Wordsmith.org: the magic of words

Wordsmith Talk

About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us  

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
#205843 - 05/22/12 10:09 AM Reverse Alphabetical  
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 2
tomtransmitting Offline
stranger
tomtransmitting  Offline
stranger

Joined: May 2012
Posts: 2
KZN
Surely - surely - there is a word that means "in reverse alphabetical order"?

#205844 - 05/22/12 11:06 AM Re: Reverse Alphabetical [Re: tomtransmitting]  
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Faldage Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Faldage  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
¿Por qué?

#205845 - 05/22/12 05:55 PM Re: Reverse Alphabetical [Re: tomtransmitting]  
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,538
tsuwm Offline
Carpal Tunnel
tsuwm  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,538
this too shall pass
Urban Dictionary suggests 'omegabetical' (heh) and 'zalphabetical' (ecch) - but then who gives any credence to the UD?!

#205846 - 05/22/12 10:33 PM Re: Reverse Alphabetical [Re: tomtransmitting]  
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Faldage Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Faldage  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Omegapsical might be better than omegabetical, but that ain't sayin' much. Zalphabetical is just plain ecch.

#205850 - 05/23/12 08:47 AM Re: Reverse Alphabetical [Re: tomtransmitting]  
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 2
tomtransmitting Offline
stranger
tomtransmitting  Offline
stranger

Joined: May 2012
Posts: 2
KZN
Hoom... yes. The reason I need this word is when specifying how a list of items can presented by a system - for example a list of members of an organisation on a website. I'm trying to avoid saying "You can also view the list in reverse alphabetical order". The same problem comes up when trying to list date-based items like a list of events - that can be list in chronological or reverse chronological order.

Omegapsical is pretty decent.

The only advantage to zalphabetical is that is suggests what it is quite well - dumb people might more easily understand what it means than omegabetical...

Anyhow - thanks for the suggestions.

#205851 - 05/23/12 08:55 AM Re: Reverse Alphabetical [Re: tomtransmitting]  
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,295
BranShea Offline
Carpal Tunnel
BranShea  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,295
Netherlands, the Hague
But., would not everybody understand you just as well if you put it simlpy: "reversed order"?

#205853 - 05/23/12 10:41 AM Re: Reverse Alphabetical [Re: BranShea]  
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Faldage Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Faldage  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
I'm with BranShea, here. You do want your reader to understand what you mean and 'reverse alphabetical order' is perfect for the job. If you tried to drag 'omegapsical order' into it you'll have people looking it up, scratching their heads, and tossing your article into the bit bucket.

#205854 - 05/23/12 04:27 PM Re: Reverse Alphabetical [Re: Faldage]  
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,538
tsuwm Offline
Carpal Tunnel
tsuwm  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,538
this too shall pass
for sure; at least omegabetical can be found via OneLook, thanks to UD!

(Faldo, maybe you should submit your word to UD - they'll accept anything.)

NB: zalphabetical can't be found directly at UD; you have to look up 'zalphabetical order'.

Last edited by tsuwm; 05/23/12 04:31 PM.
#205855 - 05/23/12 04:57 PM Re: Reverse Alphabetical [Re: tomtransmitting]  
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Faldage Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Faldage  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Wordnik discusses omegapsical.

#205856 - 05/23/12 05:42 PM Re: Reverse Alphabetical [Re: Faldage]  
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,538
tsuwm Offline
Carpal Tunnel
tsuwm  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,538
this too shall pass
wordnik is indexed at OneLook, but doesn't seem to have been re-scanned for almost two(2) years - maybe that's why omegapsic(al) (order) doesn't appear there.

this is actually a problem at OneLook, since the founder is supposedly no longer actively involved; they no longer do automatic/periodic updates of all their content, and (at least us lesser) lexic drudges have to *poke* the OneLook drudge(s) to do an update.

Page 1 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  Jackie 

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics13,879
Posts224,003
Members9,024
Most Online3,341
Dec 9th, 2011
Newest Members
TFED1, mark18, PureTech, Dilys, Abishek
9024 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 50 guests, and 2 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days)
Dilys 1
mark18 1
Top Posters(All Time)
wwh 13,858
Faldage 13,803
Jackie 11,613
tsuwm 10,538
LukeJavan8 9,005
AnnaStrophic 6,511
Wordwind 6,296
of troy 5,400
Disclaimer: Wordsmith.org is not responsible for views expressed on this site. Use of this forum is at your own risk and liability - you agree to hold Wordsmith.org and its associates harmless as a condition of using it.

Home | Today's Word | Yesterday's Word | Subscribe | FAQ | Archives | Search | Feedback
Wordsmith Talk | Wordsmith Chat

© 1994-2017 Wordsmith

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.016s Queries: 15 (0.003s) Memory: 2.7253 MB (Peak: 2.8667 MB) Zlib disabled. Server Time: 2017-10-22 04:38:30 UTC