Wordsmith.org: the magic of words

Wordsmith Talk

About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us  

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
#148348 - 09/27/05 12:07 PM Re: 'manned/unmanned' and gender neutralisation  
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,379
inselpeter Offline
Pooh-Bah
inselpeter  Offline
Pooh-Bah

Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,379
New York City
Bryan Garner gives eight solutions in Chapter 7 of "The Elements of Legal Style."


#148349 - 09/27/05 06:10 PM Re: 'manned/unmanned' and gender neutralisation  
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 2,891
belMarduk Offline
Carpal Tunnel
belMarduk  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 2,891
I’m not thrilled about “staffed/unstaffed” because that implies that there should be more than one person sitting there and all of them were out. Staff represents a group of people.

I’d see staff being used in the case where somebody walked in to an office with several desks, and there was nobody around. Then saying the place was unstaffed would work.

Perhaps not politically correct, but I do not feel diminished in any way by the words manned or unmanned. It’s one of those words that, to me, does not specifically imply that the person was male, like the word mailman does.



#148350 - 09/27/05 07:52 PM Re: 'manned/unmanned' and gender neutralisation  
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,538
tsuwm Offline
Carpal Tunnel
tsuwm  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,538
this too shall pass
>It’s one of those words that, to me, does not specifically imply that the person was male, like the word mailman does.

boy(!), howdy -- that's an awfully narrow and sharp (not to say cheesy) distinction.


#148351 - 09/28/05 02:04 AM Re: 'manned/unmanned' and gender neutralisation  
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,065
Bingley Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Bingley  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,065
Jakarta
In reply to:

Juliet

Come, civil night,
Thou sober-suited matron, all in black,
And learn me how to lose a winning match,
Played for a pair of stainless maidenhoods.
Hood my unmanned blood, bating in my cheeks,
With thy black mantle till strange love grow bold,
Think true love acted simple modesty.
Come, night; come, Romeo; come, thou day in night;
For thou wilt lie upon the wings of night
Whiter than new snow upon a raven's back.

Unmanned here means untamed. Nice usage of the verb to learn, too.


I always assumed it referred to the fact that she was still a virgin, and all that messy stuff with bloodied sheets and such.


Bingley



Bingley
#148352 - 09/28/05 10:26 AM Re: 'manned/unmanned' and gender neutralisation  
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,055
belligerentyouth Offline
old hand
belligerentyouth  Offline
old hand

Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,055
Berlin
>It’s one of those words that, to me, does not specifically imply that the person was male, like the word mailman does.

>>boy(!), howdy -- that's an awfully narrow and sharp (not to say cheesy) distinction.

Well, I kind of understand the reasoning - this is where you come down to the crux of the matter. I mean, I personally don't think too much of gender neutral language if it ends up as clunky 'he/she' formations and no matter what people say about the plural pronouns being fine it does *not sound better than just using the singular male to me.
At least in this case too, there doesn't seem to be an obvious way around the problem. In other cases, I've heard of mixing pronouns, but it isn't very popular; certainly not in technical texts! I also read a book which used male phrasing throughout but commented in the introduction that this was in no way meant to discriminate against the other sex, but rather was chosen simply becuase it was simple. That approach worked in that case, I think. Be that as it may, anyone involved in writing publicised English texts has to grapple with genders whether they like it or not. I do wonder how things are managed in other languages. English certainly seems to be an exception in its thoroughness as far as I can tell, and a little hyper-PC compared to other languages, is it not?


#148353 - 09/28/05 11:59 AM Re: 'manned/unmanned' and gender neutralisation  
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,379
inselpeter Offline
Pooh-Bah
inselpeter  Offline
Pooh-Bah

Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,379
New York City
>>personally, I don't think too much of gender-neutral language<<

But many readers do. If the object is to communicate, it is wise not to alienate them. This is not to endorse an over-indulgence in pcese, but considerations of gender do not obscure and, in fact, have merit.

#148354 - 09/28/05 12:42 PM Re: 'manned/unmanned' and gender neutralisation  
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 7,210
Buffalo Shrdlu Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Buffalo Shrdlu  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 7,210
Vermont
a lot of mainline Protestant churches re-wrote their hymnals and other service books in the last couple of decades to eliminate gender-specific language. I'm all for it. we do it for future generations.



formerly known as etaoin...
#148355 - 09/28/05 01:08 PM Re: 'manned/unmanned' and gender neutralisation  
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,290
zmjezhd Offline
Carpal Tunnel
zmjezhd  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,290
R'lyeh
all that messy stuff with bloodied sheets

The monologue perhaps, but I was typing about the use of the word unmanned. (The Latin virgo 'maiden, virgin' is related to vir 'man' and English were as in werewolf or weregeld.) Unmanned for deflowered is kind of a stretch, though.



Ceci n'est pas un seing.
#148356 - 09/28/05 02:08 PM Re: 'manned/unmanned' and gender neutralisation  
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,065
Bingley Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Bingley  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,065
Jakarta
whoops, came out as a double post.

Bingley


Bingley
#148357 - 09/28/05 02:08 PM Re: 'manned/unmanned' and gender neutralisation  
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,065
Bingley Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Bingley  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,065
Jakarta
No, no, you misunderstand me. I was thinking of unmanned here equalling undeflowered.

Bingley


Bingley
Page 2 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6

Moderated by  Jackie 

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics13,877
Posts223,578
Members9,003
Most Online3,341
Dec 9th, 2011
Newest Members
bpatterson0032, Aladitya_khan, JdawgGaming, Hiteshi, JaneJane
9003 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 42 guests, and 5 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days)
Top Posters(All Time)
wwh 13,858
Faldage 13,803
Jackie 11,613
tsuwm 10,538
LukeJavan8 8,875
AnnaStrophic 6,511
Wordwind 6,296
of troy 5,400
Disclaimer: Wordsmith.org is not responsible for views expressed on this site. Use of this forum is at your own risk and liability - you agree to hold Wordsmith.org and its associates harmless as a condition of using it.

Home | Today's Word | Yesterday's Word | Subscribe | FAQ | Archives | Search | Feedback
Wordsmith Talk | Wordsmith Chat

© 1994-2017 Wordsmith

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.015s Queries: 13 (0.003s) Memory: 2.7325 MB (Peak: 2.8646 MB) Zlib disabled. Server Time: 2017-05-26 07:27:14 UTC