|About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us|
You are not logged in. [Log In] Wordsmith.org » Forums » General Topics » Q&A about words » Against Weather? Register User Forum List Calendar Active Topics Search FAQ
#120658 - 01/21/04 08:23 AM Re: Against Weather?
Yes, there are always some rocks that take longer to grind down to sand
#120659 - 01/21/04 08:23 AM Re: Against Weather?
Loc: Utter Placebo, Planet Reebok
'Ere, you little twerp, bring that dining room chair in off the beach this instant! You'll get it all wet an' mucky. You just wait 'til your father gets 'ome!
-- Knutty's Mum
#120660 - 01/21/04 08:27 AM Re: Against Weather?
Loc: Louisville, Kentucky
darn, yuh got ahead by 30 seconds! Not my fault that you were too long coming! (See Dunlendings.)
#120661 - 01/21/04 08:27 AM Re: Against Weather?
French underwent a storm of elisions, and survived it very
I doubt that an accumulations of elisions would improve English. Perhaps we can blow the whistle on them, and
keep the consonants, and avoid confusion.
#120662 - 01/21/04 08:34 AM Re: Against Weather?
Loc: Seattle, Washington, USA
Knutty sez: But if a word appears to be changing in a way that seems (to me) ugly, then I don't have to be a passive observer, I reserve the right to resist the change.
Many of the definitional changes in Modern English tend toward imprecision. A term which has a narrow usage is used sloppily. The definition broadens, following the poor usage. The language, capable of great precision, becomes less precise ... as does the thinking of those who damaged it. (When you're my age, you can say curmudgeonly things like this and get away with it.)
#120663 - 01/21/04 08:39 AM Re: Against Weather? (an aside)
Loc: lower upstate New York
When I saw this subject line, I immediately thought of the French (and Portuguese, and maybe Spanish) term contretemps/contratempo. [/aside]
#120664 - 01/21/04 08:41 AM Re: Against Weather?
Forget it - this was far too late to be relevant! Comes from trying to answer the 'phone while (whilst?) posting.
#120665 - 01/21/04 08:43 AM Re: Against Weather?
Many of the definitional changes in Modern English tend toward imprecision
Then other words crop up to fill in the void and y'all complain about those.
#120666 - 01/21/04 08:52 AM Re: Against Weather?
Only the ugly sounding ones!
#120667 - 01/21/04 09:24 AM Re: Against Weather?
A term which has a narrow usage is used sloppily. The definition broadens, following the poor usage. The language, capable of great precision, becomes less precise ... as does the thinking of those who damaged it.
Sorry, Padre, I just don't buy it. Seems there was a thread hereabouts recently about how the Golden Age of Yore (tm) wasn't always what it was cracked up to be. Same with language. Take Latin. Is it more or less precise than French or Italian? Did Neanderthals speak a precise language of utter purity? Why aren't we grunting out monosyllables all meaning the same thing? Is English any worse off now that silly means 'foolish' rather than 'happy, innocent, pitiable, feeble' as it did in Middle English? The problem is this: languages change. Always have, alweays will. The only known way of stopping a language from changing is to set the number of its speakers to zero. I am reminded of Canute on the beach.
I think that people with poor critical thinking skills and poor verbal skills use a language in an inprecise manner. The same could be said of somebody using a hammer sideways to hammer in a screw. Is the hammer any less of a hammer. Oh, now I feel like Canute. (Sorry, Father Steve, just a pet peeve of mine.)
Forum Stats 8951 Members
Max Online: 3341 @ 12/09/11 02:15 PM
Newest Members MarlSF, jfw, hiscientist, MaineMrC, michor
8951 Registered Users
Who's Online 0 registered (), 33 Guests and 5 Spiders online. Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters (30 Days)
wofahulicodoc 75 LukeJavan8 58 may2point0 37 jheem 1
wwh 13858 Faldage 13803 Jackie 11613 tsuwm 10538 LukeJavan8 8477 Buffalo Shrdlu 7210 wofahulicodoc 6851 AnnaStrophic 6511 Wordwind 6296 of troy 5400
Board Rules · Mark all read Contact Us · Wordsmith.org · Top
Disclaimer: Wordsmith.org is not responsible for views expressed on this site. Use of this forum is at your own risk and liability - you agree to hold Wordsmith.org and its associates harmless as a condition of using it.
Home | Today's Word | Yesterday's Word | Subscribe | FAQ | Archives | Search | Feedback
Wordsmith Talk | Wordsmith Chat
© 1994-2016 Wordsmith