Wordsmith.org
Posted By: tsuwm double entendre - 02/27/02 03:11 PM
this phrase has shown up in two threads over the past couple of days, which prompts this comment/question: most dictionaries give the etymology of double entendre as an obsolete French phrase which translates as "double meaning", but in English usually implies that one meaning is indelicate.
I was surprised to discover in the OED that the original (obsolete) French phrase was double entente.

Why the change of words, and is neither expression extant in modern French?

Posted By: wwh Re: double entendre - 02/27/02 03:21 PM
Dear tsuwm: double meanings often occur unintentionally. They are very common as a form of irony. Ribaldry is more permissible when not explicit.And everybody has to get into the act and change things, as you have pointed out to me.

Posted By: Capital Kiwi Re: double entendre - 02/27/02 03:31 PM
Neither rendition is in my fancy new French dictionary . Should I take it back?

Posted By: Rubrick Is this a double entendre? - 02/27/02 03:38 PM
Reminds me of a groaner

"Have you ever had deja vu?
Nope. I don't eat French food. It keeps repeating on me.


Posted By: tsuwm Re: double entendre - 02/27/02 04:02 PM
dear bill, just so; but that wasn't my question. why the change from entente to entendre?


Posted By: wwh Re: Is this a double entendre? - 02/27/02 04:03 PM
By the by,my friend Michael Vickers of Oxford has been working on Aristophanes
for several years now, and has written dazu: he believes Aristophanes is
*far* more obscene in his double-entendres than we have even guessed so
far. Guess what? He can't find a publisher for his work....The more things
change,....

I'd like to see some samples.

A number of sites include double entendres as a form of sexual harassment. So beware.

Posted By: Keiva Re: Is this a double entendre? - 02/27/02 04:30 PM
Aristophanes loses quite a bit in translation. His plays becomes incredibly hilarious if one reads (say) three translations simultaneously, picking the best from each.

I'd like to see some samples.
"Some lovefeast! The only thing getting laid here is the table." -- Lysistrata
[further suitable only for PM]
Posted By: wwh Re:Entente - 02/27/02 05:22 PM
Dear tsuwm: the only "entente" I remember is the Entente Cordiale that checked the Kaiser in early 1900's, until he built up his navy enough to feel able to risk war:

Agadir 1911

Double Entendre (English-French for Un mot à double
entente, or à deux ententes).

Words which secretly express a rude or coarse covert meaning, generally of a licentious character.
“Entendre” is the infinitive mood of a verb, and is never used as a noun.

I think that "entendre" means to understand, and I think that "entente" means agreement.

Not one to give up easily, Kaiser Wilhelm sends a warship to the Moroccan town
of Agadir in 1911 to "subtly" show German presence. This time, however, he
comes face to face with the Entente Cordiale, who put enough pressure on the
Kaiser to make him back out of Morocco completely.


Posted By: Capital Kiwi Re:Entente - 02/27/02 05:36 PM
Yes Bill, the tawdry cycle of gunboat diplomacy reached its zenith at Agadir. Of course, one of the first examples was Commodore Perry sailing into Tokyo Bay!

Posted By: wwh Re:Entente - 02/27/02 06:43 PM
Now tell me where he learned the trick!

Posted By: Max Quordlepleen . - 02/27/02 07:20 PM
Posted By: Jackie Re: double entendre - 02/27/02 09:07 PM
Interesting, tsuwm. It looks as though the French use entente. I found the following in "Dictionnaire Universel Francophone © 1997 HACHETTE/EDICEF pour les bases de données dictionnairiques et la version réseau. - © 1997 AUPELF-UREF pour les ajouts scientifiques et l'adaptation lexicographique des bases. - © 1997 Claude Poirier pour la base lexicographique "Amérique du Nord"." Unfortunately, it doesn't give an etymology.
entente n. f.

1. Mot, phrase à double entente, que l'on peut comprendre, interpréter de deux façons.
Note: all real French speakers, please correct my interpretations as needed! This means: Word, phrase ...that can be understood, interpreted in two ways.
======================================================
entendre v. tr.

I. 1. Litt. Percevoir le sens de, saisir par l'intelligence, comprendre.
Literally, to perceive the sense of, to know by intelligence, to understand. Nowhere under this word did the dictionary use the phrase double entendre.
=====================================================
Here's something interesting--I don't think the last line really needs translating.
Thresor de la langue française (1606)
entente (236)
Mettre toute son entente, Acriter animum intendere.

Mettre son entente à fouyr puis, Conferre animum ad fodiendos puteos.

Respondre à deux ententes, Perplexe respondere, Respondere suspensa et ambigua, et vtroque flexibilia, B.

This Dictionary of Other Times had no mention of double entendre.
http://www.lib.uchicago.edu/efts/ARTFL/projects/dicos/



Posted By: Anonymous Re: double entendre - 02/27/02 10:46 PM
Wow, thanks for that, J! =)

does your dictionary by chance include "equivoque"? that word sounds to me like it might a "real" french word.

as an aside, another term to describe a dilogical statement is "amphibolous". i just like the way it sounds.
Posted By: stales re: "amphibolous" - 02/28/02 02:55 AM
An amphibole is a family of dark coloured (dark green to black), iron and/or magnesium rich minerals. Obviously the words have the same root (?)

Please let me in on why........(showing my monoglottedness......)

stales

Posted By: wwh Re: re: "amphibolous" - 02/28/02 03:45 AM
Monarchs are amphibolous, because they've got two. Monorchs are one shy.

Posted By: Rubrick Re: Is this a double entendre? - 02/28/02 10:46 AM
A number of sites include double entendres as a form of sexual harassment. So beware.

Both ways, I presume. Some of the women I work with can be wicked.

Posted By: Jackie Re: double entendre - 02/28/02 03:42 PM
Thank you, Caradea--I love to learn things so painlessly! Again, no trans. needed. Oh--plusieurs is several.


équivoque adj. et n. f.

I. adj. 1. Susceptible de plusieurs interprétations. Comportement équivoque. Termes équivoques. 2. Péjor. Qui n'inspire pas confiance. Réputation, allure équivoque. Syn. louche, suspect. II. n. f. Expression, situation laissant dans l'incertitude. Parler, agir sans équivoque. Syn. ambiguïté.




Posted By: Rubrick Re: double entendre - 02/28/02 03:52 PM
équivoque adj. et n. f.

I. adj. 1. Susceptible de plusieurs interprétations. Comportement équivoque. Termes équivoques. 2. Péjor. Qui n'inspire pas confiance. Réputation, allure équivoque. Syn. louche, suspect. II. n. f. Expression, situation
laissant dans l'incertitude. Parler, agir sans équivoque. Syn. ambiguïté.


Ah, louche.

This was the word of the day way back on July 16th last year.

louche (loosh) adjective

Of questionable character; dubious; disreputable.

[From French louche, cross-eyed, from Old French lousche, feminine of lois,
from Latin lusca, feminine of luscus, one-eyed.]


Would perjury have emanated from the French word Péjor?

Posted By: boronia Re: double entendre - 02/28/02 04:03 PM
I believe that 'Pejor.' in the definition is just a label for 'pejorative use', not a word itself

Posted By: wofahulicodoc worse and worse - 02/28/02 04:07 PM
Pejor...just a label for 'pejorative use', not a word itself

Not so sure about that. I never learned the word in French class, but in Spanish there is "pejor" (worse), the antonym of "mejor" (better), and it wouldn't surprise me to find out that there is a similar word in French with a common Latin root in all three languages.

Posted By: wwh Re: worse and worse - 02/28/02 04:48 PM
Latin malus=bad, peior=worse,pessimus=worst

Posted By: tsuwm Re: worse and worse - 02/28/02 05:59 PM
Pejor...just a label for 'pejorative use', not a word itself
> Not so sure about that... it wouldn't surprise me to find out that there is a similar word in
French.

there may well be, but I'm betting with boronia on this -- it looks like an abbreviation for the F. equivalent of "pejorative sense".



Posted By: RhubarbCommando Re: worse and worse - 02/28/02 08:00 PM
I had assumed, along with boronia, from its context that that was the meaning of Pejor.

And on consulting my "dictionaire" I find: pejorati-f -ve (adj) pejorative

Posted By: boronia Re: worse and worse - 02/28/02 08:22 PM
not trying to be ultra-picky, but I'm guessing that you consulted your dictionnaire (2 n's) :-)

Posted By: RhubarbCommando Re: worse and worse - 02/28/02 08:33 PM
Sorry - can't afford 2 ns - it ain't chicken feed, you know!

Posted By: boronia Re: worse and worse - 02/28/02 08:34 PM
now, now

or - if I, too, cry poverty, would that be: ow, ow!?!?

Posted By: Keiva Re: worse and worse - 02/28/02 08:36 PM
Sorry - can't afford 2 n's

But Rhuby, this whole thread is about double-n tendering.

Posted By: consuelo peor tantito - 02/28/02 09:05 PM
Ackshully©, the Spanish is peor, not pejor. It comes from the latin, pejor. Mejor is the correct spelling for better/best in Spanish, latin melior and is the antonym of peor.

Posted By: wofahulicodoc tant pis - 02/28/02 10:29 PM
Thanks - I stand corrected. And learned something today

Posted By: Rubrick Re: double entendre - 03/01/02 11:05 AM
I believe that 'Pejor.' in the definition is just a label for 'pejorative use', not a word itself

Le Whoops©! Mon faux! [emoticon embarasée]

Posted By: Keiva Re: worse and worse - 03/01/02 05:49 PM
RhubarbCommando: Sorry - can't afford 2 n's

Rhuby, just contact Rubrick. He's our Master of Dubl i n. [/emoticon embarasée]


[oh, HOW could I have missed this before? -e]

Posted By: belMarduk Re: double entendre / double entente - 03/02/02 05:59 PM
The expression is still A double entente in French.

I'd think the word would have been changed to entendre in English because entendre means "to hear" and you hear two different meanings in a double entendre. An English person would think that double entente would not make sense because the primary definition of the word is agreement but it is also in the same family as entendre just like entendu.

Posted By: belMarduk Re: équivoque - 03/02/02 06:07 PM
Oddly, équivoque is seldom used alone. It is generally preceded by SANS to mean something is completely clear and has only one meaning - C'est un phrase sans équivoque.

It is also used when a person wants to say he is not waffling on an issue... Je suis sans équivoque à propos des clowns qui se promènent avec des balounes.

Posted By: consuelo Re: équivoque - 03/02/02 10:27 PM
In Spanish, the verb equivocar means to be mistaken, to be in error, to get something wrong. The adjective, equivoco(a) from the latin aequivocus, means ambiguous, much like double entendre.

© Wordsmith.org