Wordsmith.org
Posted By: dalehileman NYT's omission - 10/27/09 08:00 PM
The New York Times recently quit using the apostrophe with an abbreviation (eg, DVDs) though I had always considered its use as virtually mandatory, but changes taking place in the media and popular culture overwhelm my traditional understanding of usage in the Mother Tongue

For instance the stylebook for our local Fourth Estate, The Victorville, CA Daily Press, evidently allows for the interchange of "lay" and "lie," where more than once we have noted a usage like, "...a woman laying beside the road..."

While the traditional scholar might anticipate the imminent arrest of the woman on grounds of indecent exposure, the new usage is no doubt meant to allay the possible assumption that she is instead seated curbside using a cellphone to spread rumors and untruths

Eg, lying beside the highway

In the Press' defense, however, to lay is doubtless becoming widespread as we have also noted the occasional laying even in AP stories. By coincidence in today's Press , "The victim had drank a large amount of alcohol...." Perhaps the woman was laying there because she had drank so much, suggesting another linguistic twist in a parallel vein (no puns intended)
Posted By: doc_comfort Re: NYT's omission - 10/28/09 12:48 AM
Originally Posted By: dalehileman
The New York Times recently quit using the apostrophe with an abbreviation


I could never work out why there was an apostrophe there in the first place.
Posted By: Faldage Re: NYT's omission - 10/28/09 10:09 AM
There are times when it is helpful, but, as a general rule, I leave it out. How many is are there in the previous sentence?
Posted By: tsuwm Re: NYT's omission - 10/28/09 01:40 PM
Originally Posted By: Faldage
There are times when it is helpful, but, as a general rule, I leave it out. How many is are there in the previous sentence?


I count four(4) is; but there is only one Is.
-joe (ambiguity are our friend) friday
Posted By: Buffalo Shrdlu Re: NYT's omission - 10/28/09 01:51 PM
I got five, though one is a bit uppity. and one is.
Posted By: twosleepy Re: NYT's omission - 10/29/09 03:01 AM
Nope. There's only one...
Posted By: Faldage Re: NYT's omission - 10/29/09 11:28 AM
There's no I in TEAM, but there is in WIN.
© Wordsmith.org