Wordsmith.org
Posted By: Jackie Jodphurs - 07/11/05 01:43 AM
I noticed that somebody misspelled this word over in W & F, and that reminded me that I've been meaning to ask this, anyway: were these riding pants named after the city or State in India that is mentioned in the book I've been reading? Only it is spelled Jodhpur; but I was wondering if this was the style there, perhaps? I can't imagine how something spelled Jodhpur got to be pronounced jod-furs.

Posted By: sjmaxq Re: Jodphurs - 07/11/05 01:52 AM
The city is Jodhpur, the trousers worn by the unspeakable in pursuit of the inedible are, apparently, jodphurs
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jodhpur
The Wikipedia article gives the spelling of the name in devanagari as well, showing the "dh" before the "p".

Posted By: tsuwm Re: Jodphurs - 07/11/05 05:10 AM
try putting jod*urs into OneLook; the only spelling that comes up is jodhpurs -- or were you saying that jodphurs is the misspelling?

Posted By: Vernon Compton Re: Jodphurs - 07/11/05 05:18 AM
If jodphurs is a misspelling of the trousers, it's a very common one, according to Google.

Posted By: tsuwm Re: Jodphurs - 07/11/05 05:30 AM
FTR,
jodhpurs 86000+
jodphurs 21000+

Posted By: Buffalo Shrdlu Re: Jodhpurs - 07/11/05 11:23 AM
> something spelled Jodhpur got to be pronounced jod-furs.

because it's not?

'jäd-(")p&r

Posted By: of troy Re: Jodphurs - 07/11/05 12:13 PM
the proper way to say the City name? (Jodhpur) i don't know.

but --that rhetorical term-- (i remember it begins with a m.. i have gotten that far) for switching letters positions in a word?-- well, that process seems to be in play. (and the process where we make a foreign word look and sound like english.)

Jodhpur--quickly becomes jodphur-- and we all know how to 'say' ph(where as dhp doesn't seem to flow smoothly from the tongue!)
and so we get Jod-fur's

and in the US, only a handful are aware that there even is a city named Jodhpur!

Posted By: Jackie Re: Jodphurs - 07/11/05 01:27 PM
were you saying that jodphurs is the misspelling? No, dag nab it! I was trying to get people to throw up their hands in horror, and squawk, "You're wrong! You're wrong! The prrropah way of spelling it is of course...". Dag-gone--have you all been infected with niceness, or something?

JFTR, when I googled the two versions before posting, I got something like jodhpurs 83,000 and jodphurs 23,000.

aware that there even is a city named Jodhpur! Well, I wouldn't have been had it not been for that book; which is really why I decided to read it. I know very little about India and even less about her history. I have been trying to discover exactly how it was that England came to take it over, and am having only marginal success.

Oh--I just reminded myself of another question: a couple of times in the book, I have seen ref.'s to an amount of...Rupees?, for ex.: R 1,50,000. Can anybody tell me how many 1,50,000 of anything is? That first comma has me bumfuzzled.




Posted By: AnnaStrophic metathesis - 07/11/05 02:38 PM
Is that what you're looking for, Helen?

Posted By: of troy Re: metathesis - 07/11/05 06:58 PM
yeah--that's it --metathesis.. the process where brid becomes bird, and pretty, purty.

ouroburus has sunk into my brain (i posted the word 2 different times as one i had never heard of before that happened) and memathisis will sink in too..


Posted By: Elizabeth Creith Re: metathesis - 07/11/05 08:12 PM
Great word! thanks, AnnaS! Of course, my warped little brain wonders if a metathesis (with the emPHAsis on the wrong sylLAble) is kinda like a unified field theory...

Posted By: sjmaxq Re: Jodphurs - 07/11/05 08:17 PM
In reply to:

Oh--I just reminded myself of another question: a couple of times in the book, I have seen ref.'s to an amount of...Rupees?, for ex.: R 1,50,000. Can anybody tell me how many 1,50,000 of anything is? That first comma has me bumfuzzled.


My first thought was that it might have been a reference to 1 crore, 50 lakhs, but I couldn't explain the other zeros. Here's another possibility. Maybe there's a zero missing from the number, so that it should be Rs 1,500,000. Just a stab in the dark, of course. Where's my Radha when I need her?

Posted By: Faldage Re: Jodphurs - 07/12/05 12:06 AM
we all know how to 'say' ph

And, as eta so ably demonstrated, we would all be wrong. Being how as it's from an Indian language it's an aspirated unvoiced bilabial plosive and not an unvoiced labio-dental fricative.

Posted By: Elizabeth Creith Re: Jodphurs - 07/12/05 12:08 AM
Being how as it's from an Indian language it's an aspirated unvoiced bilabial plosive and not an unvoiced labio-dental fricative.
Easy for you to say!

Posted By: sjmaxq Re: Jodphurs - 07/12/05 05:08 AM
In reply to:

And, as eta so ably demonstrated, we would all be wrong. Being how as it's from an Indian language it's an aspirated unvoiced bilabial plosive and not an unvoiced labio-dental fricative.


I never could wrap my neuron around all that stuff, but, even though there is no "ph" of any sort in the name of the city in Rajasthan, here's a page devoted entirely to the Hindi ph(s)
http://maxqnzs.com/ph.html

P.S. That's a native speaker, not me.

Posted By: of troy Re: Jodphurs - 07/12/05 12:47 PM
re:--And, as eta so ably demonstrated, we would all be wrong. Being how as it's from an Indian language it's an aspirated unvoiced bilabial plosive and not an unvoiced labio-dental fricative.

Yeah, but... i did point out that 'hobson-jobson' was also a factor. (only i forgot the term hobsom-jobsom) and just pointed out "there is a tendency to make 'foriegn words' into more english friendly words".

and then transposing dhp (a sound, no doubt i could learn to make) inot a d-ph -a sound i already know how to make, is not unusual. no matter what spelling i encountered, i suspect i would say jod-fur--

if my audience was mostly desi, i would recognize that i was saying it wrong, but i don't know, (unless i was addressing a delegation from the city of Jodhpur) that i would make the effort to learn to say the city name differently than the clothing name.

(and i encounter people all the time who fail to realize the NY street, and texas city have different names--even if they are spelled the same way... )

Hobson-jobson ism has mangle many names over the ages.. its not just english speakers that engage in it.
(see www.engrish.com)










Posted By: Buffalo Shrdlu Re: Jodphurs - 07/12/05 01:00 PM
I have never heard anyone pronounce it with an F.

Posted By: of troy Re: Jodphurs - 07/12/05 01:24 PM
and i have never heard it any way but jodphur (jod-fur's)!

i was (since when, i don't know, but for along time) aware that the word was an indian(hindi?) one.. and even aware it was a city.. but if presented with a map of india, and major cities marked.. i don't know that i could correctly label one Jodhpur.. but i think (-really more of WAG-) that its in the north west..sort of corner..

Posted By: Buffalo Shrdlu Re: Jodphurs - 07/12/05 01:31 PM
heh.

I didn't know that it was an Indian city, I guess, until this discussion.

Posted By: Sparteye Re: Jodphurs - 07/12/05 02:20 PM
and i have never heard it any way but jodphur (jod-fur's)!

Well, now I'm curious whether the "jodfurs" pronunciation is regional. I've never heard of jodhpurs with an "eff" sound, and New York isn't all that far from Michigan. People from areas surrounding New York: how are you used to hearing this word pronounced?

Posted By: nancyk Re: Jodphurs - 07/12/05 06:01 PM
I'm with you, Ann. Until this thread, I never even thought of it, although I can see how the hp could migrate into the more familiar ph. Interesting.

Posted By: AnnaStrophic Re: Jodphurs - 07/12/05 07:28 PM
Me, too. I pronounce it with your regular old /p/. But I'm from a lot of places so I don't fit the statistical model.

Posted By: sjmaxq Re: Jodphurs - 07/12/05 08:28 PM
In reply to:

and then transposing dhp (a sound, no doubt i could learn to make)


Actually, you already do. In my Hindi textbooks, the sound is described as being analagous to that produced in the phrase and how.

As for "if my audience was mostly desi," I wouldn't worry about that too much. Deis differ on how to say that word itself. Some say "deshi", others "desi". There's nothing particularly difficult about the name of Jodhpur. Just aspirate the d (which is dental, not retroflex), and you'll be pretty much on the money.

Posted By: Jackie Re: Jodphurs - 07/12/05 08:55 PM
Do you-all mean to tell me that you pronounce it "jod-pers"??? That is really weird, to me: I have never heard it as anything but jod-furs.

As to money, I found in the book where a daughter got "an allowance of a lakh (1,00,000) of rupees a year." And another place, where "the wedding preparations--costing Rs 3,50,000 ...". I don't care what they are of: how many is 3,50,000?

(Heh heh--I am waiting to get slapped by whomever I accused of misspelling jodhpurs; but they can't, yet, 'cause then I'll know who wrote that definition!)

Posted By: sjmaxq Re: Jodphurs - 07/12/05 09:18 PM
Here's a question I asked on your behalf in a forum frequented by speakers of Indian English:
In reply to:

Is this a simple case of a leading zero being omitted, so that 3,50,000 is what would be written elsewhere as 3,050,000? Remember, she is not concerned with what the units are, she is trying to understand how many they are. Thanks.


Posted By: sjmaxq Re: Just for a lakh - 07/12/05 09:57 PM
Here's the thread in which I posed that question:
http://snipurl.com/g7nc-mq42

Posted By: Vernon Compton Re: Jodphurs - 07/12/05 10:18 PM
As a kid, I used to see it written jodphur about as often as jodhpur, but it was always pronounced jodper, never jodfer. fwiw.

Posted By: Buffalo Shrdlu Re: Jodphurs - 07/12/05 10:24 PM
yuhp.

Posted By: maverick Re: Jodphurs - 07/12/05 11:37 PM
As a yuthd I allus saw it written jodhpurs and pronounced as JOD-pers or JOD-pahs.

Posted By: Jackie Re: Just for a lakh - 07/13/05 12:59 AM
Thanks. Wow, and here I'd been thinking that numbers were the same pretty much everywhere.

Posted By: wow Re: Just for a lakh - 07/14/05 01:15 PM
In 1937, when I was about eight, :0 I learned to ride horses and Mother outfitted me with my very own boots and Jod-fahs! A loooong A - we spoke Bostonian after all!
Dad provided the history and the India connection.
One thing about those tan, twill riding pants is that they have no seam on the "inside leg" to chafe the inner thigh and vey comfy overall for riding. De rigueur in for riding in those days!
When the U.S. Army Cavalry had horses (instead of tanks and helicopters) the uniform for officers included jodphurs
Don't know about the enlisted - I am going by an old photo of my Uncle who was an officer in the Cavalry.

Here's a photo of a designer's exageratd version
http://www.style.com/fashionshows/stylehunter/slideshow/062904HUNT?play=false&iphoto=1
for modern versions take a look at a UK site
http://www.discounthorsetack.co.uk/
Posted By: shanks Not Radha, but... - 07/14/05 09:36 PM
100,000 in Hindi is one lakh. (A crore, for what it's worth, is 10,000,000.)

So Rs 1,50,000 is one-and-a-half lakhs. Hindi has a specific word for one-and-a-half: dheid (or similar - try transcribing non-existent sounds in English into Roman script.) Also for two-and-a-half: ddhaii.

In the old days ("when I were a lad") a lakh of Rupees was a lot of money and to describe someone as possessing more than a lakh (making him a "lakhpati") was the equivalent to the millionaire of the 1930s in Hollywood-speak.

These days even a crore-pati (pronounced approx: karodpathi) isn't any great shakes. Hardly surprising, given that the Indian Rupee is worth about two cents (American) and the Pakistani, Bangladeshi, Nepali and Sri Lankan versions (most called variants on Rupee or Rupaiyah) seem to be worth even less.

Jodhpur: A city in Rajasthan, probably a centre for polo during the Raj, hence lending its name to the leggings, most conventionally with huge flappy bits around the thighs, used for riding.

Jodphur: an unpronounceable abomination.

cheer

the sunshine warrior

e&oe

Posted By: tsuwm Re: Not Radha, but... - 07/14/05 09:45 PM
shanks, old hand!!

you dasn't get away with a ten-month lacuna in posting without generating some notice. where ya been?

Posted By: Buffalo Shrdlu Re: Not Radha, but... - 07/14/05 10:13 PM
good to see you here, shanks.

Posted By: sjmaxq Re: Not Radha, but... - 07/14/05 10:59 PM
Thanks, shanks. For a Spurs fan, you come perilously close to being a decent, helpful human being. Thanks for the movie tips, too.

Posted By: Faldage Re: Not Radha, but... - 07/14/05 11:09 PM
Welcome home, Ravi!

Posted By: Avy Re: Not Radha, but... - 07/15/05 08:08 AM
Hi Ravi!!! Good to have you back, my friend. Now that you are here, don't go anywhere, okay?

Thou tiest thyself up not (knot?) in thine own words. :)


Posted By: Jackie Re: Not Radha, but... - 07/16/05 03:22 PM
Ra-vee, love: how wonderful to see you again! :-)))

Posted By: wow Re: Not Radha, but... - 07/18/05 02:10 PM
Namaste Ravi, welcome home!

© Wordsmith.org