Wordsmith.org
Posted By: tsuwm wangary: results - 10/22/03 02:01 AM
wangary

a) soft and flabby; term used in butchery to express the condition of meat which will not get solid [Specimens of English Dialect (1778)]

b) [street slang] term of unknown origin used to refer to nondescript graffiti found on billboards and transit vehicles [ron obvious] Bingley, WO’N(!)

c) a boat for conveying provisions, tools, etc. – so called by Australian aborigines [Coffeebean]

d) a furnace consisting of a special hearth where molten glass is developed before shaping by glassblowers [Wordwind] bel, max, Coffebean, wofa

e) Australasian witchcraft; similar to Haitian voudou and Brazilian candomblé [origin unknown; possibly from an island creole] [Asp]

f) the building in which threshing is performed [consuelo] ASp

g) cheeky, impish. (from wang - cheek, molar) [sjmaxq] hev

h) off kilter, askew, missing the target (Australian, origin obscure) [Maverick] Jackie, consuelo

i) the study of blagging/getting something for nothing. to wangle, a wangler, wangary [dodyskin] Wordwind

j) penile phantasmagoria [WO’N] (an Ack! from Jackie)

k) a type of greatcoat worn by coach drivers [Bingley] Faldage, maverick

l) a slang term of Australian origin: "he's gone wangary" ie he has been driven mad by isolation after extended periods living alone in the Outback. In other countries refered to as "cabin fever" or "going bush". [Zed] etaoin, sandbar

m) a tree-dwelling kangaroo of Australia, with a lighter pelt than the boongary, with which it shares genetic lineage [etaoin]

n) a Medieval science, concerned with the search for perpetual motion (cf. alchemy, the search for a means to transmute base metals into gold) [wofa]

o) refers to a person who has an unconscionable amount of jaw movement. From the Old English Wang, meaning jaw. In modern English, it means someone who talks too much, to the annoyance of others. [hev] musick

p) a term used by the IT industry when referring to technology (machinery and wiring) that is needed to accomplish point-to-point data communications, but is owned by and subsequently outsourced from your ISP/local telecommunications company [musick] dodyskin

q) Appalachian dial., Topsy-turvy; cattywampus. Everthang's gone all wangary round about here since Jeb come back from that fancy school of hisn. [Faldage] Zed

many were chosen, but none was correct; Wordwind collected 3.5 votes and the hogmaster® collected 2 votes + the skunk.
the armil® award is shared by all of those (five!?) who made some sort of oz connection. this was actually (if I counted correctly) round 43.
Posted By: Bingley Re: hogwash®: wangary - 10/22/03 02:19 AM
b

Bingley
Posted By: Faldage Re: hogwash®: wangary - 10/22/03 10:57 AM
k 'K?

Posted By: AnnaStrophic Re: hogwash®: wangary - 10/22/03 12:17 PM
f

Posted By: musick Re: hogwash®: wangary - 10/22/03 12:21 PM
O m'g*d.

Posted By: Jackie Re: hogwash®: wangary - 10/22/03 01:28 PM
h. (j = ! Ack.)

Posted By: Wordwind Re: hogwash®: wangary - 10/22/03 07:51 PM
i's have it.

Posted By: Buffalo Shrdlu Re: hogwash®: wangary - 10/22/03 07:56 PM
go to L...

Posted By: hev Re: hogwash®: wangary - 10/23/03 12:52 AM
Gee, I think I'll go for g.

Posted By: sandbar273 Re: hogwash®: wangary - 10/23/03 04:13 AM
I'll go for L

Posted By: consuelo Re: hogwash®: wangary - 10/23/03 04:18 AM
Heck, they all sound good, almost

Posted By: belMarduk Re: hogwash®: wangary - 10/23/03 02:52 PM
d for me

Posted By: dodyskin Re: hogwash®: wangary - 10/23/03 03:00 PM
I'll have a P please Bob.

Posted By: sjmaxq Re: hogwash®: wangary - 10/23/03 07:46 PM
C'est D pour moi, aussi. (All those Auusie ones just seem too plausible.)

Posted By: tsuwm Re: hogwash®: wangary - 10/24/03 02:35 PM
10 out of 15 reporting.. where are you mav, wofa, C-bean, Zed and WO'N...

Posted By: belMarduk Re: hogwash®: wangary - 10/24/03 05:29 PM
Hey Max, you Frenchy you, you can come and sit on my side of the table (wink-wink, nudge-nuge)

Posted By: Coffeebean Re: hogwash®: wangary - 10/24/03 09:47 PM
D looks hot....

Posted By: Zed Re: hogwash®: wangary - 10/24/03 11:21 PM
I'm going to Q up.

Posted By: maverick Re: hogwash®: wangary - 10/25/03 10:53 PM
OK, I'll take a punt.

Posted By: wofahulicodoc Contrariwise - 10/25/03 11:38 PM
Hrumph.

Don't like any of 'em. Not even my own.

Too much Australia for any of them to be right.

Guess I'll take D, and then we'll have a nice 4-D tesseract made out of all that molten glass.

Posted By: WhitmanO'Neill Re: Contrariwise - 10/26/03 04:01 AM
I voting for whichever deffy tsuwm picks for me....Hogmaster?...which do you bequeath upon me?

Now I guess we'll need a "steenkin' roolz rooling" on this, uh, new wrinkle, ay?

Posted By: tsuwm Re: Contrariwise - 10/26/03 05:37 AM
would surrogate Juan stoop so low as to vote for ron's entry?! would he really <b>b</b> that obvious??

well, I won't do it.. instead I'll pass the Baton to ron his ownself.
Posted By: ron obvious Re: Contrariwise - 10/26/03 05:42 AM
I vote for B in WO'N's stead.

Posted By: tsuwm and the anwer is... - 10/26/03 05:45 AM
btw, the hogmaster scores the skunk, as no one selected a!

Posted By: WhitmanO'Neill Re: Contrariwise - 10/26/03 02:01 PM
So B it.

Posted By: tsuwm Re: wangary: results - 10/28/03 01:42 PM
in a futile fit of bandwidth preservation, I overwrote the quiz with the results, up top.
- joe hogbreth

Posted By: Bingley Re: wangary: results - 10/28/03 02:06 PM
My apologies to coffeebean, whose definition I was actually aiming for.

There is a chain of coffee shops here called Coffee Bean & Tea Leaf, originating from Singapore, I believe. It has excellent cakes and salads. A favourite hangout among the cognoscenti. Much better than that Seattle establishment.

Bingley
Posted By: AnnaStrophic Re: wangary: results - 10/28/03 02:09 PM
Indeed, tsuwm.
I admit some sort of psychological obstacle to the concept of meat in a liquid or gaseous state.

Posted By: tsuwm Re: wangary: results - 10/28/03 02:46 PM
>My apologies to coffeebean, whose definition I was actually aiming for.

the WO'N giveth and Bingley taketh away. :(

Posted By: Wordwind Re: wangary: results - 10/28/03 05:21 PM
Why did I collect 3.5 and not 4.0 votes? Not that I mind, but I do and I don't feel like reading all those voters and votees and figuring it out on my own. Easier to palaver here and ask the question and hope that tsuwm will reply.

By the way, tsuwm, thank you for offering us another cycle of wash.

Posted By: tsuwm Re: wangary: results - 10/28/03 05:42 PM
3.5: bel voted for you but didn't play; that's 3 full votes and a half vote, whatever points the votes are worth. I'm not sure if we arrived at a scoring consensus, but I think we're still trying to encourage participation. |shrug|

p.s. - I put the non-playing voters in italics up above, but then didn't bother to explain myself. |burp|
Posted By: WhitmanO'Neill Re: wangary: results - 10/29/03 02:59 AM
Actually³, O Hogmasterbrether, I didn't really think you would stoop low enough to award *yourself my vote. [rolleyes-e]

To B or not to B was obviously not the question, huh, ron? Shame, shame.

Posted By: Jackie stoopid again - 10/30/03 02:37 AM
So--is *a* the actual definition?

Posted By: consuelo Re: stoopid again - 10/30/03 02:50 AM
That be the one, Miz Jackie

Posted By: tsuwm Re: wangary: results - 10/30/03 03:01 AM
>I didn't really think you would stoop low enough to award *yourself my vote.

well then, whom should I have given it to?! or, to put it more obliquely, giving your vote away to the hogmaster is akin to handing the election over to the supreme court.

Posted By: Faldage Re: wangary: results - 10/30/03 11:44 AM
whom should I have given it to?

Had you been rigidly impartial you could have refused the honor.

Posted By: sjmaxq Re: wangary: results - 10/30/03 05:16 PM
>Had you been rigidly impartial you could have refused the honor.

That's an idea you need to pitch more loudly.

Posted By: Faldage Re: wangary: results - 10/30/03 05:28 PM
pitch more loudly

This from someone who thinks the pitch is the place on the pitch where the ball pitches?

Posted By: sjmaxq Re: wangary: results - 10/30/03 05:35 PM
>This from someone who thinks the pitch is the place on the pitch where the ball pitches?

Nope, from someone who thinks the pitch is the place on the wicket where the ball pitches before it hits the wicket.

Posted By: Faldage Re: wangary: results - 10/30/03 05:38 PM
Now, now. Aunt Fanny says that use of the term is incorrect. You wouldn't be calling Aunt Fanny a liar, now, would you?

Posted By: tsuwm Re: wangary: results - 10/30/03 05:39 PM
wangary:

x) pitch leg before wicket, but not googly

Posted By: sjmaxq Re: wangary: results - 10/30/03 06:04 PM
>You wouldn't be calling Aunt Fanny a liar, now, would you?

Perish the thought

© Wordsmith.org