Wordsmith.org: the magic of words

Wordsmith Talk

About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us  

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
#126225 03/26/04 10:55 PM
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 164
member
OP Offline
member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 164
I have been working with a poetry class and have found myself trying to figure out if the usage of "I AM" within a sentence is correct when one is denoting ones self with in a sentence. Such as, “I am trying to understand the connotations of this particular usage of the English language.”

If I were to check my computers grammar checker it says that it is wrong, yet if I speak with different people they inform me that it is correct.

So here is my question, is it a correct usage of the English language to say “I am”?

Rev. Alimae


Rev. Alimae
#126226 03/26/04 11:14 PM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Whatever might your grammar checker say it should be?


#126227 03/26/04 11:17 PM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,661
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,661
I'm quite sure it might be.


#126228 03/26/04 11:22 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,475
J
veteran
Offline
veteran
J
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,475
Hard to say. What's the sentence? And what's the suggested correction? The verb to be has a lot of functions in English some of which are grammatical.


#126229 03/26/04 11:26 PM
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 2,891
B
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
B
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 2,891
I don't see what is wrong with that sentence at all Alimae. It's a shame your grammar-checker doesn't give you the reason it says it is wrong. That might enlighten us a bit.


#126230 03/26/04 11:29 PM
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 164
member
OP Offline
member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 164
My grammar checker says that when using the sentence, “I am trying to understand the connotations of this particular usage of the English language.” That I should Check to see if you are missing a linking verb. (change “as you probably aware” to “as you are probably aware.”)

It says this when ever I employ the usage of “I” and “am” next to each other, no matter what the connotations of the sentence used.

Rev. Alimae


Rev. Alimae
#126231 03/26/04 11:34 PM
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 2,891
B
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
B
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 2,891
Well, you're right, there is no help there.

I'll let our linguistic experts handle this one because I can't spot the error at all.


#126232 03/26/04 11:44 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,475
J
veteran
Offline
veteran
J
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,475
I think the error lie in your tools and any reliance on them. Is it MS Word by any chance?


#126233 03/26/04 11:46 PM
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 2,891
B
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
B
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 2,891
I have MS Word. I plugged the sentence in and it came out fine. No grammar call-outs at all.


#126234 03/26/04 11:46 PM
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 164
member
OP Offline
member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 164
As a matter of fact it is Microsoft WordPerfect 9 that I have been using.

Rev. Alimae


Rev. Alimae
#126235 03/26/04 11:59 PM
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,230
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,230
Firstly, there is no such thing as Microsoft WordPerfect9. WordPerfect9 was produced by Corel Corporation. Secondly, if I paste the phrase,
“I am trying to understand the connotations of this particular usage of the English language.”
, into my copy of WordPerfect, and run both the spell checker and the grammar checker, the sentence passes without a single error being flagged. Perhaps you could give the exact phrase that is being flagged by your software?




#126236 03/27/04 12:01 AM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,661
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,661
I am positive that Microsoft doesn't sell a product called "WordPerfect".

EDIT - I am a looser... Hi, juan!

EDIT# 2 - Join the club, jheem

#126237 03/27/04 12:03 AM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,475
J
veteran
Offline
veteran
J
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,475
It used to be sold by Corel.


#126238 03/27/04 12:11 AM
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,230
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,230
>It used to be sold by Corel.

Having in my possession WordPerfect versions 9, 10, 11, and 12, I can repeat that WordPerfect is still a product of Corel.


#126239 03/27/04 12:15 AM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,661
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,661
Then please, by all means, go ahead and do so.
[darting down the alley-e]


#126240 03/27/04 12:16 AM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,475
J
veteran
Offline
veteran
J
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,475
Sorry, sjmaxq, didn't mean to impune your word processor. Is WordPerfect 9 still being sold by Corel?


#126241 03/27/04 12:22 AM
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,230
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,230
>. Is WordPerfect 9 still being sold by Corel?

No. Only 11 and pre-orders for 12. The only place I know of still selling WP9 is ebay, although I would be happy to accept offers for mine.


#126242 03/27/04 12:25 AM
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 164
member
OP Offline
member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 164
I do apologize, you are correct it is Corel not Microsoft.
As for the sentence “I am trying to understand the connotations of this particular usage of the English language.” the grammar check says what I posted earlier. It also says the same thing when I use any sentence with “I am” with in it.
The sentence that spurred me into asking my question here at AWAD was, “As I stated earlier, if I am incorrect in this it is understandable for I am the student and you are the teacher.
It does not matter what the sentence is that I employ the usage of “I am” within, I am given this exact same message.
Thus I was curious as to the correct connotations surrounding the proper usage of the words and as to wether or not they should be placed next to each other or if it was a phoepah (sp?) .

Rev. Alimae


Rev. Alimae
#126243 03/27/04 12:27 AM
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 164
member
OP Offline
member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 164
Just remembered the correct spelling, it is Fau Paux, I do apologise for that mis-spell.

Rev. Alimae


Rev. Alimae
#126244 03/27/04 12:31 AM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,475
J
veteran
Offline
veteran
J
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,475
Just a guess, but is your WordPerfect using an English dictionary and/or grammar checker? I believe the phrase you're looking for is faux pas French for mistep (literally 'false step').


#126245 03/27/04 12:37 AM
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 164
member
OP Offline
member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 164
Jheem,
Yes, that is the word I am looking for. It looks as if my memory is faulty today along with my typing. Lol, makes thing interesting to say the least.

Rev. Alimae


Rev. Alimae
#126246 03/27/04 12:38 AM
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 164
member
OP Offline
member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 164
As far as I know of my WordPerfect uses an English Dictionary, I am not to sure as to wether or not it uses an english grammer checker though. For all I know, it does.

Rev. Alimae


Rev. Alimae
#126247 03/27/04 12:39 AM
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,230
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,230
I just tried," As I stated earlier, if I am incorrect in this it is understandable for I am the student and you are the teacher. in WordPerfect and again received no error or warning messages from either the spell checker or the Grammatik. I think jheem's suggestion is one that bears investigating. Check the language settings for your WordPerfect, to make sure that the correct dictionaries and grammar tools are being used. I would also recommend checking in at http://www.wpuniverse.com, a help forum for users of WordPerfect, in case there is a glitch in your copy. Clearly, there is nothing wrong with the sentence as you have posted it here.


#126248 03/27/04 12:42 AM
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 164
member
OP Offline
member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 164
Sjmaxq,
I sincerely appreciate your assistance in my little dilemma. I shall follow up on your suggestions in the hopes of discovering the problem with my system.
Thank you.

Rev. Alimae


Rev. Alimae
#126249 03/27/04 12:48 AM
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 164
member
OP Offline
member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 164
I wish to thank all of you who have assisted me in my little problem and helping me to understand that “I” and “am” can be placed next to each other without there being a grammatical error. I would also, in closing, like to say that I am honored to have so many people willing to lend a helping hand, as well as to be allowed the opportunity of being a part of such an informative online community.

Thank you,

Rev. Alimae


Rev. Alimae
#126250 03/27/04 01:49 AM
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,542
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,542
>EDIT - I am a looser...

>EDIT# 2 - Join the club, jheem

yes indeed, musick; only a looser would "impune" jheem's previously unsullied reputation in advantia. what are you, some kind of clairvoyant?



#126251 03/27/04 01:56 AM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,475
J
veteran
Offline
veteran
J
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,475
Joke's lost on me, china. Mind giving me the punch line, and I'll work backwards from there.


#126252 03/27/04 01:57 AM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,475
J
veteran
Offline
veteran
J
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,475
tsuwm. Sorry, I don't get it. Have I done something to upset you and musick?


#126253 03/27/04 02:06 AM
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,542
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,542
jheem,

1. you didn't mean to "impune" max's word processor. impune (unpunished) was listed as "rare" by Webster in 1913. the word wanted is "impugn".
b. musick's comment about joining the club came *before this faw-paw, which was most prescient.
iii. china?!

-ron (not very) obvious


#126254 03/27/04 02:11 AM
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 164
member
OP Offline
member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 164
Tsuwm and Musick,
I did not mean to start a post that was going to cause any internal problems. For this I do appologise.

Rev. Alimae


Rev. Alimae
#126255 03/27/04 03:02 AM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,475
J
veteran
Offline
veteran
J
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,475
a. Just too much Latin: nemo me impune lacessit. Sorry for the misspelling.

b. Cockney rhyming slang: china plate rhymes with mate: friend. First heard it in an Eno song.


Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 7,210
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 7,210
thanks for clearing all that up, guys. I can relax now...



formerly known as etaoin...
#126257 03/27/04 03:53 AM
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,230
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,230
Tsuwm, in another forum, an idiot sauvage of our mutual acquaintance was moved to say, "subtlety is wasted on the Web." Maybe he got that one right.


#126258 03/27/04 04:44 AM
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,624
Pooh-Bah
Offline
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,624
You don't usually just say "china" when you mean "mate". The normal usage is "me old china", as in "Just off down the pub. Fancy a pint, me old china?"


#126259 03/27/04 01:30 PM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
a post that was going to cause any internal problems.

Don't worry about it, Alimae. We have a core of fast friends who know when to poke each others mickey (not to mention taking the borax). Jheem, despite his old-handedness, is a relative newbie, but he seems to be catching on. Just don't take things too seriously and you'll fit right in.


#126260 03/27/04 02:21 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,475
J
veteran
Offline
veteran
J
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,475
Thanks for the clarification, Capfka.


#126261 03/27/04 03:57 PM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,661
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,661
tsuwm - I'll have to put a time stamps on my edits in the future... and maybe not get "called away in an emergency" (or was that an emergent sea) whilst in the middle of time traveling.

Fear not dearest AlimaeHP, Faldage has explained it clearly (ahem) as has our buddy sjmaxq: the "idiot sauvage" strikes again!

Maybe, at this juncture, someone should explain the difference between a "yart", a "mantle" and "clairvoyance". Disappearing into the future

#126262 03/27/04 04:31 PM
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,624
Pooh-Bah
Offline
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,624
No problem, jheem. Like a lot of colloquialisms, there's roolz an' there's roolz. You might refer to some absent person as "me china", as in "I saw me china the other day", although these days I think that's probably taking Cockneyism to extremes. But calling someone "me old china" is still seen as "normal", although the tone of voice determines whether the addressee is really your mate or someone you're about to give a bit'uv GBH to. "Me old china" seems to have successfully made the perilous transition from being an expression of pure cockney rhyming slang to an everyday role in Estuary English. I hear it used a lot, and not necessarily by people from the London area.


#126263 03/27/04 04:39 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,475
J
veteran
Offline
veteran
J
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,475
The really interesting thing about Cockney rhyming slang is that the part of the phrase (in this instance "china plate") that rhymes and could give you a clue about the meaning is left off. Ex: "old china [plate]" == mate; "potatoes [in the mould]" == cold; etc.


#126264 03/27/04 04:52 PM
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,624
Pooh-Bah
Offline
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,624
Yup, that's the whole idea, of course. But even that's not consistent. For instance, "dog and bone" for "phone" is a pure rhyme. "Richard" for turd is not. Why isn't "dog and bone" also abbreviated to "dog"? The nature of the beast, I suppose!

Anyhow, it's living and breathing. If you're interested, look at http://www.aldertons.com/english-.htm


#126265 03/27/04 10:20 PM
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 2,204
R
Pooh-Bah
Offline
Pooh-Bah
R
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 2,204
Yup, that's the whole idea, of course.
to elucidate a little on Pfranz's excellent summary of rhyming slang. It grew up in C19 London (although it's roots are probably at least C18, possibly earlier) after the formation of the Metropolitan Police force in 1829 (I think the date's right - I haven't checked, but I'm not more nor a coupla yrs out, at worst!)
Many of the activities of the Cockneys were outside the law and it was necessary to use a cant so that important conversations were not understood by outsiders who happened to over hear.
In this respect, it is a bit like pidgin, only in reverse - pidgin was invented so that orders could be given to servants in a language that was not sophisticated enough to enable them to understand English as spoken by the Imperial Rulers of the pink bits of the world.


Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 4 5

Moderated by  Jackie 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics13,912
Posts229,283
Members9,179
Most Online3,341
Dec 9th, 2011
Newest Members
TRIALNERRA, befuddledmind, KILL_YOUR_SUV, Heather_Turey, Standy
9,179 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 442 guests, and 3 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days)
Top Posters
wwh 13,858
Faldage 13,803
Jackie 11,613
tsuwm 10,542
wofahulicodoc 10,510
LukeJavan8 9,916
AnnaStrophic 6,511
Wordwind 6,296
of troy 5,400
Disclaimer: Wordsmith.org is not responsible for views expressed on this site. Use of this forum is at your own risk and liability - you agree to hold Wordsmith.org and its associates harmless as a condition of using it.

Home | Today's Word | Yesterday's Word | Subscribe | FAQ | Archives | Search | Feedback
Wordsmith Talk | Wordsmith Chat

© 1994-2024 Wordsmith

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5