Wordsmith.org
Posted By: Wordsmith Why - 05/31/02 10:20 AM
A few weeks ago when I featured a week of words from the world of law,
I hardly had any inkling of how soon I'll be facing that world in
practice, not just in words.

I un-banned Keiva only after consulting Jackie and both of us agreed
there was no other option. Sorry to know that some are disappointed,
but we do not have time or resources to fight a lawsuit.

This online community of wordlovers is bigger than any one person,
be it Keiva, Jackie, Anu, or anyone else. Let's not make this an
"either him or me" issue. Perhaps we can learn from English -- it accepts words
from all languages whether it's what some consider a "barbaric" tongue,
or a "refined" one. If we do not like a particular word, all we have
to do is ignore it, we do not need to tear out that page from the
dictionary. I do hope Jackie will be back as she has contributed
a lot and we all need her special love sprinkled on the board.

Happy words to all!

A very great part of the mischief that vex this world arises from words.
-Edmund Burke, statesman and writer (1729-1797)


Posted By: Keiva Re: Why - 05/31/02 11:14 AM
"Wordsmith.org is not responsible for views expressed on this site." Sorry, sir, but we all remain responsible for our own words.

both of us agreed there was no other option.

Not accurate, sir.
For example, you may recall that I said that one altenative was for me to set up a like board at my own expense. (Recall that in that context you shared with me your experience of the dollar-costs involved, and the number you quoted was triva). That approach has its downsides, of course, but it was one of several you and I considered in an attempt to resolve this amicably.

Edit: If you continue to believe your post was accurate, you have my permission to publish the entire correspondence, between you (or your administator) and me following my banning and pertaining to that subject. Should you think it productive to do so.
Posted By: Wordsmith Re: Why - 05/31/02 11:28 AM
Keiva,

You enquired the cost of software. I told you. I asked you what you wanted: you mentioned getting back on AWADtalk. If setting up a separate board was an option for you, we would be talking about the joy of words here, not about this whole mess. If it's still an option for you, please consider exercising that option.

Posted By: Keiva Re: side point - 05/31/02 06:36 PM
Dear Mr. Garg:

In view of the laws of libel, I would suggest that you delete my legal name where it has been used in various posts -- including at least four times today.

While this may not necessarily be curative of possible libel, it could reduce the scope thereof.

Posted By: Faldage Re: side point - 05/31/02 06:52 PM
delete my legal name

I'm no legal authority but I would wonder whether this could be considered destruction of evidence.

Posted By: of troy Re: Why - 05/31/02 07:16 PM
Dear Mr. Garg,
Keiva (aka Kenneth Spector, Aphonic Rants, and KeivaCarpal, and et. al.) publicly displayed his full legal name for many months in his profile. (yes, i am aware he does not do so now, but he did for many months.) He made the information public of his own accord.

I have the right to free speech. Keiva(and his alias's) had no hesitation using my name in posts, after i made it clear to him that i was no longer interesting in any thing he had to say.. by doing so, he was created an impression the we were still friends, and on a first name basis.

I see no reason why I, or anyone else can't use his name in posts.. unless of course, he is now threatening everyone who types his name? If he is, well, the worst has come, I too am being threatened by this man. I too have my name in my profile. In a kind of naive openness on my part, my name is available in my profile. To save him the effort, let me say, Of Troy is also known as Helen Griffin.

I think it would be a very interesting case.. a civil case naming me, for an actionable use of his name? In a public? or at the very least, semi public forum, where he once openly posted his name?

It doesn't sound like he has a case.. but, whether he does or doesn't, if he filed it in the Illinois courts, it would be very expensive for me to deal with, wouldn't it? And i might lose, not on an merit, but simply because I might not be able to afford to mount a defense from 5 states away (Rt 80, most direct land route from NY to Chicago, NY, NJ, PA, OH, IN, IL). Situated, in Chicago, it would be very easy for him to peruse the case rigorously, and last minute delays would have a negligible impact on his ability to conduct his business, but would have a major impact on my life; and as an a person with a good deal of knowledge of the law, he would have a second advantage.

So threatening a law suit, even if if is with out merit, it threatening my livelyhood-- it is a very real threat.

helen (of troy)


Posted By: Drow Re: Why - 06/01/02 12:46 AM
>If we do not like a particular word, all we have
to do is ignore it, we do not need to tear out that page from the dictionary.
--
Well written.


Posted By: Bobyoungbalt Re: Why - 06/01/02 02:02 AM
Anu, it is now apparent that by giving in to Spector you have practically allowed the destruction of AWADtalk. Most unfortunate. I have greatly enjoyed AWAD in general and this board in particular, and with the poisonous atmosphere generated by "Keiva" sure to return, and with the departure of most of the people with whom I enjoyed exchanging views, I can not see that it can hold any further attraction for me. Unlike some of our members, I can not blame you for taking the action you did; it must have been a very difficult choice to make. I take this opportunity to thank you and express my admiration for what you did in establishing AWAD.

In the event that "Keiva" decides that wreaking further havoc is unsatisfying and he takes himself off, please let me know by email, or by a prominent post on AWADtalk (I may just look in from time to time to see if he's gone yet). Then perhaps AWADtalk can recover, provided there is some way to keep "Keiva" out.

Posted By: wordcrazy Re: Why - 06/06/02 09:31 PM
This online community of wordlovers is bigger than any one person,
be it Keiva, Jackie, Anu, or anyone else. Let's not make this an
"either him or me" issue. Perhaps we can learn from English -- it accepts words
from all languages whether it's what some consider a "barbaric" tongue,
or a "refined" one. If we do not like a particular word, all we have
to do is ignore it, we do not need to tear out that page from the
dictionary. I do hope Jackie will be back as she has contributed
a lot and we all need her special love sprinkled on the board.


Anu, so sorry that I am a bit late in responding and saying my thanks to you. I have enjoyed this board, both as poster (before, a grandchild took a lot of my time) and as a reader (most of the time) of posts every night to unwind. I respect your integrity and will treasure this place as long as it is here. I hope to contribute more in the future.
There are still many of us who respect you and has not forgotten your vision for this place
Thank you.


Posted By: belMarduk Re: Why - 06/07/02 10:04 PM
..

Posted By: inselpeter Post deleted by inselpeter - 06/14/02 12:48 PM
Posted By: Keiva Re: Why - 06/14/02 02:13 PM
I feel it is destructive to air publicly any views relating to this

Then why did you? Destructive intent?

Posted By: PissandMoan Re: Why - 06/14/02 02:20 PM
Then why did you? Destructive intent?

Can you answer that for yourself, Keiva?
Why do you???????????????????????
Why, Why, Why is it so easy for you to accuse others of "destrucive intent" and not see your own?





Posted By: equalizer Re: Why - 06/14/02 02:50 PM
I feel it is destructive to air publicly any views relating to this

Then why did you? Destructive intent?

Kenny boy! You're back!! Am I glad to see you because I'd thought you were gone. But now you're back and I can have fun with you again!

But wait! Is that frustration I can sense from you again? What's your problem, Kenny? Why do you have so much frustration inside you? Is life so frustrating that you have to come here to vent your anger and wrath? Why is that, I wonder?

Problems at home? No? Oh, Kenny. It's not a problem in the bedroom, is it? Kenny can't quite perform? Mommy won't let daddy interface? So instead you come here to seem important (instead of staying at home and being impotent) and take it out on all the nice people here. What a shame. There are a lot of nice doctors who can help you with your physical and mental problems but they cost money, don't they? And this place is free. So you keep coming back here to make yourself feel better. But you don't do you? You just keep getting sicker and sicker and your stubborness prevents you from seeking some serious help. Well, too bad for you and too bad for all of us. Your sickness hinders us all but it doesn't need to, Kenny boy. Get some help and then come back here when you get better and we'll all be friends, won't we people?

If you don't get help then we'll just have to go on like this, won't we? And that's not a good idea. Oh, but maybe this frustration is the way that you 'perform'? Is this the only way you can get off, Kenny? Does it feel good after a heated argument? I bet it does. So you need this bitter pill to sustain you. You need to feel the pain of this forum to get a high, a rush and a thrill. To you this forum is like watching porn, isn't it? And it gives you your five minute thrill which you can't get elsewhere.

But that's enough for you in your empty life.

Posted By: inselpeter Re: Why - 06/14/02 02:50 PM
I've deleted what was intended to have been a private post. My apologies to the addressee.

I believe we have been contending with a malicious and self-replicating algorithm.

I will sorely miss most of you.

© Wordsmith.org