Wordsmith.org: the magic of words

Wordsmith Talk

About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us  

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Reverse Alphabetical #205843
05/22/12 10:09 AM
05/22/12 10:09 AM
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 2
KZN
T
tomtransmitting Offline OP
stranger
tomtransmitting  Offline OP
stranger
T
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 2
KZN
Surely - surely - there is a word that means "in reverse alphabetical order"?

Re: Reverse Alphabetical [Re: tomtransmitting] #205844
05/22/12 11:06 AM
05/22/12 11:06 AM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Faldage Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Faldage  Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
¿Por qué?

Re: Reverse Alphabetical [Re: tomtransmitting] #205845
05/22/12 05:55 PM
05/22/12 05:55 PM
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,538
this too shall pass
tsuwm Offline
Carpal Tunnel
tsuwm  Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,538
this too shall pass
Urban Dictionary suggests 'omegabetical' (heh) and 'zalphabetical' (ecch) - but then who gives any credence to the UD?!

Re: Reverse Alphabetical [Re: tomtransmitting] #205846
05/22/12 10:33 PM
05/22/12 10:33 PM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Faldage Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Faldage  Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Omegapsical might be better than omegabetical, but that ain't sayin' much. Zalphabetical is just plain ecch.

Re: Reverse Alphabetical [Re: tomtransmitting] #205850
05/23/12 08:47 AM
05/23/12 08:47 AM
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 2
KZN
T
tomtransmitting Offline OP
stranger
tomtransmitting  Offline OP
stranger
T
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 2
KZN
Hoom... yes. The reason I need this word is when specifying how a list of items can presented by a system - for example a list of members of an organisation on a website. I'm trying to avoid saying "You can also view the list in reverse alphabetical order". The same problem comes up when trying to list date-based items like a list of events - that can be list in chronological or reverse chronological order.

Omegapsical is pretty decent.

The only advantage to zalphabetical is that is suggests what it is quite well - dumb people might more easily understand what it means than omegabetical...

Anyhow - thanks for the suggestions.

Re: Reverse Alphabetical [Re: tomtransmitting] #205851
05/23/12 08:55 AM
05/23/12 08:55 AM
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,295
Netherlands, the Hague
BranShea Offline
Carpal Tunnel
BranShea  Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,295
Netherlands, the Hague
But., would not everybody understand you just as well if you put it simlpy: "reversed order"?

Re: Reverse Alphabetical [Re: BranShea] #205853
05/23/12 10:41 AM
05/23/12 10:41 AM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Faldage Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Faldage  Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
I'm with BranShea, here. You do want your reader to understand what you mean and 'reverse alphabetical order' is perfect for the job. If you tried to drag 'omegapsical order' into it you'll have people looking it up, scratching their heads, and tossing your article into the bit bucket.

Re: Reverse Alphabetical [Re: Faldage] #205854
05/23/12 04:27 PM
05/23/12 04:27 PM
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,538
this too shall pass
tsuwm Offline
Carpal Tunnel
tsuwm  Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,538
this too shall pass
for sure; at least omegabetical can be found via OneLook, thanks to UD!

(Faldo, maybe you should submit your word to UD - they'll accept anything.)

NB: zalphabetical can't be found directly at UD; you have to look up 'zalphabetical order'.

Last edited by tsuwm; 05/23/12 04:31 PM.
Re: Reverse Alphabetical [Re: tomtransmitting] #205855
05/23/12 04:57 PM
05/23/12 04:57 PM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Faldage Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Faldage  Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Wordnik discusses omegapsical.

Re: Reverse Alphabetical [Re: Faldage] #205856
05/23/12 05:42 PM
05/23/12 05:42 PM
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,538
this too shall pass
tsuwm Offline
Carpal Tunnel
tsuwm  Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,538
this too shall pass
wordnik is indexed at OneLook, but doesn't seem to have been re-scanned for almost two(2) years - maybe that's why omegapsic(al) (order) doesn't appear there.

this is actually a problem at OneLook, since the founder is supposedly no longer actively involved; they no longer do automatic/periodic updates of all their content, and (at least us lesser) lexic drudges have to *poke* the OneLook drudge(s) to do an update.

Page 1 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  Jackie 

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics13,883
Posts224,846
Members9,056
Most Online3,341
Dec 9th, 2011
Newest Members
Nikki1221, Veezkneez, LOC, Luna, wordie
9056 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 185 guests, and 4 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days)
LOC 1
Top Posters(All Time)
wwh 13,858
Faldage 13,803
Jackie 11,613
tsuwm 10,538
LukeJavan8 9,160
AnnaStrophic 6,511
Wordwind 6,296
of troy 5,400
Disclaimer: Wordsmith.org is not responsible for views expressed on this site. Use of this forum is at your own risk and liability - you agree to hold Wordsmith.org and its associates harmless as a condition of using it.

Home | Today's Word | Yesterday's Word | Subscribe | FAQ | Archives | Search | Feedback
Wordsmith Talk | Wordsmith Chat

© 1994-2018 Wordsmith

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.1.1
(Release build 20180111)
Page Time: 0.018s Queries: 15 (0.004s) Memory: 3.1744 MB (Peak: 3.3613 MB) Zlib disabled. Server Time: 2018-06-25 16:05:34 UTC