Wordsmith.org: the magic of words

Wordsmith Talk

About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us  

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
#126675 04/02/04 12:46 PM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,526
veteran
Offline
veteran
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,526

Intent determines altruism in humans. If the sole purpose that a person did a particular thing was so he could say "See, I did *this*," then the thing is not altruistic. If the person did it for selfless reasons and then bragged about it as an afterthought, the deed is no less altruistic, imo.

I - and perhaps others - write as if altruism and selfishness were binary choices. But there are gradations between these extremes and a single bit is insufficient to convey the myriad possibilities.

I qualify the above with the phrase "in humans," because it's not clear to me that bees, for example, have intent, though their behavior is commonly recognized as altruistic.

k



#126676 04/02/04 04:01 PM
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,624
Pooh-Bah
Offline
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,624
could you please define horsepucky for me?. You can be frank about it, I am no sociobiologist, and I also have some sneaky suspicions about them. I gather the "selfish gene" is already outdated.

Sure, Werner. It's a polite way of saying bullshit!

I was being controversial. My dislike of sociobiology stems from an abhorrence of "science" that in many cases proves its theories by begging the question and other forms of dodgy logic. My dislike of sociobiology is also known to many on the board!

I've always felt that the major attraction of sociobiology to otherwise quite smart people like Dawkins is because adopting allows you to avoid rigour ...


#126677 04/02/04 08:34 PM
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 2,891
B
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
B
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 2,891
>>>My dislike of sociobiology is also known to many on the board!

Really Cap? How could we possibly know that, what with you being all timid-like, and introverted, and reticent to voice yer opinion an all.



#126678 04/02/04 10:40 PM
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
Jackie Offline OP
Carpal Tunnel
OP Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
Yes, he always has been a shrinking violet...


#126679 04/04/04 02:02 PM
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,439
W
wow Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
W
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,439
"Regard for others as a principle of action; unselfishness" is the way OED defines it.
Wonder how long they discussed before coming up with that definition?


#126680 04/04/04 07:43 PM
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 34
T
newbie
Offline
newbie
T
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 34
the "selfish gene" is already outdated

The "selfish gene" isn't outdated, wsieber. It's just got a new spin doctor.



#126681 04/04/04 07:54 PM
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 34
T
newbie
Offline
newbie
T
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 34
Trumpeting a good deed ... That's clearly opportunism

Right on, maahey.

If I want to do good
And I try to do good
That's "altruism".

If I happen to do good
And I make it look good
That's "opportunism".


#126682 04/04/04 08:07 PM
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 13,858
W
wwh Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
W
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 13,858
When a mother bird feeds the cookoo's young, is that
altruism? I think it could be argued both ways.


#126683 04/04/04 09:33 PM
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 2,891
B
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
B
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 2,891
I don't think so Bill, from the several articles I've read about it, the mother bird thinks that the cuckoo is actually one of her babies hatching from one of her own eggs. So she's not doing this out of niceness to the mother cuckoo.

I'm thinking that when the mother bird plays decoy to distract a predetor from her nest - that sounds more like altruism.


#126684 04/04/04 10:41 PM
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 771
old hand
Offline
old hand
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 771
Actually, I've read a theory that it's the most selfish act of 'em all ~ the mother bird is attempting to distract the predator from her young so that her own genetic legacy will survive. The book to which I refer put it in a larger context, of course...

Dark Nature: A Natural History of Evil by Lyall Watson, in case anyone's interested. It was a good read.


Page 2 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Moderated by  Jackie 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics13,913
Posts229,318
Members9,182
Most Online3,341
Dec 9th, 2011
Newest Members
Ineffable, ddrinnan, TRIALNERRA, befuddledmind, KILL_YOUR_SUV
9,182 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 437 guests, and 1 robot.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days)
Top Posters
wwh 13,858
Faldage 13,803
Jackie 11,613
tsuwm 10,542
wofahulicodoc 10,535
LukeJavan8 9,916
AnnaStrophic 6,511
Wordwind 6,296
of troy 5,400
Disclaimer: Wordsmith.org is not responsible for views expressed on this site. Use of this forum is at your own risk and liability - you agree to hold Wordsmith.org and its associates harmless as a condition of using it.

Home | Today's Word | Yesterday's Word | Subscribe | FAQ | Archives | Search | Feedback
Wordsmith Talk | Wordsmith Chat

© 1994-2024 Wordsmith

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5