Wordsmith.org
Posted By: Keiva digressions (ex-hijack) - 08/26/01 05:22 PM
A recent thread (Q&A/to call the shots) got off track into a discussion of what-to-do-when-a-thread-gets-off-track.

This thread continues that subject of "digressions". A sampling of what was said on that subject, in the hijacked thread, is:

What about those of us who think they're BOTH boring?!
Then don't read it. That shouldn't stop those of us who don't think that. and Let those who find any topic boring either ignore it, or think of a better one.
[but it's only] after three or four clicks, and a couple of minutes total loading time, that the five or six new posts are all about ....

A scant summary -- but to the extent it omits anything crucial in the prior posts, they can be reposted below.


Posted By: wwh Re: digressions (ex-hijack) - 08/26/01 05:57 PM
The only time I am unhappy with digressions is when a post I thought was mildly clever gets hijacked by someone with a change of thread by someone with a better idea. Many times the digressions are more fun than the original thread.

Posted By: tsuwm Re: digressions - 08/26/01 06:39 PM
okay, most of us (perhaps even all) can agree that politics and religion should be, if not left to another time and place, diverted to separate threads. maybe sports too, but I wouldn't lump sports with the other two -- maybe group it with (treading lightly here) quilting or the like.

but to try to make more rules than that about digressions (remember the discussions we've had about rules??) seems pointless. trying to be a.c. (apolitically correct) all of the time would stifle most everything. think how we've alienated diabetics with our food digressions. and the hard of hearing with musickal digressions. and the lovelorn with.... and so it goes. some of our digressions are so tasteless that they actually *do get ignored. (chiromancy anyone?)

I think the best notion to date is the one which suggested we MAKE BETTER USE OF THE SUBJECT BOX. but we're probably in too much of a hurry to post that next clever digression....

Posted By: belligerentyouth digression intensions - 08/27/01 08:33 AM
>MAKE BETTER USE OF THE SUBJECT BOX

Agreed. If many unrelated ideas are floating about in a single thread, then it is courteous, if not imperative to indicate your posts emphasis in the subject line.
As for digression in general - it's just natural. No one (I hope) expects a thread to have to take a certain path, so who's to complain when it winds its merry-morphing way.
That would be like taking a mystery tour, then complaining about not visiting a particular place! :-)

Posted By: WhitmanO'Neill Re: digression intensions - 08/27/01 01:15 PM
I don't think we can define what is boring, as that is an abstraction that varies with everyone's taste. And I think to limit our spontaneity to avoid being boring just strait-jackets our freedom of expression, inhibits our postings with a bit of paranoia about "digressing too much," and ultimately (and ironically) guarantees the board will become austere and boring in a more general way. But USING THE SUBJECT LINE for departures from the main topic-flow is certainly the best, and most courteous, remedy to alert folks to posts of disinterest, and to avoid confusion. And especially it is less confusing for new folks...I remember the Neanderthal thread I first posted when I was a stranger suddenly took a turn to a discussion of ümlauts/dieresis that, even with subject headings, left me somewhat lost and confused as to what was happening until I got the hang of the motion here. And even though it kind of fit the general discussion of German etymology and linguistics, and wasn't a huge leap, it still caught me offguard. I recall one recent stranger's thread where we totally lept off the subject...that must have been perplexing and frustrating. I don't think we've heard from that stranger again, truth be told. So heading subject departures should be a common practice. For instance, "ALIAS DIGRESSION", for those prone to that. but that's another story, I hope those complaining about wasting time aren't one and the same I thought of starting a BORING LIST thread on I & A so we could all list what bores us most so we could see how futile it would be to try to govern the board by such a criteria. But, honestly, I can't think of anything that bores me so much I wouldn't read for awhile to see if I could learn something from it, or just peruse it out of curiosity, but that's just me.

This wonderful Rupert Brooke poem, a favorite of mine, just happened to show up as the Poem-of-the-Day in my mailbox today. I thought it ironically timely and fitting to the discussion-at-large (especially the closing couplet, which I often quote), so here it is:

Poem: Heaven
By: Rupert Brooke
Comments or Suggestions? emule@emule.com
**************************************************
Fish (fly-replete, in depth of June,
Dawdling away their wat'ry noon)
Ponder deep wisdom, dark or clear,
Each secret fishy hope or fear.
Fish say, they have their Stream and Pond;
But is there anything Beyond?
This life cannot be All, they swear,
For how unpleasant, if it were!
One may not doubt that, somehow, Good
Shall come of Water and of Mud;
And, sure, the reverent eye must see
A Purpose in Liquidity.
We darkly know, by Faith we cry,
The future is not Wholly Dry.
Mud unto mud! -- Death eddies near --
Not here the appointed End, not here!
But somewhere, beyond Space and Time.
Is wetter water, slimier slime!
And there (they trust) there swimmeth One
Who swam ere rivers were begun,
Immense, of fishy form and mind,
Squamous, omnipotent, and kind;
And under that Almighty Fin,
The littlest fish may enter in.
Oh! never fly conceals a hook,
Fish say, in the Eternal Brook,
But more than mundane weeds are there,
And mud, celestially fair;
Fat caterpillars drift around,
And Paradisal grubs are found;
Unfading moths, immortal flies,
And the worm that never dies.
And in that Heaven of all their wish,
There shall be no more land, say fish.

Posted By: Jackie Nothing but digressions - 08/27/01 03:19 PM
"...merry-morphing way..." B-y, I love that! So here I go,
in my "merry, merry morphing way" [music notes icon]. (Sorry, but it just made me think of the song!)
==========================================================

Dearest WO'N, you have quoted my beloved! That's one of his South Seas poems. While looking for that one, I came across this one, listed as an experiment, and of course had to post it--oh, it...it...oh, read for yourself.

Choriambics I

Ah! not now, when desire burns, and the wind calls, and
the suns of spring
Light-foot dance in the woods, whisper of life, woo me
to wayfaring;
Ah! not now should you come, now when the road
beckons, and good friends call,
Where are songs to be sung, fights to be fought, yea! and
the best of all,
Love, on myriad lips fairer than yours, kisses you could
not give! . . .
Dearest, why should I mourn, whimper, and whine, I
that have yet to live?
Sorrow will I forget, tears for the best, love on the lips
of you,
Now, when dawn in the blood wakes, and the sun laughs
up the eastern blue;
I'll forget and be glad!
Only at length, dear, when the great day ends,
When love dies with the last light, and the last song has
been sung, and friends
All are perished, and gloom strides on the heaven: then,
as alone I lie,
'Mid Death's gathering winds, frightened and dumb, sick
for the past, may I
Feel you suddenly there, cool at my brow; then may I
hear the peace
Of your voice at the last, whispering love, calling,
ere all can cease
In the silence of death; then may I see dimly, and know,
a space,
Bending over me, last light in the dark, once, as of old,
your face.



Posted By: maverick Re: Nothing but digressions - 08/27/01 04:31 PM
I love the poetic digressions! but going back to the topic that started the debate:

I wouldn't lump sports with the other two

Well, I would, or even worse, tsuwm, and for this simple reason. Whenever 3 or more men get together in a bar anywhere around the world, they talk about sports. It follows that these converstions are available to me and others almost anywhere we care to look.

I come here for something different. The specific topics (complete with digressions down the byways of personal experience) are not so important to me. All I am fundamentally interested in is an intelligent conversation with others of differing backgrounds and experiences, and which is why I love this unique space.

So that is why I think it is worth at least taking note of our occasional slides to what I believe is the lowest common denominator of discourse - recipes for the girls, sports for the boys. We can do better.

Posted By: Faldage Re: Nothing but digressions - 08/27/01 04:36 PM
recipes for the girls, sports for the boys. We can do better.

I agree.

Ready for my Ludicranian Toast recipe?

Posted By: maverick Re: Nothing but digressions - 08/27/01 04:39 PM
mmmm, swop you my tripe a la mode...?

Posted By: tsuwm Re: girls and boys - 08/27/01 04:41 PM
yes, that is exactly where sports belong... with recipes. (I plugged in 'quilting' simply to avoid bringing up food :) real fights develop over politics and religion. (soccer brawls notwithstanding -- either they're also pandr-based, or merely hooliganism)

Posted By: Faldage Re: Nothing but digressions - 08/27/01 04:43 PM
tripe a la mode

Yum. Meet me in the Male Recipe Swapping forum.

Posted By: maverick Re: Nothing but digressions - 08/27/01 04:48 PM
er, remind me, is that under Animal Behaviour?

Posted By: Faldage Re: Nothing but digressions - 08/27/01 04:50 PM
Animal Behaviour?

Weakly Dreams

Posted By: tsuwm Re: We can do better. - 08/27/01 04:52 PM


Posted By: maverick Re: Nothing but digressions - 08/27/01 04:53 PM
Weakly Dreams

Are we onto the *other topic now?

Posted By: wwh Re: Nothing but digressions - 08/27/01 04:53 PM
If apple pie ala mode means topped with ice cream, is tripe ala mode likewise topped? Reminds me of nerd of all nerds in Leverett House who used to order grapefruit topped with chocolate icecream, just to attract attention, he was that lonesome.

Posted By: Faldage Aw, gee, Dad. - 08/27/01 04:55 PM
We're just trying to have fun.

Posted By: maverick Re: Aw, gee, Dad. - 08/27/01 04:56 PM
'sides, with this many digressions, it's gotta be a record for staying on topic!

Posted By: Faldage Re: Nothing but digressions - 08/27/01 05:01 PM
If apple pie ala mode means topped with ice cream, is tripe ala mode likewise topped?

Of course we all know that a la mode simply means in the fashion but it seems the only way USns use it is to signify topped with ice cream. Do we have any other a la mode dishes that aren't topped with ice cream?

Posted By: maverick Re: Nothing but digressions - 08/27/01 05:09 PM
Yep – Yart a la mode is a local delicacy, which is served with a cherry on top

http://wordsmith.org/board/showflat.pl?Cat=&Board=words&Number=29511


Posted By: inselpeter Re: digression intensions - 08/27/01 05:36 PM
Digressions will be entirely avoided if all threads are begun with their final post.

Belligerent: Karl Valentine made excellent use of this technique when purchasing tickets at the Munich rail terminal.

Posted By: wwh Re: digression intensions - 08/27/01 05:46 PM
"Yep – Yart a la mode is a local delicacy, which is served with a cherry on top "

The waitress said she didn't have a cherry, but did still have the box it came in.

Posted By: Faldage Re: The Unanswered YART - 08/27/01 05:54 PM
Unanswered there. And here?

At least I found out where the tripe came from. Would that be Herb Caen, the late lamented SF columnist?

Posted By: francais31415 Re: digression intensions - 08/27/01 08:05 PM
Yes, I think using the subject box will help. However, I don't feel we need stay strictly on the subject of the original post (the one that started the thread), as long as we don't stray too far.

Posted By: TEd Remington Re: Nothing but digressions - 08/28/01 04:46 PM
>Do we have any other a la mode dishes

Well, there's Texas stew and ... OH. A la mode, not Alamo.

Ted goes off to rent from a different car company.

Posted By: Capital Kiwi Re: Nothing but digressions - 08/28/01 09:38 PM
Faldage fulminates: Yum. Meet me in the Male Recipe Swapping forum.

I must say, I cringe when I see suggestions that there are recipes for males. Something along the lines of the "sugar and spice and all things nice" which girls used to be made of before they threw that recipe away, perhaps?

Posted By: Jazzoctopus Re: Nothing but digressions - 08/28/01 09:57 PM
I cringe when I see suggestions that there are recipes for males.

Yet, outside of Julia Child, most cooking shows are with males: Emeril, that cajun guy, the Iron Chef.

Posted By: Capital Kiwi Re: Nothing but digressions - 08/28/01 10:25 PM
No, no, JazzO, you misunderstand me (or are wilfully pulling my leg): I meant recipes for making males!

Posted By: of troy Re: Nothing but digressions - 08/28/01 10:38 PM
wasn't that recipe "snips and snails, and puppy dog tails"

or is there an other recipe?

In the movie The Decline of the American Empire the opening sequence has a group of couples meeting for a big dinner/get together. The males are all off doing their thing and the females theirs, making dinner and working out at the gym, respectively.

Posted By: musick Post deleted by musick - 08/29/01 08:24 PM
Posted By: consuelo Re: Nothing but digressions - 08/29/01 08:32 PM
But of course! Some with nuts, some with raisins, some with whipping cream.....you get my drift.

Posted By: Capital Kiwi Re: Nothing but digressions - 08/29/01 08:56 PM
Do you mean there .. is more than one?

Keven, with GE there is an infinite number of ways. Come to think of it, even before GE, there were lots of ways. It's just that only one of them could be considered to be fun by most of us ....

Posted By: wwh Re: Nothing but digressions - 08/29/01 09:10 PM
Dear CK: and just think what the sex-change surgeons will be able to do with stem cells! (New meaning of "stem")

Posted By: musick Post deleted by musick - 08/29/01 09:27 PM
Posted By: Capital Kiwi Re: ...but digressions - 08/30/01 02:12 PM
Cap-K... "GE" as is "bringing good things to life®".

Hmmm...what are they putting in the water in Shytown these days?


Posted By: Keiva Re: ...but digressions - 08/30/01 07:44 PM
what are they putting in the water in Shytown these days?
Musick, could you please let me know where I, as a fellow-Shytonian, can get some of dat der water?

Posted By: musick Post deleted by musick - 08/30/01 11:16 PM
Posted By: Keiva Re: Nothing but digressions - 08/30/01 11:53 PM
wasn't that recipe "snips and snails, and puppy dog tails"
Or is it snakes and snails (they don't become snips until they're older)?


Posted By: Keiva Re: Nothin' but... - 08/31/01 12:26 AM
In "your case", don't we call it "Schytownlandian"?
Yes -- but if the water by you is as fine as appears, I anticipate moving!


© Wordsmith.org