has anyone else noticed that our "political thread" is taking a looong time to load?! it's around 250 Kbytes, not to mention that it has more than the requiisite... site... site 99 replies.
I've noticed. I haven't been reading it but.
<I haven't been reading it but.>
I ain't no inglish major, but is there something missing ere?
It's Aussie-speak, Chemeng.
(not that I am one but).
S'right, Chemeng - I was there when the finer points of its usage were explained to us. We don't know if we're doing it right, as it was explained by a Zildian, but.
Hi, CapK
our "political thread" is taking a looong time to load?! ... and even longer to read
(which is why I've goven up bothering to!)
I've goven up bothering to!
You might even say you forwent reading it.
The inability of my finger to distinguish between "i" and "o" keys makes me look like a bithering idiot!
are there any statistics covering the most frequent typing errors? I realize that many get corrected without ever being read, but just wondering. I know that I mess up I and O more than anything else.
this may open up discussion of Dvorak keyboards and the like, but, hey, that could be fun.
Oh, Rhuby, you mistake me. Far from calling you an odoit, I had assumed you were using goven jocularly.
I had assumed you were using goven jocularly
No - I forwent jocularity this time.
statistics covering the most frequent typing errors
And are there any spell checkers that take them into account? I most frequently reverse letters, particularly when they are in oppostie hands. Another is getting pgg regoister or, what I call fumble fingers, hitting two adjacent keys simultaneously.
I am much the same, but in my case it is alloyed with a firm belief that I can't get any thing wrong. This makes proof reading un-necessary.
No - I forwent jocularity this time.
should that be No - I forwent jocularity this tome?
I forwent jocularity this time.
I suppose you can be forgoven.
this tome
As usual, OT, one word from you is worth a volume.