Wordsmith.org: the magic of words

Wordsmith Talk

About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us  

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 9 of 10 1 2 7 8 9 10
#42658 - 10/06/01 02:00 PM Re: Gender and Articles  
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,605
Keiva Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Keiva  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,605
The woman(1) and its(1) dog(2)* went shopping, and it(1) bought a pair of new knickers.
Now, isn't that much more neat and tidy and totally understandable? Why can't all English be as clear and easy to follow, hmmm?

But CapK, your reconstuction only works because of the specific facts of that particular sentence. It wouldn't work, for example, with:
The woman(1) and its husband went shopping, and it bought a pair of new pants.
Whose pants would they be: a pair of "his" pants, or "hers" pants? Whichever you say, how would you alter the sentence if you intended to say the opposite? Yes, it can be done, but only with awkwardness.



#42659 - 10/07/01 04:17 AM Re: Gender and Articles  
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,146
Capital Kiwi Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Capital Kiwi  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,146
Northamptonshire, England
But using my method you wouldn't write it that way. Any formal language must make its references absolutely clear. Therefore you would write (or say):

The woman(1) and its husband(2) went shopping, and it(1) bought a pair of new pants.

There you are - clear as a bell! Where's your problem?




The idiot also known as Capfka ...
#42660 - 10/07/01 12:22 PM Re: Gender and Articles  
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,605
Keiva Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Keiva  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,605
But consider some further implications:

If the woman is the purchaser you must say,
The woman and its husband went shopping, and it bought a pair of new pants.
While if the man is the purchaser, you must say,
The man and its wife went shopping, and it bought a pair of new pants.

This creates at least two problems.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
First, you can't gracefully handle a more complex situation, where the second clause covers both people. Such as
The woman and her husband went shopping, and she bought him a new pair of pants. or
The woman and its husband went shopping, and he bought a shirt while she bought pants.
If you lack gender-specific pronouns, you must resort to clumsy substitution of "the former" and "the latter".
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Second and more important: even in the simpler sentences, your phrasing of the first clause commits you to the meaning of the second, even before the second is uttered. Imagine the difficulty in an ongoing conversation, where each idea leads to another. E.g., two women chatting:

"Marge and John went shopping."
"Where?"
"At the mall. There was a *delicious sale."
"Did they buy anything?"
"Yes, it bought a new pair of pants."

"Who did? I can't remember exactly how you phrased your first sentence before."
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Doesn't gender in pronouns make it far easier to minimize such confusion?


#42661 - 10/08/01 02:59 AM Re: Gender and Articles  
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,065
Bingley Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Bingley  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,065
Jakarta
The Indonesian third-person singular pronoun dia is common to both genders. They're quite happy to repeat the noun if there is any ambiguity.

Bingley


Bingley
#42662 - 10/08/01 06:48 AM Re: Gender and Articles  
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,146
Capital Kiwi Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Capital Kiwi  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,146
Northamptonshire, England
Keiva, I think you're missing my point.



The idiot also known as Capfka ...
#42663 - 10/08/01 02:55 PM Re: Da point  
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,605
Keiva Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Keiva  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,605
Could be, boss Cap'n! I can tell you, though, that I often become confused by wife's conversation, with trouble following whom she means when she refers to "he" or "she" when telling me of a story with multiple he's and she's. I shudder to think how hopelessly befuddled I'd be if all the he's and she's were replaced by it's, leaving out even the gender-clue to meaning.

But then, I befuddle easily!


#42664 - 10/09/01 04:20 AM Re: Da point  
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,065
Bingley Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Bingley  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,065
Jakarta
According to David Crystal's Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language some languages have fourth person forms. The example he gives is from Cree where if you are speaking of two male characters, one would be na:pe:w and the other na:pewa . Would that help?

Bingley


Bingley
#42665 - 10/09/01 11:20 AM Re: Gender and Articles  
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,156
Bean Offline
old hand
Bean  Offline
old hand

Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,156
The woman(1) and its husband went shopping, and it bought a pair of new pants.

We already have an equally confusing type of sentence, with no contrived pronoun-switching:

The woman and her sister went shopping, and she bought a new pair of pants.

Who did? (Probably "the woman".) We can usually manage to work it out when we actually use such a sentence in real life.

Having gender-specific pronouns in English only helps in some cases. Anyway, Turkish has the non-gender specific pronoun thing - only "it" - no "he" or "she". So I've become used to my Turkish friend referring to her mother as "he" and her husband as "she" occasionally - it breaks the flow when she stops to think about the pronoun - and I know her well enough to interpolate the errors. I am inclined to see her side of the argument...the "he" and "she" don't necessarily clear things up all the time! Try going to an all-girls' school! All your stories degenerate into "her" and "she", with much extra clarification needed.


#42666 - 10/09/01 02:35 PM Re: Formal language, Schmormal language!  
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Faldage Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Faldage  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
If I catch you throwing numbers around like that when you're talking to me in a pub, I'm sending you right back to Zild! The hard way!


#42667 - 10/09/01 08:43 PM Re: Formal language, Schmormal language!  
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,146
Capital Kiwi Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Capital Kiwi  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,146
Northamptonshire, England
If I catch you throwing numbers around like that when you're talking to me in a pub, I'm sending you right back to Zild! The hard way!

Will I be able to get my tongue out of my cheek first, sah?



The idiot also known as Capfka ...
Page 9 of 10 1 2 7 8 9 10

Moderated by  Jackie 

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics13,877
Posts223,572
Members9,002
Most Online3,341
Dec 9th, 2011
Newest Members
Aladitya_khan, JdawgGaming, Hiteshi, JaneJane, Baldilocks
9002 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 37 guests, and 3 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days)
Top Posters(All Time)
wwh 13,858
Faldage 13,803
Jackie 11,613
tsuwm 10,538
LukeJavan8 8,873
AnnaStrophic 6,511
Wordwind 6,296
of troy 5,400
Disclaimer: Wordsmith.org is not responsible for views expressed on this site. Use of this forum is at your own risk and liability - you agree to hold Wordsmith.org and its associates harmless as a condition of using it.

Home | Today's Word | Yesterday's Word | Subscribe | FAQ | Archives | Search | Feedback
Wordsmith Talk | Wordsmith Chat

© 1994-2017 Wordsmith

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.014s Queries: 13 (0.004s) Memory: 2.7348 MB (Peak: 2.8669 MB) Zlib disabled. Server Time: 2017-05-24 23:33:30 UTC