Wordsmith.org
Posted By: Sparteye Language Preservation Project - 08/10/05 04:49 PM
Here's an article about a project to collect and preserve information regarding dying languages.

http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2005-08-10-languages_x.htm

Posted By: Father Steve Re: Language Preservation Project - 08/10/05 06:40 PM
Is the Queen's English amongst them?

Posted By: Sparteye Re: Language Preservation Project - 08/10/05 11:30 PM
*rimshot*

Posted By: Vernon Compton Re: Language Preservation Project - 08/10/05 11:41 PM
*rimshot*

Or predictable prescriptivist whining. He didn't specify which Queen's English he thought should be preserved, or why. Is EIIR's English better than ER's, or VR's, or even AR's?

Posted By: Faldage Re: Language Preservation Project - 08/10/05 11:47 PM
Or even Queen Lili'uokalani.

Posted By: Father Steve The Invisible Committees - 08/11/05 03:50 AM
It is a little-known fact that the members of this board are divided up into committees by Anu, each in charge of a particular facet of our community life. As the chair of the Committee on Predictable Prescriptivist Whining, I make every effort to faithfully discharge the duties of my office.

Posted By: Faldage Re: The Invisible Committees - 08/11/05 09:33 AM
And as chairman of the Committee on Knee-Jerk Descriptivist Over-reaction it is my job to defend even the most egregious examples of attempts to sabotage the Integrity of the Language.

Posted By: tsuwm Re: The Invisible Committees - 08/11/05 11:44 AM
and as long as we're opening up in this unscharacteristic fashion, I am the Temporary Subaldermanic-underchairman of the Title XXXVII Abscondent Subcommittee for the Preservation of Obsolete and Archaic Glossomachical Verbiage; first meeting pending.

Posted By: Father Steve Re: The Invisible Committees - 08/11/05 12:18 PM
Faldage sez: it is my job to defend even the most egregious examples of attempts to sabotage the Integrity of the Language.

And the chair of PPW replies: and you make every effort to faithfully discharge the duties of (your) office.


Posted By: AnnaStrophic Re: picking nits - 08/11/05 12:44 PM
to faithfully discharge

Since when do prescriptivists split infinitives, good sir?

Posted By: maverick Re: The Invisible Committees - 08/11/05 02:31 PM
> unscharacteristic fashion

Couldn't find that one on even *really obscure sites like...

oh, but let me introduce myself: I am the new Acting Chairman (Unelected) of the Stinkin Rulez and General Oversight Committee. The past chair was deemed to be a witless slave to standing orders so has been ousted in a bloodless coup. And I've got my beady eye on the Vice Chair (Vice and Moral Rectitude Sub-committee) too, so I better not start seeing loads of Minutes and Agendas and stuff... Normal lack of service will now be resumed.

Posted By: Father Steve the well-split infinitive - 08/11/05 07:08 PM
The Lovely AnnaStrophic asks innocently: Since when do prescriptivists split infinitives, good sir?

"In fact, the split infinitive is distinguished both by its length of use and the greatness of its users. People have been splitting infinitives since the 14th century, and some of the most noteworthy splitters include John Donne, Samuel Pepys, Daniel Defoe, Benjamin Franklin, Samuel Johnson, William Wordsworth, Abraham Lincoln, George Eliot, Henry James, and Willa Cather." ~The American Heritage® Book of English Usage. Copyright © 1996 by Houghton Mifflin Company.

"Split infinitives have been in use since the 13th century, although by the 16th Century they were rare in some of the most notable authors. William Shakespeare used one, in Sonnet 142. " ~http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Split_infinitive

"The 'split' infinitive has taken such hold upon the consciences of journalists that, instead of warning the novice against splitting his infinitives, we must warn him against the curious superstition that the splitting or not splitting makes the difference between a good and a bad writer. The split infinitive is an ugly thing, as will be seen from our examples below; but it is one among several hundred ugly things, and the novice should not allow it to occupy his mind exclusively. Even that mysterious quality, 'distinction' of style, may in modest measure be attained by a splitter of infinitives." ~H.W. Fowler (1858–1933). The King’s English, 2nd ed. 1908.

And the humble vicar responds timidly: In my efforts to elevate my writing toward the level of Donne, Pepys, Defoe, Franklin, Johnson, Wordsworth, Lincoln, Eliot, James, Cather and Shakespeare, I have adopted the occasional use of the split infinitive. My prayer is that it, along with a few other bits, will give my writing "distinction of style." That failing, it at least provides a target, not unlike the duck which slowly crosses the range in a shooting gallery.

Posted By: inselpeter Re: the well-split infinitive - 08/11/05 08:37 PM
Alas, Fowler allows at best a modicum of that 'mysterious quality' to him who would splitter be.

Posted By: Zed RSPCE - 08/11/05 10:23 PM
or Royal Society for the Conservation and Protection of English.
I watched "The Adverture of English" last night on Knowledge Network and they talked about the movement to prevent the "degradation" of English. This was the motivating factor for Johnson's dictionary and the beginning of the idea of a single "correct" way to write/speak/use English.

edit before someone else has to point it out. No it was not called the RSPCE
Posted By: sjmaxq Re: RSPCE - 08/11/05 11:26 PM
Well, this thread has certainly livened up. I like the way you handled that young upstart Vernon, Fr. Steve. Meanwhile, Faldage and mav, can I join your committees?

Posted By: Father Steve Re: RSPCE - 08/12/05 01:49 AM
The RSPCE or RSCPE -- you made that up, right? I found a group called "SPELL" on the Internet which seems to come close, but nothing quite like the elegantly-named society you suggested.

Posted By: maverick Re: RSPCE - 08/12/05 02:46 PM
> can I join your committees?

There's likely nothing in the stinkin rulez against it...

Posted By: Zed Re: RSPCE - 08/12/05 03:34 PM
RSPCE is made up but you can join anyway. The membership fee is one sovereign payable to Jane Austen and you must promise to write with a quill pen on parchment.

Posted By: maverick Re: RSPCE - 08/12/05 04:08 PM
quillpenandparchment is available for registration with all major domain suffixes including ~.com, .co.uk and others, and will cost you only £109 for 2 years so mail me now with your fastest express carrier pigeon before someone else gets in first.

Posted By: Faldage Re: RSPCE - 08/12/05 09:26 PM
can I join your committees?

I do bleeve I seen you say "onliest" and "or either" so you in.

Posted By: Jackie Re: RSPCE - 08/13/05 12:21 AM
Yes, but will he have any r-e-s-p-e-c-t?

Posted By: Zed Re: RSPCE - 08/15/05 03:50 PM
ReSPeCtEd Jackie - Nice one.

© Wordsmith.org