Wordsmith.org: the magic of words

Wordsmith Talk

About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us  

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 6 of 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
#209632 - 02/19/13 03:00 PM Re: Determinism [Re: Faldage]  
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,554
jenny jenny Offline
veteran
jenny jenny  Offline
veteran

Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,554
Lower Aberdeen, Mississippi
Originally Posted By: Faldage
I ain't sayin' nothin' no mo'.
Thank you, Faldage. A lesser man would not have made an announcement.

Back to Determinism:

Each person if honest can prove to himself that he (or she) is a robot by simple introspection. Sex, food and drink are biological directives not options. The experincing organism -meaning you- perceives the lack of these biological imperatives as displeasure and their realization as pleasure.
We all know this but pretend that we are in charge.

#209640 - 02/19/13 06:23 PM Re: Determinism [Re: zmjezhd]  
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,554
jenny jenny Offline
veteran
jenny jenny  Offline
veteran

Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,554
Lower Aberdeen, Mississippi
Originally Posted By: zmjezhd
So, before the big bang there was something???

So, think some cosmologists. There are theories of multiple big bangs. Multiple universes, too. Not everybody agrees.


I agree, zmjezhd. Cosmologies are suspect because there are so many of them. Oscillating and multiverse constructs seem rooted in mumbo-jumbo math otherwise someone would outshine Einstein.

#209644 - 02/19/13 08:47 PM Re: Determinism [Re: jenny jenny]  
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,295
BranShea Offline
Carpal Tunnel
BranShea  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,295
Netherlands, the Hague
5) Nothing can't beget something.

Even nothing is something, we cannot imagine 'nothing' nor the end of ends.

#209646 - 02/19/13 11:03 PM Re: Determinism [Re: BranShea]  
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,554
jenny jenny Offline
veteran
jenny jenny  Offline
veteran

Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,554
Lower Aberdeen, Mississippi
Originally Posted By: BranShea
5) Nothing can't beget something.

Even nothing is something, we cannot imagine 'nothing' nor the end of ends.

BranShe, you agree and disagree with me in the same post, and strangely I end up agreeing with both. crazy

#209662 - 02/20/13 02:07 PM Re: fatalism [Re: jenny jenny]  
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,290
zmjezhd Offline
Carpal Tunnel
zmjezhd  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,290
R'lyeh
Oscillating and multiverse constructs seem rooted in mumbo-jumbo math otherwise someone would outshine Einstein.

Not sure that "mumbo-jumbo math" has a meaning that I can glean. Math is math. Non-Euclidean geometry is still math. I'm not sure that, say, the math behind figuring out the speed of a falling object explains anything about objects or gravity, but it works and can be used for something. I'll take string theory and multiverse cosmologies over the bearded guy in the sky explanation. If nothing they are more aesthetically pleasing.


Ceci n'est pas un seing.
#209666 - 02/20/13 06:01 PM Re: Determinism [Re: jenny jenny]  
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,295
BranShea Offline
Carpal Tunnel
BranShea  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,295
Netherlands, the Hague
Originally Posted By: jenny jenny
Originally Posted By: BranShea
5) Nothing can't beget something.

Even nothing is something, we cannot imagine 'nothing' nor the end of ends.

BranShe, you agree and disagree with me in the same post, and strangely I end up agreeing with both. crazy
Then could you agree with me that nothing can beget something? ( which contradicts your fifth amendment?) laugh

#209686 - 02/21/13 02:11 PM Re: Determinism [Re: BranShea]  
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,554
jenny jenny Offline
veteran
jenny jenny  Offline
veteran

Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,554
Lower Aberdeen, Mississippi
Originally Posted By: BranShea
Originally Posted By: jenny jenny
Originally Posted By: BranShea
5) Nothing can't beget something.

Even nothing is something, we cannot imagine 'nothing' nor the end of ends.

BranShe, you agree and disagree with me in the same post, and strangely I end up agreeing with both. crazy
Then could you agree with me that nothing can beget something? ( which contradicts your fifth amendment?) laugh

Now BranShea (may I call you BS?) you tease me - you well know that all "nothings" are not the same. e.g.
Nothing can become something and nothing can become something are yin and yang - exact opposites. A good ear connected to a good mind will understand this.

#209687 - 02/21/13 02:49 PM Re: Determinism [Re: jenny jenny]  
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,295
BranShea Offline
Carpal Tunnel
BranShea  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,295
Netherlands, the Hague
I confess. Just teasing (bad habit). It was too tempting and not seriously taken I hope. smile

BC 's fine.

#209696 - 02/21/13 07:38 PM Re: fatalism [Re: zmjezhd]  
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,554
jenny jenny Offline
veteran
jenny jenny  Offline
veteran

Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,554
Lower Aberdeen, Mississippi
Originally Posted By: zmjezhd
Not sure that "mumbo-jumbo math" has a meaning that I can glean. Math is math. Non-Euclidean geometry is still math. I'm not sure that, say, the math behind figuring out the speed of a falling object explains anything about objects or gravity, but it works and can be used for something. I'll take string theory and multiverse cosmologies over the bearded guy in the sky explanation. If nothing they are more aesthetically pleasing.
Yes, zmjezhd, I agree, like language math has a function. Yet math, like language, is fuzzy in outline mainly because in our Universe there are no two identical entities to add...or subtract...or muliply, even if that difference is only its unique position in time/space.
And I know of no religion that believes God is a bearded or not bearded guy sitting or standing in a sky or not sky Heaven.
Except symbolically.

#209702 - 02/22/13 03:59 AM Determinism pt, 2 The secret sharer [Re: jenny jenny]  
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,554
jenny jenny Offline
veteran
jenny jenny  Offline
veteran

Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,554
Lower Aberdeen, Mississippi
Since the Faldage saw fit to recuse himself from this ad hoc court I will hereby give the high points of the book he just read but refuses to review. I list the salient points below.

1) When driving and texting or listening to a ball game or just deep thinking; who is doing the driving?
2) A name you couldn't remember suddenly pops into your head. How?
3) Who is dreaming when you dream?

The answer is your undermind. You, your ego, your operating clichés, etc. are merely servo- mechanisms for the real you - your subconscious mind.
He, not you, is driving.

Page 6 of 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Moderated by  Jackie 

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics13,879
Posts223,988
Members9,024
Most Online3,341
Dec 9th, 2011
Newest Members
TFED1, mark18, PureTech, Dilys, Abishek
9024 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 56 guests, and 3 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days)
Dilys 1
mark18 1
Top Posters(All Time)
wwh 13,858
Faldage 13,803
Jackie 11,613
tsuwm 10,538
LukeJavan8 9,001
AnnaStrophic 6,511
Wordwind 6,296
of troy 5,400
Disclaimer: Wordsmith.org is not responsible for views expressed on this site. Use of this forum is at your own risk and liability - you agree to hold Wordsmith.org and its associates harmless as a condition of using it.

Home | Today's Word | Yesterday's Word | Subscribe | FAQ | Archives | Search | Feedback
Wordsmith Talk | Wordsmith Chat

© 1994-2017 Wordsmith

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.015s Queries: 14 (0.004s) Memory: 2.7394 MB (Peak: 2.8775 MB) Zlib disabled. Server Time: 2017-10-19 03:45:37 UTC