Wordsmith.org: the magic of words

Wordsmith Talk

About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us  

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
#168559 06/07/07 05:55 AM
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 18
B
stranger
OP Offline
stranger
B
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 18
Language is often misunderstood to be a mere subject in thought; Language is that which encompasses all subjects, the power that is thought itself.

I seek approbation, disapprobation.

Last edited by Bohemian_Cur; 06/07/07 07:00 AM.
Bohemian_Cur #168567 06/07/07 03:05 PM
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
Welcome, BC (sorry--let me know if the shortening bothers you).
Um--does a mere subject in thought have anything to do with Logwood's mentalese?

Jackie #168579 06/08/07 12:55 AM
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 18
B
stranger
OP Offline
stranger
B
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 18
Please, call me Kemp. No. What I meant to express is, as some rightfully consider English01 to be a subject in, say, a school, some wrongfully consider Language to be a subject in thought, as science or poetry is. Language, I defend, is not a subject, but the facility that gives thought—that which encompasses all subjects.

Bohemian_Cur #168581 06/08/07 01:57 AM
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 13
stranger
Offline
stranger
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 13
You remind me of Benjamin Lee Whorf, whom I still consider a great linguist. He believed language determined thought, as well as thought effecting language. If you get a chance to read "Language, Thought, and Reality," I'm sure you'll enjoy it.

Nanu Nanu #168584 06/08/07 03:36 AM
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 18
B
stranger
OP Offline
stranger
B
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 18
If that is a compliment, I thank you. Former teachers tell me that I am a purist, a pedant, one who deals with language too seriously. I disagree: language cannot be dealt with too seriously; the more diligently one deals with language, the more defined they will become. I will find the book and peruse it.

Bohemian_Cur #168586 06/08/07 09:31 AM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Words fail me.

Faldage #168590 06/08/07 12:18 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,400
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,400
a purist? Oh, Dear! you might not be happy here.

this is like a sausage factory! we take language seriously, but we aren't purist.

there are some who shudder at nouns becoming verbs, and verbs becoming nouns.. and others who demonstrate that the particular noun or verb was first misused 200 or 300 years ago (and while it might be abdominable.. it's not new.)

Do we need words to think? i say no. but words and language allow us to share thoughts. newborn infants are able to express displeasure. but how much easier life is when, beignning age 2 or so, they can tell you what is wrong!

welcome Kemp and Nanu*2

Bohemian_Cur #168620 06/10/07 07:13 PM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Originally Posted By: Bohemian_Cur
Language is often misunderstood to be a mere subject in thought; Language is that which encompasses all subjects, the power that is thought itself.

I seek approbation, disapprobation.


Certainly an interesting proposition. Here's a comment on this subject from Language Log. Warning a somewhat longish download, particularly for those of us poor souls with dialup, but well worth the wait.

Faldage #168627 06/11/07 12:54 PM
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 270
enthusiast
Offline
enthusiast
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 270
Speaking of Benjamin Lee Whorf, I mentioned the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis on my last thread. I say, while there may be some truth in it, people do have a way of oversimplifying life, or the human mind...

Logwood #168633 06/11/07 07:44 PM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 120
member
Offline
member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 120
Do you think that all languages embody full communication? Or that all languages combined convery mastery of all concepts?

The problem is that not all concepts translate well from a specific language to another specific language. The words, the grammar, the structure, etc are tools used to convery concepts, but some which are not identified by word (either spoken or written). Within a given language group (ie, English) there are so many variations (color vrs colour, as a simple example) that to identify any single language as all encompassing. I can visualize things which I can not adequately describe to share...Language fails on many levels, no matter the mastery.


tempus edax rerum
Page 1 of 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Moderated by  Jackie 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics13,913
Posts229,316
Members9,182
Most Online3,341
Dec 9th, 2011
Newest Members
Ineffable, ddrinnan, TRIALNERRA, befuddledmind, KILL_YOUR_SUV
9,182 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 441 guests, and 0 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days)
Top Posters
wwh 13,858
Faldage 13,803
Jackie 11,613
tsuwm 10,542
wofahulicodoc 10,533
LukeJavan8 9,916
AnnaStrophic 6,511
Wordwind 6,296
of troy 5,400
Disclaimer: Wordsmith.org is not responsible for views expressed on this site. Use of this forum is at your own risk and liability - you agree to hold Wordsmith.org and its associates harmless as a condition of using it.

Home | Today's Word | Yesterday's Word | Subscribe | FAQ | Archives | Search | Feedback
Wordsmith Talk | Wordsmith Chat

© 1994-2024 Wordsmith

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5