Wordsmith.org
Posted By: Sparteye Have we met before? - 06/26/01 12:44 PM
Because you seem familiar....

Today's buzzwhack term is

SUBJECT CREEP: The tendency for an e-mail list or
newsgroup discussion to veer wildly off topic
while the subject line remains the same.


for more: http://www.buzzwhack.com

Naw - we'd never do that.



Posted By: tsuwm Re: Have we met before? - 06/26/01 12:49 PM
we are Past Masters at subcreep®.

Posted By: of troy Re: Have we met before? - 06/26/01 12:57 PM
Well according to the chaos theory, the most exciting things, the chance for the most creativity is in the realm of chaos..

So it seems only natural that when you bring together a number of creative people, you are at risk of entering the realm of chaos. All things considered, I think we manage to avoid complete chaos.. But have just enough to make things interesting...

Posted By: maverick Re: Have we met before? - 06/26/01 02:54 PM
complete chaos

...so to keep it moving sideways, can you actually have a realm of chaos? Who would rule? Would there be elections? Who would guard the gates [mumblemumble]

Posted By: tsuwm Re: Have we met before? - 06/26/01 03:04 PM
>can you actually have a realm of chaos?

isn't that, more-or-less, the definition of anarchy?

Posted By: Faldage Re: Have we met before? - 06/26/01 03:08 PM
a realm of chaos


the definition of anarchy

Ruled by the Grand Anarch*, of course.

*Whose slightest whim is Public Agreement®


Posted By: of troy Re: Have we met before? - 06/26/01 08:04 PM
Oh- no not at all! Anarchy is a state with out government or ruling body –which can either be a utopia or lawless political disorder..

but chaos– the state of thing in which chance is supreme. The strange thing about chaos–it that it can contain order.. Just as if you flip a penny, you have a 50/50 chance of heads or tails... and if it is flipped 10 times, and each times comes up heads.. You still have a 50/50 chance at heads on the next flip–

if you flip long enough, the 50/50 pattern will be more evident.(and you are likely to get heads 50% of the time..) The large the number of flips, the more likely this is.. . But the flip a coin.. And it's chaos.. Chance is supreme. This is a particular freedom that anarchy does not promise.

the difference I suppose is subtle.. But to me its huge..

the ruling hierarchy on the board is anarchy– and while it is not a utopia, we are all pretty civil, and self governing – with out to much self censoring. (The gutter police – might say not enough self censoring.. But who are the gutter police? )

But AWAD also has chaos– any word tossed out.. Might be a spring board to a thousand other thoughts.. You can never tell which threads will go on and on for hundreds of post– changing subjects, weaving together ideas..going back to the original post.. And some thread start strong and in a few days.. drop out of site..


Posted By: tsuwm Re: Have we met before? - 06/26/01 08:20 PM
I was probably being too literal (as is my wont):

anarchy - political disorder and confusion
realm of chaos - a realm with the condition of great disorder or confusion
[per AHD]

Posted By: wwh Re: Have we met before? - 06/26/01 08:45 PM
All animals are created equal, but some are more equal than others. Anarchy, or oligarchy?

Posted By: Anonymous Re: Have we met before? - 06/26/01 09:00 PM
Anarchy, or oligarchy.

Neither. It's malarky. (Nice tie in to the other thread, though!)

Posted By: Brandon Re: Have we met flipped coins before? - 06/26/01 09:30 PM

Indeed, even after flipping heads a hundred times, the chance for another heads is only 50%. Unfortunately for Guildenstern, Rosencrantz had luck on his side.

Posted By: WhitmanO'Neill Re: Have we met before? - 06/26/01 09:57 PM
Chaos

Where's Maxwell Smart and Agent 99 when you need them? Would you believe...?

Posted By: jimthedog Re: Have we met before? - 06/26/01 10:10 PM
Would you believe...?
That they're right in the next room as I write?

They're on TVland at 5:00PM, 10:30 PM (I'm not sure about this one. It might be 10:00), and 2:00 AM, if you don't know.
edit I decided that it is, indeed, 10:30.
Posted By: belligerentyouth Chaos - 06/27/01 06:52 AM
Helen postulates:
Chance is supreme.

Doesn't anyone go for good ol' destiny nowadays?

Posted By: Jackie Re: Have we met before? - 06/27/01 03:56 PM
we are Past Masters at subcreep®.
But do we have prescriptive rights to it?






Posted By: musick Re: Have we met before? - 06/28/01 05:41 AM
....perscreeptive writes?

Posted By: wwh Re: Have we met before? - 06/28/01 02:02 PM
At this point I suggest last rites.

Posted By: Jackie Re: Have we met before? - 06/28/01 04:21 PM
"Last rites"--good one, Dr. Bill!

Sparteye, thanks for posting that link--I'm tickled to find a way to keep up on things.

Posted By: of troy Re: Have we met before? - 06/28/01 07:55 PM
but there exist the chance that this thread will go on and on...

Posted By: inselpeter Re: Have we met flipped coins before? - 06/30/01 11:29 AM
<<Unfortunately for Guildenstern, Rosencrantz had luck on his side.>>

Or heads on either.

Posted By: Capital Kiwi Re: Have we met flipped coins before? - 07/01/01 02:36 AM
Rosencrantz and Guildenstern - four people, you know (Fourth Form at St Michael's)

Posted By: musick Re: Have we met before? - 07/01/01 06:02 PM
St Michael? Isn't that in Minisoda.

anarchy-political disorder and confusion

Most that I have ever heard use the term have meant "no order at all" not "a jumbled order of available"... leave it to a dictionary to clarifie...

© Wordsmith.org