Wordsmith.org
Posted By: maverick All y'all feeling happy? - 06/15/01 03:02 PM
from The silicon.com Weekly Round-Up (thanx, John):

If you're sitting at your desk reading this and feeling rather unhappy, the chances are you're doing your job very well (and I'm doing mine very badly).

It seems that the less tickety-boo we feel in the office, the harder we work. Psychologists from the University of Alberta have found that chipper people waste time trying to maintain their happy moods, while their miserable brethren get on with the job.

The boffins studied four groups of people building circuit boards on a production line. The grumpy gits didn't work any faster, but they made half as many mistakes as the happy chappies.

One explanation is that miserable people use work to take their minds of their bad moods.

So welcome to the 21st century, where black is the new grey, cloudy is the new sunny and having a face like a wet weekend in Bognor means you're a well-oiled cog in the corporate wheel.

One question: were the psychologists happy in their jobs? If so, it's just possible they made a mistake...


Talking of mistakes, a few hundred web users took what was supposed to be a joke a tad too seriously. The owner of a Joke-a-Day website posted a spoof story warning people to delete the "insidious aol.exe virus which has already effected close to 30m computers". The file is of course the executable which boots up the AOL application.

Posted By: Brandon Re: You-all feeling happy? - 06/15/01 03:17 PM
The owner of a Joke-a-Day website posted a spoof story warning people to delete the "insidious aol.exe virus which has already effected close to 30m computers".

I feel much better now that I've rid myself of that aol.exe virus. I'm getting ready to blast that Iexplorer.exe virus, too.

Brandon

Posted By: tsuwm Re: You-all feeling happy? - 06/15/01 03:24 PM
"insidious aol.exe virus which has already effected close to 30m computers".

I had no idea that the america(!) on line (ha!) software was so effective!


Posted By: Faldage Re: You-all feeling happy? - 06/15/01 03:30 PM
30m computers

Is that thirty thousandths of a computer?

Posted By: Bean Re: You-all feeling happy? - 06/15/01 04:46 PM
I thought it was only the big computers, 30 m (98.43 ft) long!

Posted By: maverick Re: All y'all feeling happy? - 06/15/01 05:18 PM
and did you notice the sly way this works, this wicked viral worm - it creeps up on the computers (large and small) and effects them!

Posted By: tsuwm Re: All y'all feeling happy? - 06/15/01 05:55 PM
>and effects them!

::sigh::

Posted By: Faldage Re: All y'all feeling happy? - 06/15/01 06:10 PM
effects them

Maybe it has something to do with turning them into 30 meter computers.

Posted By: AnnaStrophic Re: All y'all feeling happy? - 06/15/01 07:58 PM
::sigh::

It's OK, tsuwm. *I saw you got there first.

Posted By: Hyla Re: All y'all feeling happy? - 06/15/01 08:46 PM
*I saw you got there first

As did I, but mav seemed so pleased to have spotted it. (Not that *I spotted it...)

Posted By: wow Re: Effect & affect - 06/16/01 03:42 PM
Another Rule-Of-Thumb from my media days ... works most of the time ...
Effect = result
Affect = influence
Sigh back atcha' tsuwm!

Posted By: NicholasW Re: Effect & affect - 06/18/01 10:46 AM
Another rule of thumb, possibly better because you don't have to think about shades of meaning, is

effect = noun
affect = verb

You seldom need to use the verb 'effect' (in fact you never need to, as 'cause' or 'stage' or some such clearer synonym is always at hand), and the noun 'affect' is so rare that I barely know what it means even when I think about it.

Posted By: maverick Re: Effect & affect - 06/18/01 11:33 AM
Respect to tsuwm, but don't get grumpy, gramps! I wasn't remarking on the effect/affect split, because that (I think) is not what has happened here. I would take any odds the happless hack has fallen into this affectation through groping for the alternative and more effective description: infected.

© Wordsmith.org