Wordsmith.org: the magic of words

Wordsmith Talk

About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us  

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
#199763 05/11/11 07:17 AM
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 8
stranger
OP Offline
stranger
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 8
Introducing the word "anomia" WS said i.a. "...there are words for almost everything under the sun (and beyond)."

I have encountered a need for a word a couple of times lately. The concept resembles "ghost word", for which I recently provided some material to Wikipedia, but it is not identical.

Example: an article author used a word "creosite", which looked like a typo for "creosote", and it had a link (albeit nonfunctional) to "creosite" as well. Now, I am fairly advanced in chemical matters, and I found some thousands of hits in Google for "creosite", but most of them looked unconvincing; after all, other people than that author can also create typos.

It took over an hour's work before I was confident enough to change the Wikipedia entry to "creosote", because it is very difficult to prove a negative; and it is a very serious matter to alter a correct entry to an error, with only one's own ago for justification. In fact, even now I have a strong suspicion that "creosite" might well be an obsolete variant (there are similar obsolete variants for other substances, such as "benzole" for "benzene" etc), or even a particular grade, like the difference between treacle and molasses. I am still woeking in it, and any comments on that point would also be welcome.

Be that as it may, does anyone in forum know of a word for a non-existent word, used in error, looking convincing, (in principle there could easily be such a word as "creosite"; in fact it appears in a book on geology for something totally different (but as far as I can tell, that is a typo for "coesite"!)) but a word that one cannot easily prove to be an error just because it "aint in the dictionary"?

If it were an error that had won its way to its own entry in the dictionary, then it would be a true ghost word, but so far it is just a persuasive error that is hard to distinguish from a rarely used technicalism. What should we call such an utterance? "Phantom word"? "Fatuverb"? "Miragon"? (No emoticon for "stumped"? Or "puzzled"? Sorry!)

Over to anyone...

Jon


Jon
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Or misspelling.

Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 9,916
Likes: 2
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 9,916
Likes: 2


WELCOME JONRICHFIELD


----please, draw me a sheep----
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,542
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,542
ghost word - an accidental word form never in
established usage; especially: one arising from an
editorial or typographical error or a mistaken
pronunciation (as phantomnation or dord)

*Webster's New International Dict., 2nd ed.


the worthless word for the day is: mountweazel

[see quotes]
a bogus entry purposely inserted into a reference
work: a copyright trap

"Turn to page 1,850 of the 1975 edition of the New
Columbia Encyclopedia and you'll find an entry for
Lillian Virginia Mountweazel, a fountain designer
turned photographer.. she never existed."
- Henry Alford, The New Yorker Aug. 29, 2005

"And only publishing insiders know that a Mountweazel
is "a bogus entry purposely inserted in a dictionary
or encyclopedia as a means of protecting copyright.""
- William Safire, N.Y. Times Mag. Dec 3, 2006

Joined: May 2011
Posts: 8
stranger
OP Offline
stranger
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 8
You have a point of course; misspelling is a major cause, and there is reason to debate whether one should count finger trouble in the same category as a misspelling. That is an open question.

Some of the examples I have in mind are misunderstandings (wrong word, valid but incorrect, or even inappropriate in sense or syntax), some are misremembered utterances, misheard pronunciations, misread typography or orthography, or mangled technical terms, such as Collectotriccem gleespohroides, where the perpetrator meant Colletotrichum gloeosporioides. One that still rankles is the modern acceptance of the generic name Crematogaster, in preference to the less appropriate Cremastogaster. I sweated blood settling that one!

And so very much on. I have been following up the creosote/creosite matter and have found various versions of acceptance and various of sources of error, ranging from the coesite, to a word of uncertain spelling for various grades of chimney soot. Oh, and a respectable publication mentions creosite as a commercial product, a cheaper version of creosote, marketed in Europe during the early decades of the 20th century. Also, remember that if there is no serious basis for wondering whether the term is valid, no special term would be needed; we could simply call it a mistake. Here we mean a putative mistake, with strong grounds for hesitating about pronouncing that it is indeed a mistake.

Oh, and there even appears to some performing group under the name Creosite! I am not sure that I wanted to know that...

I think the whole thing goes beyond spelling, though I certainly include spelling, miss, Ms or Mr, as one factor. In fact I am surprised at the rarity of ghost words, given the sheer scope for meme propagation.If all of them were as difficult to nail down as this one, I am sure that we would have them in droves; we would all be conversing in a creole of permanently propagating verbal novelties.

The things people fash themselves with...!


Jon
tsuwm #199783 05/11/11 04:38 PM
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 8
stranger
OP Offline
stranger
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 8
Niiiice! Very nice! Thanks for that little lot. Your response sent me doing a bit of surfing; found this site:

http://grammar.about.com/od/terms/f/whatisaghostword.htm

and was about to refer you to this one anyway:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghost_word

I may find myself moved to augment the latter in the light of your contribution.

Cheers,


Jon
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
I would bet on simple fumble-fingers in your creosote/creosite example. The I and the O are right next to each other on the keyboard and I have certainly hit the one when I was going for the other. Your description of some of the others sounds like it's bordering on eggcorns, but your examples don't look like eggcorns.

Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
O too have made that mistake; welcome, Jon.

Jackie #199795 05/12/11 10:34 AM
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 963
old hand
Offline
old hand
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 963
Noce, Jackoe.

Jackie #199938 05/19/11 06:21 PM
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 8
stranger
OP Offline
stranger
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 8
Wasn't Otoo a character (actually two characters (or two half characters)) in a JackLondon story?

Life is so unnecessarilycomplicated...

But I liked your welcome!

Thanks,

Jon


Jon
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3

Moderated by  Jackie 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics13,912
Posts229,283
Members9,179
Most Online3,341
Dec 9th, 2011
Newest Members
TRIALNERRA, befuddledmind, KILL_YOUR_SUV, Heather_Turey, Standy
9,179 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 444 guests, and 3 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days)
Top Posters
wwh 13,858
Faldage 13,803
Jackie 11,613
tsuwm 10,542
wofahulicodoc 10,510
LukeJavan8 9,916
AnnaStrophic 6,511
Wordwind 6,296
of troy 5,400
Disclaimer: Wordsmith.org is not responsible for views expressed on this site. Use of this forum is at your own risk and liability - you agree to hold Wordsmith.org and its associates harmless as a condition of using it.

Home | Today's Word | Yesterday's Word | Subscribe | FAQ | Archives | Search | Feedback
Wordsmith Talk | Wordsmith Chat

© 1994-2024 Wordsmith

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5