|About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us|
You are not logged in. [Log In] Wordsmith.org » Forums » General Topics » Q&A about words » Dis/uninterested Register User Forum List Calendar Active Topics Search FAQ
#114328 - 10/24/03 09:16 AM Dis/uninterested
The word pair disinterested/uninterested is one that sparks some debate in certain circles. As you may be aware, the present day, prescribed definitions are the reverse of what they were several hundred years ago, as a trip to your friendly local OED will confirm (or even AHD4 at http://www.bartleby.com/61/32/D0273200.html). David Carkeet, in his light-hearted TVR article in the September issue (http://www.vocabula.com/2003/VRSept03Carkeet.htm) points out that these words, among others, do not exactly lend themselves to a great stability in meaning. I.e., there is nothing particular about the word disinterested that speaks for it meaning unbiased, impartial as opposed to lacking in interest.
Can anyone think of any other pairs of words that would belong to this dis/un family?
#114329 - 10/24/03 09:31 AM Re: Dis/uninterested
Loc: this too shall pass
purely as a matter of interest, you understand, this is a many time yart. one of the instances links to the M-W usage gloss.
#114330 - 10/24/03 09:31 AM Re: Dis/uninterested
Disinterred would mean dug up. Uninterred would mean not buried. At least that is my impression.
#114331 - 10/24/03 09:42 AM Re: Dis/uninterested
Good one, Dr Bill.
And, tsuwm, the long involved explanation was using dis/uninterested merely as a starting point. Mainly I'm interested in word pairs such as the one offered by Dr Bill. I plead not guilty to any charge of default and yartery.
#114332 - 10/24/03 12:58 PM Re: Dis/uninterested
Loc: British Columbia, Canada
On a slight tangent check out Trustfulness/trustworthyness in Meta-words south of the line.
#114333 - 10/24/03 04:21 PM jointedness
Loc: Seattle, Washington, USA
Disjointed means that the object was, at one time, connected at the joints, but these are either broken or out of place. Unjointed means that the object had no joints in the first place.
#114334 - 10/24/03 04:36 PM a detour
Loc: lower upstate New York
Father Steve's post reminded me of something: the correct term for Siamese twins now is "co-joined" twins. Why not "joined"?
#114335 - 10/24/03 04:43 PM Re: a detour
Loc: Metro Detroit (MI)
I've only ever seen it as "conjoined" when referring to twins, but the question still holds: What's wrong with plain old "joined?"
#114336 - 10/24/03 05:27 PM Re: a detour
What's wrong with plain old "joined?"
Conjoined, to clearly characterise a seamless contiguity. Plain join doesn't do that.
#114337 - 10/24/03 06:07 PM Re: jointedness
Another good one. Thanks, Father.
Forum Stats 8910 Members
Max Online: 3341 @ 12/09/11 02:15 PM
Newest Members folatre, Rockyhud220, L82cannon, tien170164, ramulusri
8910 Registered Users
Who's Online 1 registered (Jackie), 238 Guests and 2 Spiders online. Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters (30 Days)
wofahulicodoc 80 endymion6 78 LukeJavan8 61 May 26 BranShea 3 Markubus5 2 Tromboniator 1 peter_in_boston 1 Hansje1980 1
wwh 13858 Faldage 13803 Jackie 11613 tsuwm 10537 LukeJavan8 8047 Buffalo Shrdlu 7210 AnnaStrophic 6511 wofahulicodoc 6420 Wordwind 6296 of troy 5400
Board Rules · Mark all read Contact Us · Wordsmith.org · Top
Disclaimer: Wordsmith.org is not responsible for views expressed on this site. Use of this forum is at your own risk and liability - you agree to hold Wordsmith.org and its associates harmless as a condition of using it.
Home | Today's Word | Yesterday's Word | Subscribe | FAQ | Archives | Search | Feedback
Wordsmith Talk | Wordsmith Chat
© 1994-2016 Wordsmith