Wordsmith.org: the magic of words

Wordsmith Talk

About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us  

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
#148037 09/19/05 03:38 AM
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,230
sjmaxq Offline OP
Carpal Tunnel
OP Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,230
A NZ barrister, newly elected to our House of Representatives, and an interesting use of the word "self":

http://www.stuff.co.nz/stuff/0,2106,3414421a14095,00.html

It's certainly not the way I would use "self-define", since those doing the defining are not the person being defined, but maybe I'm just reading it incorrectly?




#148038 09/19/05 05:10 AM
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,027
old hand
Offline
old hand
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,027
Since Mr Finlayson studied Latin, French and Law he probably feels entitled to re-define words. He seems to mean "define in their own private way". Elsewhere too, an inflationary use of the prefix "self-" is to be observed, e.g. the omnipresent "self-organised".


#148039 09/19/05 05:26 AM
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 273
V
enthusiast
Offline
enthusiast
V
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 273
I would "self-define" him as not particularly good at clear expression:

In reply to:

"I consider myself not a conservative at all. I consider myself a liberal, a liberal conservative."


(e.a.)


#148040 09/19/05 10:16 PM
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 10,534
Likes: 1
W
Carpal Tunnel
Online Content
Carpal Tunnel
W
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 10,534
Likes: 1
Nothing so revolutionary here! Strephon, who was half a fairy, did exactly that:

FAIRY QUEEN:.... I've a borough or two at my disposal. Would you like to go into Parliament?

IOLANTHE: A fairy Member! That would be delightful!

STREPHON: I'm afraid I should do no good there - you see, down to the waist, I'm a Tory of the most determined description, but my legs are a couple of confounded Radicals, and, on a division, they'd be sure to take me into the wrong lobby. You see, they're two to one, which is a strong working majority.

QUEEN: Don't let that distress you; you shall be returned as a Liberal-Conservative, and your legs shall be our peculiar care...


-- Iolanthe, Act I (emphasis added)

You don't suppose that the good Mr Finlayson was being simultaneously erudite, clever, and ironic, all rolled into one?

[Edit: And on a more serious note - is that a peculiar use of "peculiar"? It was, after all, over a hundred years ago. from context it means particular and specific.]

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 273
V
enthusiast
Offline
enthusiast
V
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 273
>You don't suppose that the good Mr Finlayson was being simultaneously erudite, clever, and ironic, all rolled into one?

I have no issue with the label liberal-conservative, except when it is used immediately following an assertion that he is no sort of conservative at all.


Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,661
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,661
I have no issue with the label liberal-conservative..

But would you have an issue with conservative-liberal? Is this an NZ *thing?

Because of the US'ns prevailing *dichotomy having a significant effect, I would have issue with either of thair use... but I suppose I live here. <wink>


Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 273
V
enthusiast
Offline
enthusiast
V
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 273
> liberal-conservative..

I think of it as a sort of social/fiscal comparison. Socially liberal, fiscally conservative. As here:
http://www.digitalronin.f2s.com/politicalcompass/


Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,661
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,661
Ah... the old apples-oranges issue?! :)


Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,154
Z
Zed Offline
Pooh-Bah
Offline
Pooh-Bah
Z
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,154
Labels don't mean much here in British Columbia where the liberal party is the far right of our political spectrum. Go figure.


#148046 09/21/05 04:21 AM
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 247
W
enthusiast
Offline
enthusiast
W
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 247
It's certainly not the way I would use "self-define", since those doing the defining are not the person being defined, but maybe I'm just reading it incorrectly?

"It is not the way anyone would use self-define", says sjmaxq.

But, with respect, that's the point, sjmaxq.

This individual is trying to say something quotable. You don't say something quotable by saying something everyone else says.

You say something everyone else doesn't say.

That's how you get quoted.

Savvy politician.




Page 1 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  Jackie 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics13,913
Posts229,316
Members9,182
Most Online3,341
Dec 9th, 2011
Newest Members
Ineffable, ddrinnan, TRIALNERRA, befuddledmind, KILL_YOUR_SUV
9,182 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
1 members (wofahulicodoc), 604 guests, and 2 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days)
Top Posters
wwh 13,858
Faldage 13,803
Jackie 11,613
tsuwm 10,542
wofahulicodoc 10,533
LukeJavan8 9,916
AnnaStrophic 6,511
Wordwind 6,296
of troy 5,400
Disclaimer: Wordsmith.org is not responsible for views expressed on this site. Use of this forum is at your own risk and liability - you agree to hold Wordsmith.org and its associates harmless as a condition of using it.

Home | Today's Word | Yesterday's Word | Subscribe | FAQ | Archives | Search | Feedback
Wordsmith Talk | Wordsmith Chat

© 1994-2024 Wordsmith

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5