|
|
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 833
old hand
|
OP
old hand
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 833 |
Keiva wonders about the origin of "You're all wet!" in another post, and it brought to my mind another expression that means someone is naive or inexperienced: Greenhorn. But why greenhorn? Anyone know? Bovine origins? I never seen no cow wit green horns, no never. Edit: this baby pretty quickly got shanghaied by the uniform debaters so I thought I would edit the title so people could remember where to find that scintillating discussion....! 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
Carpal Tunnel
|
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613 |
From The Word Detective:
A "greenhorn" is simply a newcomer or inexperienced person, especially a novice in a trade or business. "Greenhorn" first appeared back in the 15th century meaning a young ox with new, or "green," horns. ("Green" has been used as a metaphor for "young" or "inexperienced," by analogy to a young plant, for hundreds of years.) By about 1650, "greenhorn" was being applied to newly-enlisted army recruits, and shortly thereafter "greenhorn" came to mean any inexperienced person. Unfortunately, since the naive among us can easily be hornswoggled, "greenhorn" can also sometimes mean "sucker" or "simpleton."
Still, I'd rather be thought a "greenhorn" than a "tinhorn," which since the late 19th century has been slang for a pretentious and flashy but cheap and contemptible person. The original "tinhorns" were "tinhorn gamblers" in the Old West, addicted to a low-stakes game called "Chuck-a-luck," in which dice were tumbled in a small metal contraption known as a "tin horn." Serious gamblers looked down on such "tinhorn gamblers," and by the end of the 19th century "tinhorn" had come into general usage as an adjective meaning "cheap" and "contemptible." A similar adjective, "tin-pot" (often heard in phrases such as "tin-pot dictator"), arose in the early 19th century by analogy to the perceived shoddiness of tin cookware.
I first looked in Brewer's Phrase and Fable. They didn't have greenhorn, but they did have the following entry, whose def. made no sense to me at all:
Green Linnets The 39th Foot, so called from the colour of their facings. Now the Dorsetshire, and the facings are white.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 144
member
|
|
member
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 144 |
Green Linnets The 39th Foot, so called from the colour of their facings. Now the Dorsetshire, and the facings are white.
____________
Army reference - 39th Foot (presumably regiment) which had green facings on their uniforms. A number of regiments have been amalgamated over the years, so I guess that's what happened to the 39th Foot who had to give up their green facings when they became the Dorsetshire and adopt the new white ones.
As to Greenhorns, I would probably say that someone was 'still wet behind the ears'.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,065
Carpal Tunnel
|
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,065 |
Jackie is puzzled by: In reply to:
Green Linnets The 39th Foot, so called from the colour of their facings. Now the Dorsetshire, and the facings are white.
The 39th Foot is a regiment, which was later called the Dorsetshire. Facings are part of their uniform: the frilly bits at the front of eighteenth and nineteenth century (?) soldiers' uniforms, I think. Rhuby, when did khaki come in? Something at the back of my mind is saying Boer War.
Bingley
Bingley
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,189
Carpal Tunnel
|
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,189 |
I've often confused these two terms, and I'm sure other folks have too. Tinhorn originally referred to gamblers, usually in the Old American (US) West, who were pretentious braggarts but who were unskilled and ineffective. And sometimes, it seems to me, the term was used to imply a new or naive gambler, especially in some of the old Hollywood Westerns, so this could be the cause for the two words being used interchangeably in some quarters. This is from American Heritage: SYLLABICATION: tin·horn
PRONUNCIATION: tnhôrn
NOUN: Slang A petty braggart who pretends to be rich and important.
ETYMOLOGY: From the horn-shaped metal can used by chuck-a-luck operators for shaking the dice.
OTHER FORMS: tinhorn —ADJECTIVEAnd here's a great discussion on the origins of tinhorn and greenhorn, and how they may have acquired a shared meaning, from Quinion: http://www.quinion.com/words/qa/qa-tin2.htm
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,542
Carpal Tunnel
|
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,542 |
I seem to recall Green Linnet as being a record label (company) which specialized in Celtic music -- and wondered about the genesis of the name. http://home.mn.rr.com/wwftd/
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 2,204
Pooh-Bah
|
|
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 2,204 |
Absolutely right, Bingley. Red uniforms were just too easy to hit under those conditions, whereas khaki tended to blend with the colour of the veldt. Not that that actually seems to have prevented the Boer sharpshooters from wreaking havoc among the Brit Army by there very accurate shooting.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,400
Carpal Tunnel
|
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,400 |
your right tsuwm, green linnet is record label, and yes they specialize in celtic music, they also have a picture of a green linnet on there catalog, and on their labels.
as for why they chose the name, i remember reading about it once in one of there catalogs, but i have totally forgot why. i'll go look and see if they have a web site, and if it gives an explaination.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,189
Carpal Tunnel
|
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,189 |
red uniforms:
Red uniforms were just too easy to hit under those conditions
Interesting, Rhuby...I was ruminating this point just last night while watching a historical film about the Seven Years War. I was wondering when did the British Army become the Redcoats, and who decided that wearing red in the days of open-field warfare was a good idea? Wearing that color was like having a bullseye hanging around your neck despite the notorious inaccuracy of the weapons of the day (which gave true meaning to the term "pot-shot"). Surely they must've realized that green or brown uniforms would have blended in with the background more and made the marching ranks a far more difficult target. Or did they value so little the lives of the enlisted men in those days that they just didn't care? (although the officers wore the same color) Does anyone know the history of the British Army adopting red uniforms as their rule of dress?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,094
old hand
|
|
old hand
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,094 |
red uniforms
Well, it's one of the colors in the British flag, but red is in almost every flag, so that probably doesn't mean anything.
My guess is that it was intended to conceal blood. Doctors (or is it just the patients) today wear those ugly green smocks. The reason for that color is that it's the exact compliment of the color of blood. When the two mix they visually neutralize, making the blood less obvious, I guess. At least that's what they told us in a lecture on color for architecture.
|
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics13,913
Posts229,316
Members9,182
| |
Most Online3,341
Dec 9th, 2011
|
|
|
1 members (wofahulicodoc),
604
guests, and
2
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
