Wordsmith.org: the magic of words

Wordsmith Talk

About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us  

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 5 of 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 10
#80483 - 09/16/02 01:55 PM Re: decimate  
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 13,858
wwh Offline
Carpal Tunnel
wwh  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 13,858
An interesting point, Faldage, that I've not heard before. I wish I could be sure
that the people who use the term for total distruction were thinking of that.
Too bad the Romans didn't call it "delendation".


#80484 - 09/16/02 02:02 PM Re: decimate  
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Faldage Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Faldage  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
People who use the term decimate in its modern sense of large-scale destruction are using it the way they have heard others use it and in a way that they expect people to understand based on the fact that that is the way others use it. If meaning did not shift then silly would be a compliment and nice an insult.


#80485 - 09/16/02 02:30 PM Re: nuke'em  
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 320
slithy toves Offline
enthusiast
slithy toves  Offline
enthusiast

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 320
Sarasota, Florida, US
I regret using slippery slope. It's one of those trendy phrases I generally try to avoid. Just slipped out.


#80486 - 09/16/02 03:44 PM Re: nuke'em  
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,692
dxb Offline
Pooh-Bah
dxb  Offline
Pooh-Bah

Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,692
UK
I know a couple of people who consistently say “brought” when they mean bought. This despite a lifetime of having heard the correct word used. This mistake, although not common, is sometimes heard around the London area – I haven’t heard it anywhere else. This causes me to stumble mentally every time I hear it as does the word nuclear pronounced as nucular. What happens is that for a time I am distracted from the message by the pronunciation. Others here obviously also find that to be the case.

So what we have is the most powerful man in the world's most powerful country trying to give us what he sees as a powerful message, but a good many of his listeners are being distracted from the message by his speech mannerisms! That has to be undesirable. Those of his listeners who themselves say "nucular" would not be upset or think any the less of him were he to pronounce the word properly, so the effect is all negative for him.

Certainly language is all about communication and it changes and develops with common usage, but that can only be through a popular trend (carefully avoids using "slippery slope"!). Whether a pronunciation or usage has become “accepted” can only be assessed by a body that is generally recognised as suitably qualified, and to see what is accepted right now one would, at least I would, refer to a number of well-known dictionaries. They will not suggest the use of brought for bought or nucular as a way to pronounce nuclear because right now those are not accepted.

So lets resist the trends that we find unpalatable or ugly to try to prevent them from becoming accepted!

dxb.



#80487 - 09/16/02 04:08 PM Re: nuke'em  
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Faldage Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Faldage  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
They will not suggest the use of brought for bought or nucular as a way to pronounce nuclear because right now those are not accepted.

Suggesting one use a pronunciation and dismissing someone for using that pronunciation are two entirely different things.


#80488 - 09/16/02 04:17 PM Re: nuke'em  
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,296
Wordwind Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Wordwind  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,296
Piedmont Region of Virginia, U...
I like the point, however, about incorrect pronunciation causing a distraction.

It's difficult enough to follow the path some speeches take without throwing obstacles in the way, such as mispronunciations.

If the mispronunciations go with the flow of, say, an obviously humorous part of the speech, well, great. We're in that groove with the speaker.

But if the mispronunciations are part of a serious speech we're trying to take seriously, the speech finally isn't as effective.

What is the good of cluttering up a serious speech with mispronunciations, Faldage? Really. What good comes of mispronounced words?


#80489 - 09/16/02 04:21 PM Re: nuke'em  
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,692
dxb Offline
Pooh-Bah
dxb  Offline
Pooh-Bah

Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,692
UK
Faldage, I was not suggesting that anyone should be dismissed.

dxb


#80490 - 09/16/02 04:22 PM Re: nuke'em  
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Faldage Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Faldage  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
not suggesting that anyone should be dismissed

You weren't but.


#80491 - 09/16/02 04:24 PM Re: nuke'em  
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,692
dxb Offline
Pooh-Bah
dxb  Offline
Pooh-Bah

Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,692
UK
But what? But me no buts - be specific, not coy.

dxb


#80492 - 09/16/02 04:39 PM Re: nuke'em  
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Faldage Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Faldage  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
What good comes of mispronounced words?

I hear people pronouncing either as "eye-ther" and it takes some effort for me not to assume they are putting on airs. People who don't think of "nucular" as being anything but the standard way of pronouncing the word probably don't spend a lot of time on the web nattering on about it* but they may well feel that those who do pronounce it correctly are a little bit stuffy.


*What does this say about the relative levels of intelligence?


Page 5 of 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 10

Moderated by  Jackie 

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics13,879
Posts223,983
Members9,024
Most Online3,341
Dec 9th, 2011
Newest Members
TFED1, mark18, PureTech, Dilys, Abishek
9024 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 61 guests, and 1 spider.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days)
Dilys 1
mark18 1
Top Posters(All Time)
wwh 13,858
Faldage 13,803
Jackie 11,613
tsuwm 10,538
LukeJavan8 8,999
AnnaStrophic 6,511
Wordwind 6,296
of troy 5,400
Disclaimer: Wordsmith.org is not responsible for views expressed on this site. Use of this forum is at your own risk and liability - you agree to hold Wordsmith.org and its associates harmless as a condition of using it.

Home | Today's Word | Yesterday's Word | Subscribe | FAQ | Archives | Search | Feedback
Wordsmith Talk | Wordsmith Chat

© 1994-2017 Wordsmith

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.016s Queries: 13 (0.004s) Memory: 2.7369 MB (Peak: 2.8692 MB) Zlib disabled. Server Time: 2017-10-17 11:38:19 UTC