high-school textbooks have made a point of alternating from chapter to chapter. Maybe a bit labored, but no real harm done.


#83277 10/11/02 06:29 AM
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,981
J
jmh Offline
Pooh-Bah
Offline
Pooh-Bah
J
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,981
>Every citizen should pay their taxes, which, in turn, buys them the right to be tax-paying citizens.

I have no problem whatsoever in reading this sentence. It might just be a way of thinking that is different, for those who have problems with this approach. In my case, it is just how I think about people. I find alternatives, such as the use of "he/she" very irritating (it slows down the pace of reading). Alternating uses of “he” and “she” sound highly contrived to me and sometimes make it difficult to follow the thread of what is being said.

I remember once trying say to a woman that I met on a journey that her baby was very beautiful. I suddenly realised that it was difficult in normal conversation to say very much without making an assumption (possibly incorrect) about the sex of the baby or having to ask a question. A question, in itself, might imply that I was having difficulty assessing the gender of the baby. To some, that would be seen as a kind of insult - believe me, I have heard it said. In the end, I got it in the neck because the mother of the baby replied that the baby was not beautiful, he was handsome. I have never been able to think of a baby as handsome, although I'm happy to think that one day her son would be handsome. I can't be bothered saying pleasant things about babies any more - I'll only get it wrong.

In our society where we still ritually exclude people, when I read, "The President of the United States is an important position, he carries responsibility ...." I tend to assume that "he" means "he" until it is proven beyond reasonable doubt not to be the case. That is the problem with our language.



#83278 10/11/02 08:10 AM
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,027
old hand
Offline
old hand
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,027
"The President of the United States..he carries.. "he" means "he"
My feeling has always been: if we try to achieve equality by starting from the language angle, we are putting the cart before the horse, and no progress will be achieved. Who knows, if equality was achieved, would there still be a need for presidents- male, female or neuter??


#83279 10/11/02 09:22 AM
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,981
J
jmh Offline
Pooh-Bah
Offline
Pooh-Bah
J
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,981
>if we try to achieve equality by starting from the language angle

Agreed, but we're not "starting" from the language angle, it just re-inforces the way society used to be at every turn.

On the other hand, of course, if a country were to allow a female leader to get in then they could have their own Maggie Thatcher. http://politics.guardian.co.uk/redbox/story/0,9029,748940,00.html


#83280 10/11/02 09:58 AM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Mostly babies seem to get called it, at least around this part of the world and I can't imagine a reasonable mother* objecting to anyone calling her baby beautiful.

The president example is a little narrow; we've never had a female president. How'd y'all handle that in Ireland, Rube? Or anyone know from Iceland? How do they do it when talking about their president?

*Is that an oxymoron?


#83281 10/11/02 01:09 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,346
F
veteran
Offline
veteran
F
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,346
Every citizen should pay their taxes, which, in turn, buys them the right to be tax-paying citizens

I'd go for this kind of construction, where appropriate. Sometimes sounds a bit stilted (in fact it does here), but I can live with that.

Mind you, with just a little thought you can usually re-work PC sentences into something slightly more palatable:

"Every citizen should pay taxes, which, in turn, buys them the right to be called a tax-paying citizen"


#83282 10/11/02 02:00 PM
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,692
D
dxb Offline
Pooh-Bah
Offline
Pooh-Bah
D
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,692
Since the wording is "...THEIR taxes.." I guess the speaker is referring to direct taxation. Not every citizen is liable to direct taxation, due to very low income perhaps, which means that "Every citizen should pay taxes..." is too sweeping.


#83283 10/11/02 03:23 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,346
F
veteran
Offline
veteran
F
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,346
Doing a Faldage



Here, have my place, David. I'm off to the back of the queue!






#83284 10/11/02 03:57 PM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
have my place, David

The torch has been passed, shona. It's now officially doing a Juan


#83285 10/11/02 08:56 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,346
F
veteran
Offline
veteran
F
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,346
The torch has been passed

That's as may be, nunclage, but I've bagsied a place on that big comfy couch right at the back of the line

And if you don't want second place, dxb is, I think, a most worthy understudy to the Juan.


#83286 10/11/02 11:30 PM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
a most worthy understudy

That'd be up to Juan. I'm retired.


#83287 10/12/02 03:20 AM
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,189
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,189
Here, now, what's all this faldagery going on with my good "name"? It's all very clear as cited in the dictionary section of the Ithaca Encyclopedia of Nit. You can't retire from, or relinquish, an inherent power, Faldage...you ARE, now and forevermore, the Nit King! O fearsome King of Nit, I bow before, and light years away from, your fearsome and omnipotent powers. Shona and me merely jesters and/or pages in your esteemed court...and that's all we can ever hope to be. Now here's the dictionary citation for all to see:

faldage: n. (origin: "a Cubs fan in New York" ) : 1. a miniscule, and sometimes presumptuous, dissection of formulas, phrases, historical facts, and any data in general, but usually directed at linguistic discussions.( ~he's a real faldage when it comes to picking nits!) 2. nit-knacker; nit-knackery; nit-knacking 3. v. to nit-knack; demonstrating a knack for picking nits ( ~he faldaged all through that citation!)



Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,289
B
veteran
Offline
veteran
B
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,289
Forgive me for derailing Won and Faldage's twaddle and getting back on the track of this interesting thread.

It seems that this love of things PC, which above all seems to catch the attention of TV people, is getting so out of hand that no one wants to use a gender-specific word even when it's justified. Several times in the last month or so, I have heard TV announcers use "their" when referring to members of a group composed entirely of mothers, female lawyers, male prison inmates, etc.


#83289 10/12/02 02:17 PM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
you ARE, now and forevermore, the Nit King!

As is the line between insanity and genius, that between nitpickery and conceptual detection is exceeding thin.


#83290 10/12/02 03:33 PM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,661
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,661
...is too sweeping.

Who says there's anything wrong with picking nits? Conceptual detection, on the other hand...

------------------

Who knows, if equality was achieved, would there still be a need for presidents- male, female or neuter??

But... but... but... we ARE equal, which, of course, explains why, no matter *whom is in office, nobody "can't get no - satisfaction".


#83291 10/12/02 04:20 PM
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,189
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,189
As is the line between insanity and genius, that between nitpickery and conceptual detection is exceeding thin.

Granted, good sir. But just remember the old adage:

You can't have your nit, and pick it too!

And, Boby...you mean shona is exempt from twaddling!

(and just to show that I'm a worthy apprentice, Faldage, Sire...exceedingly).



#83292 10/12/02 05:02 PM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,661
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,661
...exceedingly).

...but Juan, that changes the whole *meaning of the sentence.


#83293 10/12/02 05:10 PM
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,773
Pooh-Bah
Offline
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,773
lander, I too have often wished for a nongendered set of pronouns. I don't like to use the plural pronouns as substitutes when they are being used to signify a singular; I don't like the awkwardness of the he-or-she construction; I don't like the default of the singular masculine pronoun when the noun might be feminine, although I use it for lack of an alternative.

I have mentally substituted "che" for "he or she". It seems like one could similarly tweek him-or-her, his-or-hers. Herm and hez?

Good luck.


Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
changes the whole *meaning

Thank you, musick. You've given me a whole new understanding of the phrase passing strange. I stick by my usage.


#83295 10/12/02 06:38 PM
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 2,204
R
Pooh-Bah
Offline
Pooh-Bah
R
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 2,204
It is only in writing that it really shows up, though.
I regularly talk to students about how they should deal with their tutors, and how they should consider who is the author of the bookk they are reading (this, in study skill classes), As both authors and tutors come in any possible variety of genders, I regularly refer to he-or-she, him-or-her-, his-or-hers in my lectures and never see any adversxe reaction from my audience (and this is often in groups as small as six or eight, where body-language feedback is very apparent.)

However, I do agree that in written language, it is obtrusive, if so written. As shona says, a little thought will permit you to write these things in reasonably smooth English, most of the time.


#83296 10/12/02 07:27 PM
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,189
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,189
And there was a practice adopted for awhile, and still in use by some non-fiction authors, to use he/him and she/her intermittently in whole sections of the text, pointing this out to the reader in the prologue as being done in "the interests of fairness". But this practice always seemed awkward and heavy-handed to me. Now, it seems, this gender-doubling of pronouns has largely faded from use.


And BTW...third person or third perdaughter?

#83297 10/13/02 09:18 PM
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,146
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,146
I agree with Rhuby and the moll from Michigan that the awkwardness caused by a lack of non-specific pronouns is most apparent in writing. Well, when you're trying to be PC, that is. When I was lecturing I tried a number of approaches. The one I found worked the best for me was to spread it 50/50 between "his" and "her".



The idiot also known as Capfka ...
#83298 10/14/02 01:44 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,346
F
veteran
Offline
veteran
F
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,346
...you mean shona is exempt from twaddling!

But of course, Juanage. I never get sidetracked or veer away from the thread's true purpose, especially in Q&A [innocence]

I'm a North-going Zax, make North-going tracks..

Well.. It's a fair cop. Cuff me, Danno.


As a form of atonement, please allow me to promote the Spartan use of invented PC terms for 3rd-person singular. Let's have a little competition.





#83299 10/15/02 02:21 PM
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 9
L
lander Offline OP
stranger
OP Offline
stranger
L
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 9
I agree that there is a substantial biological and cultural dimension to this. It would seem that in all language groups, distinguishing between male and female when referring to persons is important, if not critical.

As to manufactured words, I guess we'll have to take Shakespeare to task... eponymous unum =;-]


#83300 10/15/02 02:34 PM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,526
veteran
Offline
veteran
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,526

The one I found worked the best for me was to spread it 50/50 between "his" and "her".


I like this approach and have tried it previously, but it leaves me unsatisfied. What I now do is alternate not between successive references, but between chapters or sections. For a single piece, I seldom alternate, but will usually stick with whatever reference I first use.


k



#83301 10/15/02 02:49 PM
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 161
V
member
Offline
member
V
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 161
English speakers shouldn’t be complaining, really. at least you don't have an indication of the gender in verbs. In Russian you can easily tell the gender if a verb is in Past tense. I always got trapped by it in chats when I don't want people to know my gender - sooner or later I say: I did feminine


#83302 10/16/02 02:01 PM
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,156
B
old hand
Offline
old hand
B
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,156
It would seem that in all language groups, distinguishing between male and female when referring to persons is important, if not critical.

I guess not all languages do it. In Turkish the third person singular is just one word, used for males, females, or objects. This has caused great confusion for my Turkish friend who's learning English. We constantly argue about whether or not it's terribly useful to know the gender of the person you're referring to by a pronoun (she, of course, argues it's irrelevant). When she's excited and talks fast, she just picks random pronouns, so she'll say sentences like "I was talking to my mother yesterday and he said..." Eventually you get into the habit of filtering this out.


#83303 10/16/02 02:27 PM
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 9
L
lander Offline OP
stranger
OP Offline
stranger
L
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 9
Funny!

What is the Turkish word? Are there subject, object, possessive variations? If used for objects, does that mean its neuter as well?

thanks, Lander


#83304 10/16/02 02:33 PM
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,156
B
old hand
Offline
old hand
B
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,156
What is the Turkish word?

Ha, well, see, I managed to avoid mentioning it because I've forgotten it, and my Turkish book is at home, and I am at school/work* right now. I think (and please don't quote me on this) the personal pronoun is on. And yes, I recall seeing a table for the different forms (possessive, etc.), and the third person singular was always a single word, never a masculine/femminine form. I think the whole thing is intrinsically neuter. You refer to a table the same way as you refer to your brother. I promise I'll look it up tonight.

BTW, welcome aBoard, lander! (Is it Lander or iander? Switch the cases I used and you'll see they both look the same!) EDIT: I see I'm an idiot, or just blind, because you capitalized it above. D'oh!

* school = work when you are a graduate student


#83305 10/16/02 03:48 PM
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 6
H
stranger
Offline
stranger
H
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 6
The Turkish word is "o". This designation is also puzzling when you are reading, for example a short story on love. When the characters are addressed as "o" and gender specific details are not given, there is no compulsory heterosexuality and a higher level of abstraction is possible.


#83306 10/16/02 04:00 PM
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,156
B
old hand
Offline
old hand
B
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,156
Thanks, hatish! Having only a nodding acquaintance with Turkish means that I forget the details very easily. I thought of "o" but then remembered it means "that that" and so managed to confuse myself.

(However, I can sing a Turkish children's song about a little frog if anyone would care to listen...)


#83307 10/16/02 04:22 PM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
sing a Turkish children's song about a little frog

Oh, please do.

The Scandinavian languages in general (Icelandic is an exception) have conflated masculine and feminine into the animate gender but this conflation seems to have bypassed the personal pronouns.


#83308 10/16/02 06:28 PM
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 9
L
lander Offline OP
stranger
OP Offline
stranger
L
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 9
why do people on the board put words into white (so that they can barely be read)? and what does the * mean?


#83309 10/16/02 06:50 PM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Highlight the white words and they're easy to read (with most browsers). We do it for several reasons. It might be because we are hiding the words from all but a select group or it might be because we feel the content is something that some among us would not like staring them in the face. Sometimes it is because it is something that is not the main thrust of what we are trying to say and we don't want it to distract from the main message. In this last, it is something of a step beyond parenthetical. The star *before a word indicates emphasis but less emphasis than stars *around* a word. The latter isn't used much on this board; we usually bold or italicize. Italicizing is more normally used when we wish a word to be considered as the word itself and not to indicate the meaning behind the word.

Got that?

If so, I'll try to explain it again


#83310 10/16/02 07:00 PM
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 9
L
lander Offline OP
stranger
OP Offline
stranger
L
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 9
This from a friend who speaks Mandarin.

The HE, SHE pronouns are written differently, but said the same. Verbally, no one can tell the difference.
The word is pronounced "ta". It means he, she and it. It is it's own possessive, objective and subjective variations. All of those tenses are other words added later in a sentence. It works.

As an aside, the way that the mandarin "we/us" is pronounced is "woman".



#83311 10/17/02 01:14 PM
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 10,539
Likes: 1
W
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
W
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 10,539
Likes: 1
Didn't James Thurber write a book "The Wonderful O" ?

And halfway through the letter o disappears from the alphabet, so that "Ophelia Oliver couldn't go out of doors..."

A quick google search reveals that it was even made into a musical! http://alt.venus.co.uk/weed/music/salliterri/wondero.htm...never knew that, but somehow the cynic in me suspects that the book was better)


Page 1 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6

Moderated by  Jackie 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics13,913
Posts229,328
Members9,182
Most Online3,341
Dec 9th, 2011
Newest Members
Ineffable, ddrinnan, TRIALNERRA, befuddledmind, KILL_YOUR_SUV
9,182 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 783 guests, and 0 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days)
Top Posters
wwh 13,858
Faldage 13,803
Jackie 11,613
tsuwm 10,542
wofahulicodoc 10,539
LukeJavan8 9,916
AnnaStrophic 6,511
Wordwind 6,296
of troy 5,400
Disclaimer: Wordsmith.org is not responsible for views expressed on this site. Use of this forum is at your own risk and liability - you agree to hold Wordsmith.org and its associates harmless as a condition of using it.

Home | Today's Word | Yesterday's Word | Subscribe | FAQ | Archives | Search | Feedback
Wordsmith Talk | Wordsmith Chat

© 1994-2024 Wordsmith

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5