Wordsmith.org: the magic of words

Wordsmith Talk

About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us  

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 29
P
newbie
OP Offline
newbie
P
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 29
Thanks for the clarification, everyone.

I just feel better that I'm not the only one that didn't get the reference.

I can admit to slight feelings of superiority when I hear someone use the word 'irregardless.'

I feel a tad guilty about that.

Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,290
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,290
irregardless

My superior intuition about the prefix in irregardless is that it is the same intensifier as the in- in inflammable. The prefix in- (also il-, im-, or ir-) in Latin was not only used for negation, it was an intensifier, also. There was also another, third, meaning of 'in, into, on' as in invade or invent (literally 'come upon', 'find', etc.


Ceci n'est pas un seing.
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,542
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,542
Originally Posted By: zmjezhd
irregardless

My superior intuition about the prefix in irregardless is that it is the same intensifier as the in- in inflammable.


and my innate cynicism informs me that irregardless really was (originally) just a fortuitous* blend of regardless and irrespective -- in the latter of which the prefix -ir is not an intensifier, but a negation.

*and I don't mean lucky!!

-joe (each of us succumbs to peevology on occasion) friday

Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,154
Z
Zed Offline
Pooh-Bah
Offline
Pooh-Bah
Z
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,154
Originally Posted By: zmjezhd
irregardless

The prefix in- (also il-, im-, or ir-) in Latin was not only used for negation, it was an intensifier, also.

Boy, I'll bet that could lead to some misunderstandings and nights on the couch. "How do I look?"
"Inelegant. Ouch! No,no, I meant that as an intensifier..."

Porcupine #173094 02/02/08 02:50 PM
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 29
P
newbie
OP Offline
newbie
P
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 29
"irregardless
an erroneous word that, etymologically, means the exact opposite of what it is used to express, attested in non-standard writing from 1912, probably a blend of irrespective and regardless. Perhaps inspired by the double negative used as an emphatic."

Online Etymology Dictionary, © 2001 Douglas Harper

Porcupine #173098 02/02/08 04:08 PM
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,773
D
Pooh-Bah
Offline
Pooh-Bah
D
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,773
regardless is to irregardless
as irregardless is to irregardlessly
as preventive is to preventative
as important is to importantly

Join me all in my quest to curtail unnecessary keystrokes

Last edited by dalehileman; 02/02/08 05:47 PM.

dalehileman
Porcupine #173102 02/02/08 04:37 PM
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,529
T
veteran
Offline
veteran
T
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,529
Originally Posted By: Porcupine
"irregardless
an erroneous word that, etymologically, means the exact opposite of what it is used to express, attested in non-standard writing from 1912, probably a blend of irrespective and regardless. Perhaps inspired by the double negative used as an emphatic."

Online Etymology Dictionary, © 2001 Douglas Harper


Not so, Douglas Harper, you are being silly. No word can mean the exact opposite of what it is intended to express. Words transfer information between a minimum of two human beings and any validation is only subject to the sucessful transfer of the intended meaning.

But irregardlessly, most double negatives are perceived by the ear as intensifiers or emphatics, especially here in the South where when you say "I don't want no mo grits" it means that you really doesn't want any more grits at the moment.

Porcupine #173104 02/02/08 04:43 PM
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,290
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,290
Douglas Harper

Sorry, but it's my etymology, and it differs from Mr Harper's.


Ceci n'est pas un seing.
themilum #173107 02/02/08 08:42 PM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Originally Posted By: themilum
No word can mean the exact opposite of what it is intended to express.


Yeah, right.

Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,154
Z
Zed Offline
Pooh-Bah
Offline
Pooh-Bah
Z
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,154
Originally Posted By: dalehileman
regardless is to irregardless
as irregardless is to irregardlessly
as preventive is to preventative
as important is to importantly

Join me all in my quest to curtail unnecessary keystrokes


a preventative - a preventive measure noun vs adjective
importantly - with an important air adverb vs adjective

It doesn't sound like a matter of keystrokes to me.

Page 2 of 3 1 2 3

Moderated by  Jackie 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics13,912
Posts229,283
Members9,179
Most Online3,341
Dec 9th, 2011
Newest Members
TRIALNERRA, befuddledmind, KILL_YOUR_SUV, Heather_Turey, Standy
9,179 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 442 guests, and 3 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days)
Top Posters
wwh 13,858
Faldage 13,803
Jackie 11,613
tsuwm 10,542
wofahulicodoc 10,510
LukeJavan8 9,916
AnnaStrophic 6,511
Wordwind 6,296
of troy 5,400
Disclaimer: Wordsmith.org is not responsible for views expressed on this site. Use of this forum is at your own risk and liability - you agree to hold Wordsmith.org and its associates harmless as a condition of using it.

Home | Today's Word | Yesterday's Word | Subscribe | FAQ | Archives | Search | Feedback
Wordsmith Talk | Wordsmith Chat

© 1994-2024 Wordsmith

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5