|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 2,788
Carpal Tunnel
|
OP
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 2,788 |
In describing how I reproduced an address error in replying to an e-mail sent to me as part of a group address, I explained that I highlit the message received, smushed "reply to all" and wrote my response above the header. Immediately I heard back from one of the recipients that I misused the word "highlit". If "highlit" is not the past participle of "to highlight" then what is? And why?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 7,210
Carpal Tunnel
|
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 7,210 |
I would probably say highlighted, but that's lousy, too...
formerly known as etaoin...
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,065
Carpal Tunnel
|
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,065 |
I would go for highlighted as well. Steven Pinker has a lot to say about this, but as most of his examples were taken from baseball, I may have misunderstood.
Bingley
Bingley
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 91
journeyman
|
|
journeyman
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 91 |
My dictionary told me it's highlighted. It's an English-Chinese dictionary, though.
I’m learning English. If u find anywhere I can improve my composition, Pls do let me know. Bow.
Do inform me if you see any corrections needed in my written English. 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 2,788
Carpal Tunnel
|
|
OP
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 2,788 |
Google for "highlit" = 5,430 English pages.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Carpal Tunnel
|
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803 |
I get 5,840 for highlit. Highlighted gets 27,100,000. I think Pinker's point was that verbs with recently derived meanings, e.g. a batter flying out, and newly built verbs, e.g. highlight, are regular even if the root verb is irregular. AHD lists only the regular past: http://www.bartleby.com/61/70/H0197000.html
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 114
member
|
|
member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 114 |
If "highlit" is not the past participle of "to highlight" then what is? And why?
Your use of "highlit" assumes that "highlight", because it contains the root word "light", can and should be treated as though it is the same as the word "light" standing alone.
But the "light" in the word "highlight" is used metaphorically, and the 'lighting' is done, not with electricity or combustion, but with a "highlighter" which deposits a yellow smear, or smear of another color, which 'highlights' selected text.
Thus, "highlight" is a new word which is not bound by the variations appropriate to the word "light" standing alone.
"Highlighted" is used in preference to "highlit", not only because it sounds more fluid [please excuse the pun], but also because "lit" places undue emphasis on the literal meaning of the root word "light".
Of course, there is no absolute right or wrong to this, Father Steve. The general prejudice in favor of "highlighted" is intuitive, not canonical.
|
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics13,913
Posts229,328
Members9,182
| |
Most Online3,341
Dec 9th, 2011
|
|
|
0 members (),
756
guests, and
0
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
