Wordsmith.org
Posted By: of troy underwater - 09/25/03 02:32 PM
last night, on jay leno's tonight show, the guest Rob Lowe talked about a vacation trip, taken the previous week, and he said "We scubadived with sharks"

Jay questioned "scubadived?" and asked if there was an english teacher in the audience.

so what's the answer? dived? dove?


Posted By: dxb Re: underwater - 09/25/03 02:53 PM
I reckon 'dived' is correct. Dove is for the birds.

Posted By: Jackie Re: underwater - 09/25/03 03:33 PM
Gurunet went straight to Google (which means the word isn't in its dictionary), where there were 106 sites where the word scubadived was used. I reckon it must be like when we say a baseball batter flied out.

Posted By: Faldage Re: underwater - 09/25/03 06:50 PM
As usual, dxb is right. As this Usage Note from AHD4 shows (http://www.bartleby.com/61/11/D0301100.html) both forms are presently accepted but the weak form, dived is the original, at least working from the OE verb, dyfan. The other verb mentioned, dufan was strong; the first preterite would have been deafan, however *that would have transmorgrified in MnE.

Posted By: wsieber Re: underwater - 09/26/03 05:59 AM
If you do the search with the separated or hyphenated words (scuba-dived) you even get 1860 hits. I think the unusual thing is to fuse the two.

Posted By: Bingley Re: underwater - 09/26/03 07:08 AM
>>so what's the answer? dived? dove?

We went scubadiving

Bingley
Posted By: Faldage Re: separated or hyphenated words - 09/26/03 10:31 AM
Often separate words in a bound phrase pass through a hyphenated stage on the way to becoming a single word. Cf. Base ball, base-ball, baseball.

Posted By: Capfka Re: separated or hyphenated words - 09/27/03 09:20 PM
This is, as Faldo the catowner pointed out, one of those situations where the past tense of a weak verb looks wrong but isn't. Personally, I would take the trouble to break it out into a form which didn't put me in the position of having to make a choice by adjectivising the verb - "I went scuba diving". A kind of imperfect perfect tense, if you will. Well, better than the alternative tenses anyway. "I scuba dived" or "I scuba dove" just sounds (and feels) awkward.

Posted By: Bingley Re: separated or hyphenated words - 09/27/03 10:58 PM
Can one chop liver underwater?

Bingley
Posted By: moss Re: underwater but not descending - 09/28/03 06:57 PM
so what's the answer? dived? dove?

Strictly speaking, the answer is neither.

SCUBA stands for "Self-Contained Underwater Breathing Apparatus".

You can use it in shallow water, or simply by floating face-down as with a snorkle.

When using a snorkle, one does not snorkle-dive. You go snorkling.

Lowe should have said "We SCUBAed with sharks".

In the present tense, one says "Let's SCUBA", just as one would say "Let's Bomba".

Posted By: sjmaxq Re: underwater but not descending - 09/28/03 07:41 PM
>In the present tense, one says "Let's SCUBA", just as one would say "Let's Bomba".

Or, if one is using the common NZ usage, one simply says "diving". The "scuba" is understood, and the only time a qualifier is used is if the diving in question is free diving, i.e., not using scuba equipment.

Posted By: Faldage Re: underwater but not descending - 09/28/03 07:51 PM
use it in shallow water

The scubadiving depth record seems to be around 2300'

http://www.scubaboard.com/t33337/sc957ff02a8dbc8d8389ac1684cb6aa46.html

Posted By: moss Re: underwater but not descending - 09/28/03 10:07 PM
The scubadiving depth record seems to be around 2300'

Useful link, Faldage. Thank you.

But somewhat self-defeating if you are defending the use of "scubadiving", is it not?

The title at the top of the page you linked us to reads "SCUBA Depth Record".

The "diving", in "Scuba-diving", probably dates to a time when the sport was young. Rather like "horseless carriage" which eventually became "car".



Posted By: Faldage Re: underwater but not descending - 09/28/03 11:00 PM
self-defeating if you are defending the use of "scubadiving"

Or either you could have read the posts and noticed that, in the first four posts, by four different posters, the word dive in one form or another is used at least five times.

As a newly certified diver…

…the navy using scuba divers…

***

So far the deepest dives (2300')…

***

…the divers in the link you posted…

***

from GUE's "Getting Clear on the Basics: The Fundamentals of Technical Diving" book


But that would probably have been too much trouble.

Posted By: moss Re: underwater but not descending - 09/30/03 12:16 AM
But that would probably have been too much trouble

Never too much trouble to remind ourselves that language evolves, and some who use it do not.

No offence, of course.


Posted By: Faldage Re: underwater but not descending - 09/30/03 01:34 PM
remind ourselves that language evolves, and some who use it do not.


Yeah, you're probably right. Still, it's a shame that all those folks who actually do it haven't figured out that you have decided that the use of the term dive is no longer necessary.

On the bright side, it's good to see that you have come around to the majority opinion concerning the difference between snorkels and scuba gear.

Posted By: musick Bubbling (or maybe burping) aloud - 09/30/03 08:46 PM
I'm still working on what BOMBA stands for...

Battle over musical...?... Burning old mopeds...?... Bringing out more bloody ale?



Posted By: Buffalo Shrdlu Re: Bubbling (or maybe burping) aloud - 09/30/03 09:19 PM
Bite Old Moss's Big A...

oops...

Posted By: paulb Re: Bomba - 10/01/03 10:08 AM
Here you go, Musick

www.bomba.com.au

[My youngest son, Phil, was with them for a few years]

To see what he's doing now:

philneet.customer.netspace.net.au/index.html

[Information supplied by proud father!]

Posted By: Jackie Re: Bomba - 10/01/03 10:50 AM
http://www.bomba.com.au
http://philneet.customer.netspace.net.au/index.html
Clickability happily supplied by proud father's friend!

Posted By: Buffalo Shrdlu Re: Bomba - 10/01/03 08:33 PM
cool, Paul!

© Wordsmith.org