Wordsmith.org: the magic of words

Wordsmith Talk

About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us  

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
#175370 03/31/08 02:03 PM
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1
H
Hugo Offline OP
stranger
OP Offline
stranger
H
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1
Nice category. These contractions also take place across languages. For example, the somewhat old and now infrequently employed American slang word "hoosegow", used particlarly in western states bordering Mexico, is a slang term for "jail," derived from the Spanish "juzgado."

Hugo #175373 03/31/08 03:37 PM
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3
G
stranger
Offline
stranger
G
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3
I'm pretty sure if you check that "druthers" was a term coined by Walt Kelly in his famed Pogo comic strip. It is used exclusively in the phrase "If I had my druthers" throughout the history of the strip.


Ef Deal
GwynnaL #175374 03/31/08 03:51 PM
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 876
old hand
Offline
old hand
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 876
 Originally Posted By: GwynnaL
I'm pretty sure if you check that "druthers" was a term coined by Walt Kelly in his famed Pogo comic strip. It is used exclusively in the phrase "If I had my druthers" throughout the history of the strip.


Here's what I found: "This is an American phrase and not used widely elsewhere. People elsewhere in the world might want to know what druthers are, as the phrase conveys otherwise. Druthers is a shortening of 'would rathers'. The phrase originated in the late 19th century and is first cited in the January 1870 edition of Overland monthly and Out West magazine, in a story called Centrepole Bill, by George F. Emery:

"If I was a youngster, I 'drather set up in any perfession but a circus-driver, but a man can't always have his 'drathers."

Druthers, as opposed to its earlier variant drathers, is traced back to 1876 in Dialect Notes:

"Bein's I caint have my druthers an' set still, I cal'late I'd better pearten up an' go 'long."

So, not coined by Walt Kelly, according to that source (phrases.org). :0)

twosleepy #175387 03/31/08 10:57 PM
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,067
old hand
Offline
old hand
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,067
There's no doubt it's a distortion of "I'd rather," but is it possible it has more than one source origin? It wouldn't be too hard to imagine that more than one person could independently come up with it.

The Pook #175389 03/31/08 11:08 PM
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,542
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,542
it'd rather be easier to believe that Al Capp and/or Walt Kelly "borrowed" it from earlier sources!

-ron occam

tsuwm #175400 04/01/08 06:44 AM
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,154
Z
Zed Offline
Pooh-Bah
Offline
Pooh-Bah
Z
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,154
Howdy Strangers, haul up an set a spell.
(to go overboard on the western theme ;\) )
edited cos my smily wouldn't

Last edited by Zed; 04/01/08 06:45 AM.
tsuwm #175411 04/01/08 02:36 PM
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
it'd rather be easier to believe that Al Capp and/or Walt Kelly "borrowed" it from earlier sources!

-ron occam

Now, now--don't go bein' raw knock'em...

Jackie #175427 04/01/08 09:38 PM
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 557
M
addict
Offline
addict
M
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 557
...so no one is going to comment on the original post which calls making one Spanish word into one English word a contraction? Oh, wait, I think I just did...

Myridon #175428 04/01/08 11:14 PM
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,067
old hand
Offline
old hand
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,067
 Originally Posted By: Myridon
...so no one is going to comment on the original post which calls making one Spanish word into one English word a contraction? Oh, wait, I think I just did...

It's simultaneously a contraction and a borrowing. Hoosegow, whilst it has more letters than juzgado, has one fewer syllables and is phonemically a contraction of sorts.

Myridon #175429 04/02/08 12:29 AM
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 876
old hand
Offline
old hand
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 876
 Originally Posted By: Myridon
...so no one is going to comment on the original post which calls making one Spanish word into one English word a contraction? Oh, wait, I think I just did...


Actually, Myridon, I read it as his calling "druthers" a contraction (which it is) and pointing out that this also occurs in other languages, such as Spanish, which it does. The word "juzgado" (literally "judged" = "court"; "jail" is "carcel") is pronounced "hoos-gah-tho". It is very common in all places Spanish is spoken for the "th" sound (letter D) to be dropped, forming a diphthong "ao" or "ow". "Hoosegow" is exactly the phonemic equivalent of "juzga'o", with the exception of the placement of stress on the first syllable rather than on the second (or diphthong).

 Originally Posted By: Pook
It's simultaneously a contraction and a borrowing. Hoosegow, whilst it has more letters than juzgado, has one fewer syllables and is phonemically a contraction of sorts.


I'm not sure, Pook, that this is truly borrowing. The word doesn't mean the same thing in both languages. I think of borrowing as words such as tortilla, tacos, burritos etc. that "generally" (this is commentary on Mexican cuisine made in America - bleh!) refer to the same foods (as an example) in both languages. :0)

Myridon #175431 04/02/08 01:50 AM
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
You're right, Myr. Thank you.
"hoosegow", used particlarly in western states bordering Mexico, is a slang term for "jail," derived from the Spanish "juzgado."
Thanks, Hugo, and welcome to you.

twosleepy #175435 04/02/08 05:23 AM
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,067
old hand
Offline
old hand
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,067
That would be a hard 'th' (dh) wouldn't it? As in 'the' not as in 'thing.'

It is borrowing, whether or not it means the same thing. And in this case it does mean pretty much the same thing anyway.

English borrows any word from any language that it thinks it can use in any way it sees fit. That's the genius of the language! We English speakers never let meaning get in the way of stealing a nice word. And even when it does mean exactly the same thing at the time it is borrowed, give it a generation or two and it will go the same way as other English words - its meaning will drift and/or expand with usage. Other Spanish loan words that have come to be used in ways other than their original meaning or context would include gusto, taco, gringo, and probably most other words ending in 'o'

The Pook #175442 04/02/08 11:51 AM
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 876
old hand
Offline
old hand
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 876
Yes, Pook, the hard one, LOL! I'm too lazy even to look up the correct name, although I knew it once for a class in grad school...

Many other cultures liberally borrow from other languages, much of it from English as it is so widespread and many technology terms originated with English speakers. But lets be less sexist and say most other words ending in "a" also... he he he :0)

twosleepy #175443 04/02/08 12:16 PM
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,290
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,290
to look up the correct name

There are two kinds of alveolar fricatives in English: voiceless /þ/ as in thin and voiced /ð/ as in that. The name of the first character is thorn and that of the second one is edh. Voicing is a rather common distinctive feature in many languages. The stops /p/, /t/, and /k/ are voiceless, and /b/, /d/, and /g/ are their voiced counterparts. Usual the term hard is used to distinguish fricatives or affricates from stops: e.g., the g in gel from that in goat.

Many languages borrow words with no intention of paying back the loan. It's one of the ways that languages get new vocabulary.


Ceci n'est pas un seing.
zmjezhd #175446 04/02/08 02:24 PM
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 876
old hand
Offline
old hand
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 876
Yup, that looks familiar, zmjezhd! I say "familiar" because the course I took was taught in Spanish, so the nomenclature was such as "alveolar fricativo", "sordo", "sonoro" etc. It's been many moons since then, so I'd have to look it up, and I have too much to do these days! Thanks for the memories... ;0)

twosleepy #175448 04/02/08 04:42 PM
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3
stranger
Offline
stranger
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3
English-speaking South Africans frequently greet each other with "Howzit?"
Certain white New Orleanians (mainly from Lower 9th Ward) are referred to as Yats, after the greeting "Where y'at?"

pedantman #175449 04/02/08 05:00 PM
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,295
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,295
 Quote:
English-speaking South Africans frequently greet each other with "Howzit?"

Hi, pedantman?

"Howzit" looks like the English form of the Dutch (- Afrikaans) greeting : " Hoe is et?"

BranShea #175450 04/02/08 05:09 PM
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3
stranger
Offline
stranger
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3
Wouldn't be surprised by the "Hoe is et?" derivation.
My South-African wife is not currently at home to verify, and you don't want to get her started talking about Afrikaans, sometimes described as "not a language, but a throat disease" (in stark contrast to the beautiful Dutch pronunciations):)

pedantman #175453 04/02/08 07:25 PM
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,295
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,295
Yes, Dutch would sound perfectly allright if only it would sound more like Brazilian Portuguese. \:\)

pedantman #175462 04/03/08 01:02 AM
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,067
old hand
Offline
old hand
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,067
 Originally Posted By: pedantman
English-speaking South Africans frequently greet each other with "Howzit?"
Certain white New Orleanians (mainly from Lower 9th Ward) are referred to as Yats, after the greeting "Where y'at?"


In cricket, a shout of "'owzat?" (how's that?) is an appeal to the umpire to give the batsman out. In Australian idiom, a greeting often heard is "'owzit garn?" (how's it going?) or even "airzit garn."

The Pook #175482 04/03/08 11:41 AM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
 Originally Posted By: The Pook
In Australian idiom, a greeting often heard is "'owzit garn?" (how's it going?) or even "airzit garn."


Those Rs aren't really pronounced, are they.

Faldage #175486 04/03/08 01:07 PM
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,067
old hand
Offline
old hand
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,067
 Originally Posted By: Faldage
 Originally Posted By: The Pook
In Australian idiom, a greeting often heard is "'owzit garn?" (how's it going?) or even "airzit garn."


Those Rs aren't really pronounced, are they.


Yes, they aren't pronounced. It's a non-rhotic dialect.

The Pook #175492 04/03/08 04:02 PM
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 557
M
addict
Offline
addict
M
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 557
If they aren't pronounced, why did you put them there? Why not "aizit gan" if that's how it's pronounced? And, why "airzit garn" and not "rarirarirt rgrarn"? (^_^)

Sincererly,
Laura Norder

Myridon #175518 04/04/08 12:28 AM
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,290
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,290
If they aren't pronounced, why did you put them there?

Because non-rhotic varieties of English use them to distinguish /æ/ from /ɑ/ (i.e., a from ar). Cf. the strange, to USan eyes, reference in the first chapter of Winnie the Pooh contrasting ther Pooh with the Pooh (i.e., /ðə/ and /ðiː/). (It's one of the reasons to use IPA rather than ad hoc pseudo-phonemic spellings.)


Ceci n'est pas un seing.
Myridon #175522 04/04/08 03:48 AM
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,067
old hand
Offline
old hand
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,067
yes, what he said. Although in Winnie the Pooh, the non-rhotic 'r' was not to distinguish 'ther' from 'the' but to emphasise the definite article. The contrast is between Pooh without the article and 'THE Pooh.' In some mystical, never explained way, somehow Winnie THE Pooh is a boy's name, even though Winnie is a girl's name.

Besides, 'aizit' would be pronounced like eye-zit, not the same sound at all. The diphthong 'ai' by itself normally communicates the sound found in 'aisle' and is not the same sound as the ai in air, hair, chair, fair, etc (i.e. æ), whether or not you pronounce the 'r.'

"And, why "airzit garn" and not "rarirarirt rgrarn"?" Because that's not where you put intrusive/non-rhotic 'r's - see the thread called 'pigeon towed' pigeon towed for previous discussion about non-rhotic spelling and pronunciation.

Last edited by The Pook; 04/04/08 03:49 AM.
The Pook #175529 04/04/08 10:52 AM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
 Originally Posted By: The Pook
yes, what he said. Although in Winnie the Pooh, the non-rhotic 'r' was not to distinguish 'ther' from 'the' but to emphasise the definite article. The contrast is between Pooh without the article and 'THE Pooh.' In some mystical, never explained way, somehow Winnie THE Pooh is a boy's name, even though Winnie is a girl's name.

Besides, 'aizit' would be pronounced like eye-zit, not the same sound at all. The diphthong 'ai' by itself normally communicates the sound found in 'aisle' and is not the same sound as the ai in air, hair, chair, fair, etc (i.e. æ), whether or not you pronounce the 'r.'

"And, why "airzit garn" and not "rarirarirt rgrarn"?" Because that's not where you put intrusive/non-rhotic 'r's - see the thread called 'pigeon towed' pigeon towed for previous discussion about non-rhotic spelling and pronunciation.


What Nuncle said.

Faldage #175534 04/04/08 01:31 PM
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,290
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,290
The Wikipedia article on Australian English phonology (link) may be apropos.


Ceci n'est pas un seing.
zmjezhd #175535 04/04/08 03:05 PM
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 557
M
addict
Offline
addict
M
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 557
How would you spell it phonetically without using an r then? I'm thinking that you really do say an r (or at least an r-colored vowel) for some reason you'd like to deny that.
Your argument is that aizit would be eye-zit, but why airzit instead of ay-zit or A-zit if there's not a hint of arrrrrrrr sneaking in there?

Myridon #175539 04/04/08 03:18 PM
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,290
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,290
How would you spell it phonetically without using an r then?

I would have to hear the speaker say the two phrases, before attempting to transcribe them accurately. I was just saying that some non-rhotic varieties of English use an r in phonic spellings to indicate difference in vocalic quality, and not that there is anythingr-colored about the vowel. On the other hand, some non-rhotic varieties of English exhibit a phenomenon called intrusive-r, where an r intrudes in a word, where it is not phonologically or etymologically motivated: e.g., pronouncing barn /bɑːn/, but idea /ʔəjdiːɹ/ in some varieties of NE US English.


Ceci n'est pas un seing.
zmjezhd #175540 04/04/08 03:23 PM
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
idea /ʔəjdiːɹ/ And 'round these parts, I occasionally hear an l added on to the end of idea, as in, "I don't think much of that ideal". \:\(

Jackie #175542 04/04/08 03:35 PM
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,290
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,290
"I don't think much of that ideal"

But is that just faulty lexical selection or a phonological feature of the local variety of English?


Ceci n'est pas un seing.
zmjezhd #175555 04/04/08 09:07 PM
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
They mean the word idea; they just add the l onto it. Locals.
"You have no ideal what I've been through..." I'm glad it's not real prevalent.

zmjezhd #175567 04/05/08 07:32 AM
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,067
old hand
Offline
old hand
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,067
 Originally Posted By: zmjezhd
How would you spell it phonetically without using an r then?

I would have to hear the speaker say the two phrases, before attempting to transcribe them accurately. I was just saying that some non-rhotic varieties of English use an r in phonic spellings to indicate difference in vocalic quality, and not that there is anythingr-colored about the vowel. On the other hand, some non-rhotic varieties of English exhibit a phenomenon called intrusive-r, where an r intrudes in a word, where it is not phonologically or etymologically motivated: e.g., pronouncing barn /bɑːn/, but idea /ʔəjdiːɹ/ in some varieties of NE US English.


Thanks for saying what I couldn't be bothered to retrieve from the other thread and quote again. I believe someone (probably you) mentioned Rudyard Kipling's transliterations of some Hindi or Urdu words having non-rhotic spellings that mislead rhotic speakers. In these kinds of words 'ar' for example indicates a long 'a' sound not a voiced 'r' and would be spelt 'ah' or similar had he been an American.

I just realised actually that the 'i' in my 'howzit garn' or 'airzit garn' is actually more properly a schwa. But there is definitely no 'r' sound.

zmjezhd #175568 04/05/08 07:37 AM
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,067
old hand
Offline
old hand
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,067
 Originally Posted By: zmjezhd
The Wikipedia article on Australian English phonology (link) may be apropos.


Nice link, thanks.

The Pook #175575 04/05/08 01:10 PM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
A good example of a non-rhotic R being stuck in the standard transliteration of a foreign word is the Korean family name normally spelled Park in English. The hangul is 팍, which I would transliterate as Pahk. It is customarirly pronounced by rhotic Americans as it is spelled, Park.

Faldage #175578 04/05/08 01:15 PM
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,067
old hand
Offline
old hand
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,067
 Originally Posted By: Faldage
A good example of a non-rhotic R being stuck in the standard transliteration of a foreign word is the Korean family name normally spelled Park in English. The hangul is 팍, which I would transliterate as Pahk. It is customarirly pronounced by rhotic Americans as it is spelled, Park.


Yes I remember you mentioning that somewhere else. It had never occurred to me this was a problem since being a non-rhotician (non-rhote?) I had never thought of pronouncing it as anything but Pahk.

The Pook #175582 04/05/08 04:20 PM
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 876
old hand
Offline
old hand
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 876
Well, at least they'll get it right in Boston... ;0)

twosleepy #175595 04/05/08 09:22 PM
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
at least they'll get it right in Boston :-) As in, pahk the cah in Bahston?

Jackie #175601 04/05/08 10:13 PM
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 876
old hand
Offline
old hand
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 876
You gaht it! I was gonna write "Bahstan", but it looked too much like a city in the Middle East, or something... :0)

twosleepy #175606 04/06/08 09:36 AM
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,067
old hand
Offline
old hand
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,067
 Originally Posted By: twosleepy
You gaht it! I was gonna write "Bahstan", but it looked too much like a city in the Middle East, or something... :0)


Or should that be 'gahd it'? Nice to know somewhere in the US they speak proper English!

The Pook #175613 04/06/08 12:25 PM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
And the first O in Boston isn't pronounced the same as the AR in Park and Car.

Faldage #175617 04/06/08 02:39 PM
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,290
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,290
the first O in Boston isn't pronounced the same as the AR in Park and Car

Wikipedia has an article on the Boston accent (link). Also, there are two or more accents. I am thinking of the Boston Brahmin sociolectal accent (link, especially the audio links at the end of the article).


Ceci n'est pas un seing.
zmjezhd #175631 04/06/08 09:25 PM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
There's about five or six Boston accents, maybe more if you consider some of the outlying area.

zmjezhd #175638 04/06/08 11:29 PM
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,067
old hand
Offline
old hand
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,067
 Originally Posted By: zmjezhd
the first O in Boston isn't pronounced the same as the AR in Park and Car

Wikipedia has an article on the Boston accent (link). Also, there are two or more accents. I am thinking of the Boston Brahmin sociolectal accent (link, especially the audio links at the end of the article).


I'm beginning to think you actually WROTE these articles! Is there anything you don't know? \:o

The Pook #175640 04/07/08 12:00 AM
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,290
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,290
to think you actually WROTE these articles

No, but the author(s) and I have been reading the same sorts of articles and books.


Ceci n'est pas un seing.
Faldage #175641 04/07/08 12:01 AM
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,290
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,290
's about five or six Boston accents

Language, like life, is always a bit more complicated that folks think it is.


Ceci n'est pas un seing.
Faldage #175647 04/07/08 02:36 AM
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
the first O in Boston isn't pronounced the same as the AR in Park and Car. I thought prolly not, but I'm not familiar enough with it to know how to make the distinction, written or orally.

Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 4 5

Moderated by  Jackie 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics13,913
Posts229,328
Members9,182
Most Online3,341
Dec 9th, 2011
Newest Members
Ineffable, ddrinnan, TRIALNERRA, befuddledmind, KILL_YOUR_SUV
9,182 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 691 guests, and 0 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days)
Top Posters
wwh 13,858
Faldage 13,803
Jackie 11,613
tsuwm 10,542
wofahulicodoc 10,539
LukeJavan8 9,916
AnnaStrophic 6,511
Wordwind 6,296
of troy 5,400
Disclaimer: Wordsmith.org is not responsible for views expressed on this site. Use of this forum is at your own risk and liability - you agree to hold Wordsmith.org and its associates harmless as a condition of using it.

Home | Today's Word | Yesterday's Word | Subscribe | FAQ | Archives | Search | Feedback
Wordsmith Talk | Wordsmith Chat

© 1994-2024 Wordsmith

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5