Wordsmith.org: the magic of words

Wordsmith Talk

About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us  

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 3 of 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
#11656 - 12/04/00 07:46 PM Re: You done good, Marty.  
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Faldage Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Faldage  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Be warned that I am a Fool and as such I am not required to explain my cryptic remarks, but since I am new here I will say that the whaddaya wanna comment and the infinitely regressive comment were not meant to be linked in any way.

I stand by my distinction between the plurals fish and fishes.


#11657 - 12/04/00 09:01 PM Re: You done good, Marty.  
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,094
Jazzoctopus Offline
old hand
Jazzoctopus  Offline
old hand

Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,094
Cincinnati & Loveland, Ohio, U...
I stand by my distinction between the plurals fish and fishes.

I can't confirm or deny, but this does make some sense if you compare it with "people" and "peoples".

But then . . . does "mooses" mean a group of different types of moose?


#11658 - 12/04/00 09:41 PM Re: You done good, Marty.  
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 2,891
belMarduk Offline
Carpal Tunnel
belMarduk  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 2,891
Moose, the beast, is both plural and singular. Mousse, the foamy stuff you put in your hair, is also plural and singular. Perhaps it is just a matter of what sounds better since mousse is a relatively new invention.


#11659 - 12/04/00 10:02 PM Re: You done good, Marty.  
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 347
Marty Offline
enthusiast
Marty  Offline
enthusiast

Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 347
Melbourne, Australia
In reply to:

Moose, the beast, is both plural and singular. Mousse, the foamy stuff you put in your hair, is also plural and singular. Perhaps it is just a matter of what sounds better since mousse is a relatively new invention.


Not sure that I agree with your reasoning or choice of words there, bel. I think mousse is an example of an uncountable mass of substance that Bingley referred to. I would say 1 moose, 2 moose, but never 1 mousse, 2 mousse. On the other hand, I might say "I had two different mousses to choose from this morning" which is probably a lazy abbreviation for "two different kinds of mousse". Same applies to a lot of uncountable mass nouns - try substituting honey, jam, oil, wheat, sand,.. for mousse (in the sentence, bel, not your hair!)



#11660 - 12/05/00 05:22 AM Re: You done good, Marty.  
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,065
Bingley Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Bingley  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,065
Jakarta
In reply to:

I might say "I had two different mousses to choose from this morning" which is probably a lazy abbreviation for "two different kinds of mousse". Same applies to a lot of uncountable mass nouns - try substituting honey, jam, oil, wheat, sand,.. for mousse (in the sentence, bel, not your hair!)


Don't put yourself down Marty, it's not a lazy abbreviation at all. It's just the way English works. Uncountable nouns, if their meaning allows it, can be made countable nouns with the meaning "different kinds of".

Beer of course could be substituted in the sentence and in your hair.

Bingley



Bingley
#11661 - 12/05/00 05:43 AM Re: You done good, Marty.  
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 444
Bridget Offline
addict
Bridget  Offline
addict

Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 444
Sydney Australia
>Beer of course could be substituted in the sentence and in your hair.<

Waste of good beer!
(Of course, if you have any bad beer, do what you like with it...)


#11662 - 12/05/00 09:33 AM Re: Plurality of plurals  
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,027
wsieber Offline
old hand
wsieber  Offline
old hand

Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,027
Switzerland
the difference between countable nouns and uncountable nouns
So far so good, but I still don't see where fish and sheep fit in here. If I am not mistaken, you would rather say "fish were plentiful in the sea" than "..was..".


#11663 - 12/05/00 11:03 AM Re: Plurality of plurals  
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,346
FishonaBike Offline
veteran
FishonaBike  Offline
veteran

Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,346
Sussex, England
you would rather say "fish were plentiful in the sea" than "..was..".

I think you could say both, wsieb.

"fish was plentiful in the area" treats "fish" as a general commodity.

Conversely - I don't know why - but "sheep was plentiful in the area" doesn't work at all.

Is it significant that you can say "I eat fish" but you wouldn't generally say "I eat sheep" ?

- As "lamb was plentiful in the area" sounds OK.






#11664 - 12/05/00 01:25 PM Re: Plurality of plurals  
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,027
wsieber Offline
old hand
wsieber  Offline
old hand

Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,027
Switzerland
you wouldn't generally say "I eat sheep" ..
..because you can say "I eat mutton" - and also: "mutton was plentiful.."
Certainly the commodity aspect is more relevant here than the "uncountable" property.- But, Bingley, is this linguistics or something else?


#11665 - 12/05/00 01:33 PM Re: Plurals ?  
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,439
wow Offline
Carpal Tunnel
wow  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,439
New England, USA
If the plural of mouse is mice,
Is the plural of spouse spice?
wow


Page 3 of 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Moderated by  Jackie 

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics13,878
Posts223,864
Members9,013
Most Online3,341
Dec 9th, 2011
Newest Members
Ahmed, KathrynH, Waqar_Ali, brecht, Akintola
9013 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 49 guests, and 3 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days)
Top Posters(All Time)
wwh 13,858
Faldage 13,803
Jackie 11,613
tsuwm 10,538
LukeJavan8 8,961
AnnaStrophic 6,511
Wordwind 6,296
of troy 5,400
Disclaimer: Wordsmith.org is not responsible for views expressed on this site. Use of this forum is at your own risk and liability - you agree to hold Wordsmith.org and its associates harmless as a condition of using it.

Home | Today's Word | Yesterday's Word | Subscribe | FAQ | Archives | Search | Feedback
Wordsmith Talk | Wordsmith Chat

© 1994-2017 Wordsmith

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.016s Queries: 13 (0.003s) Memory: 2.7362 MB (Peak: 2.8696 MB) Zlib disabled. Server Time: 2017-08-22 20:45:51 UTC