Wordsmith.org
Posted By: Zed Impatriated - 08/21/03 03:45 PM
vbq wrote that my name, Zed (the Canadian pronounciation of the last letter of the alphabet) impatriated me. A combination of imprint and patriate. I liked the concept so I thought I'd share it.

Posted By: Buffalo Shrdlu Re: Impatriated - 08/21/03 03:53 PM
have you recently moved to Canada?

Posted By: Bean Re: Impatriated - 08/21/03 04:19 PM
It almost sounds a bit serious, like implicated. You generally don't want to be implicated in connection with a crime.

Also, based on the name, you could have been British. FWIW.

Posted By: AnnaStrophic Re: Impatriated - 08/21/03 04:55 PM
Also, based on the name, you could have been British

... or even [gasp!] Zildian!

Posted By: Zed Re: Impatriated - 08/21/03 10:11 PM
re could have been British or Zildian. Agreed but around here (N Amer) it is a quick way to tell Canuck vs Yank. There are other ways of course, ruf vs rooof on your house, etc .
As for just moving here I was born here just (hrmphmumblmumble) years ago.

Posted By: maverick Re: Impatriated - 08/21/03 10:12 PM
... or even [gasp!] Zildian!

nah, that'ud be zid!

Posted By: sjmaxq Re: Impatriated - 08/21/03 10:28 PM
>zid.

Nope, it's Zuld, the land of fush and chups. We're non-rhotic, not non-ellic.

Posted By: maverick Re: Impatriated - 08/21/03 10:31 PM
ah, so true - my brain must have been dallying in Suth Efrica or something: please accept craven apologies for the foul slur! btw, it occurred to me recently that this feature of Zildian could well owe a lot to the Scottish influence - what do you reckon?

Posted By: Zed Re: Impatriated - 08/21/03 10:35 PM
So do the zed'ers outnumber the zee'ers? Canucks are so used to being outnumbered that we outside the neighbourhood.

Posted By: Faldage Re: Impatriated - 08/22/03 12:06 AM
around here (N Amer)

But here isn't N Amer. It's everywhere.

On the internet nobody knows you're a dog

Posted By: sjmaxq Re: Impatriated - 08/22/03 12:31 AM
>So do the zed'ers outnumber the zee'ers?

Depends how you count. The number of nations where zed is standard is greater than the number of nations where zee is standard(afaik, only one "English as first language" country uses "zee"). However, that one one nation has more English speakers than the others put together.

Posted By: Buffalo Shrdlu Re: Impatriated - 08/22/03 01:07 AM
all this alphabetification aside, I don't think the word fits anyway.

Posted By: maverick Re: Impatriated - 08/22/03 10:35 PM
Agreed, et. Your first comment stands. Strange, though - the word got me thinking this is (almost) another of those constructions in which the root form is friendless - has anyone actually read a document using the verb to patriate? Repatriate, expatriate, surebut®...

and in the only online dictionary ref I saw (from an admittedly cursory look), guess which is one of the countries to recognise this word patriate as of useful service?!

http://www.infoplease.com/ipd/A0580359.html

Posted By: Faldage Re: Impatriated - 08/23/03 10:32 AM
B&M OED lists impatriotic. It means not patriotic.

Posted By: sjmaxq Re: Impatriated - 08/23/03 11:12 AM
> impatriotic.

I like it. Would you say that's relation to unpatriotic is akin to the relationship between amoral and immoral? I would much rather describe myself as passionately impatriotic, if I understand its meaning correctly.

Posted By: Faldage Re: Impatriotic - 08/23/03 11:24 AM
akin to the relationship between amoral and immoral?

I didn't get that feeling from OED, but I like it, too.

Count me in.

Posted By: tsuwm Re: Impatriotic - 08/23/03 12:10 PM
Obs. rare.

Not patriotic; unpatriotic. So impatriotism, want of patriotism.

1805 W. TAYLOR in Ann. Rev. III. 281 Nothing of impiety, but only of impatriotism. Ibid. 317 Every thing..which infringes on our cosmopolitical duty is really impatriotic.


although it appears that this word belonged exclusively to W. Taylor (R.I.P.), someone out there may be renewing the ®. why not just coin "apatriotic"?

(aptually®, apatriotic gets 150 Googles®; most of them are clearly typos, but here's something apropos from Groups:
The people who try to *keep* people from expressing their opinions are unpatriotic, while the sheep who have no opinion are apatriotic. :)
)

Posted By: Faldage Re: Impatriotic - 08/23/03 12:32 PM
www.impatriotic.com purports to sell First and Second Run decks of the infamous "Most Wanted" deck of cards.

This site (http://www.vanguardngr.com/articles/2002/niger_delta/nd128032003.html) uses the word. Perhaps one could suss out the meaning from the context.

Posted By: tsuwm Re: Impatriotic - 08/23/03 12:51 PM
>www.impatriotic.com

it appears that www.unpatriotic.com was already taken; and there seems to be a claim in for www.apatriotic.com -- let's hope they get it right!

Posted By: Zed Re: Impatriotic - 08/25/03 07:30 PM
Well I'm definitely not un- or a-patriotic so darn there goes another good word uncoined.

Posted By: Bean Re: Impatriated - 08/26/03 02:25 PM
and in the only online dictionary ref I saw (from an admittedly cursory look), guess which is one of the countries to recognise this word patriate as of useful service?!

That's because we did it, in 1982, we patriated our Constitution (brought it under our own control) so we no longer have to go begging to your House O' Lords to make changes to our Constitution.

Posted By: Faldage Re: Impatriated - 08/26/03 02:32 PM
no longer have to go begging to your House O' Lords to make changes to our Constitution.

When in the Course of human Events…

Posted By: Bean Re: Impatriated - 08/26/03 04:12 PM
Yah, well, we do things differently up here. Polite conversation instead of bloody revolution, that sort of thing...

Posted By: Faldage Re: Impatriated - 08/26/03 04:25 PM
We woulda been happy to walk away quietly. But, no!

Posted By: maverick Re: Impatriated - 08/26/03 09:57 PM
begging to your House O' Lords to make changes to our Constitution

Shaddup, yah moaning minnies - at least y'all have got a constitution!

On the other hand, our supreme court authority doesn't appoint the chief executive by fiat!

Posted By: sjmaxq Re: Impatriated - 08/26/03 10:35 PM
Well, we don't have a constitution, just a Bill of Rights, and if every statute was written the way our Bill of Rights is, lawyers would be nearly redundant.

© Wordsmith.org