Wordsmith.org: the magic of words

Wordsmith Talk

About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us  

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 3 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
#99565 03/29/03 10:38 PM
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,624
Pooh-Bah
Offline
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,624
Hummph!®

Doesn't count, and you know it! Stringfellow's effort had strings attached, if you know what I mean.

Actually, Richard Pearse was a real clever sod, and the flying thingy was actually just a sideline. He built a bicycle which was years ahead of its time, he found a way of making traction engines much more efficient and came up with a whole host of other inventions.

But for all that he had absolutely no commercial nous (witness the fact that he flew his plane without publicity. But there is no doubt at all that he beat the Wright brothers to it by about nine months and possibly nearly 18 months.

He never took out a single patent. Idiot!

- Pfranz

#99566 03/31/03 02:56 AM
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,289
B
veteran
Offline
veteran
B
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,289
The Coast Guard sailing ship is the Eagle


#99567 03/31/03 04:23 PM
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,692
D
dxb Offline
Pooh-Bah
Offline
Pooh-Bah
D
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,692
Getting back to the booze, does anyone know the strength of these alcoholic drinks that sailors apparently imbibed with such reckless abandon? I have heard of something called 'small beer', which has become part of a well known phrase or saying for instance. That suggests to me that there is a possibility that the drinks were of lower strength than we are used to today.

Of course, since the water was so bad they may have been boiling off the alcohol by using it for cooking. No, seriously.


#99568 03/31/03 04:48 PM
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,189
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,189
Good point, dxb. From what I understand, originally beer only contained about 4% alcohol, thus even children could drink it as nourishment without any serious inebriate effects. And it wasn't until the latter part of the 19th century that innkeepers began to ferment beer to a higher potency (proof) for recreational imbibing.


#99569 03/31/03 05:12 PM
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,296
W
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
W
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,296
Why 'proof' for alcoholic content? What does it prove other than about how drunk you'll get if you drink more ounces of a higher proof alcohol than a lower one?


#99570 04/01/03 12:41 AM
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 866
stales Offline OP
old hand
OP Offline
old hand
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 866
Thanks to the U of Wyoming for the following:

" Proof refers to the percentage of ethyl alcohol by volume in any particular type of alcoholic beverage. Proof corresponds to twice the percentage rate. For example, a bottle of whiskey may be 80 proof or 40% alcohol by volume."

So now ya know!

stales


#99571 04/01/03 03:25 AM
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 618
D
addict
Offline
addict
D
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 618
So why is it double the percentage?


#99572 04/01/03 04:01 AM
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 866
stales Offline OP
old hand
OP Offline
old hand
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 866
Doc

I'm tempted to say it's because it's American and therefore overstated - like the "World" series - but I won't.

Can't get an explicit statement as to why, but the site below gives a hint. "Proof spirit" in the US is said to be 100 Proof - gives one a decimal to work with. Pure alcohol (which one doesn't/shouldn't drink) is 200 Proof.

Of course the Poms have to be different - their pure alcohol is 175.25 proof.

http://www.sasky.com/saskycom/databases/spirits/index3

As regards the word Proof, it was apparently first used in the 17th century by whiskey dealers. Unscrupulous dealers used to add water to their whiskey to increase their profits, so to combat this, whiskey was tested by pouring a sample onto some gunpowder and setting it alight. If the gunpowder ignited after the alcohol had burned off, it was proof that the whiskey had not contained too much water.

One can assume from this that a 50% ethanol / 50% water mix (ie 100 Proof) is the minimum blend that will not affect gunpowder's ability to burn after a soaking.


stales


#99573 04/01/03 07:07 AM
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,296
W
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
W
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,296
How do you go about lighting wet gunpowder?


#99574 04/01/03 07:20 AM
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,624
Pooh-Bah
Offline
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,624
How do you go about lighting wet gunpowder?

Carefully, I'd say!

- Pfranz

Page 3 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Moderated by  Jackie 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics13,913
Posts229,318
Members9,182
Most Online3,341
Dec 9th, 2011
Newest Members
Ineffable, ddrinnan, TRIALNERRA, befuddledmind, KILL_YOUR_SUV
9,182 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 781 guests, and 1 robot.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days)
Top Posters
wwh 13,858
Faldage 13,803
Jackie 11,613
tsuwm 10,542
wofahulicodoc 10,535
LukeJavan8 9,916
AnnaStrophic 6,511
Wordwind 6,296
of troy 5,400
Disclaimer: Wordsmith.org is not responsible for views expressed on this site. Use of this forum is at your own risk and liability - you agree to hold Wordsmith.org and its associates harmless as a condition of using it.

Home | Today's Word | Yesterday's Word | Subscribe | FAQ | Archives | Search | Feedback
Wordsmith Talk | Wordsmith Chat

© 1994-2024 Wordsmith

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5