|About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us|
You are not logged in. [Log In] Wordsmith.org » Forums » General Topics » Words and languages in schools » A home course in Astronomy Register User Forum List Calendar Active Topics Search FAQ
#97753 - 03/05/03 05:58 PM A home course in Astronomy
I suggested to etaoin, who is an astronmy enthusiast, that there are a lot of
interesting words to be learned about astronomy. Plato would not consider
anybody ignorant of geometry worthy of his company. Today, ignorance of
astronomy is worse. And I am ignorant of it. But I have found a place to Learn:
Here's a small sample from glossary at the site:
ecliptic & inclination
ecliptic, ecliptic plane
Hertzsprung-Russell Diagram, H-R Diagram
inverse square law
Kepler's first law
Kepler's Laws of Planetary Motion
Kepler's second law
Kepler's third law
Kerr black hole
#97754 - 03/05/03 07:05 PM Re: A home course in Astronomy
looks like a good site, Dr. Bill, with some good links. I did put one word down below the fold; it's gotten a little response._________________________
formerly known as etaoin...
#97755 - 03/05/03 08:27 PM Re: A home course in Astronomy
Dear etaoin: Don't get discouraged. It was quite a while before anyone looked at the words
I was posting in Beheaded Words. I'm really grateful a small but valued group has been looking
at them for past couple weeks. I think a lot of people get overwhelmed by the amount of
technical stuff you have to learn in astronomy. Maybe we can lure them in with some simple
beginnings. I'm so ignorant of astronomy it hurts. I hate being ignorant.
#97756 - 03/06/03 05:08 AM Re: A home course in Astronomy
Loc: Piedmont Region of Virginia, U...
Comment on Kepler: The most interesting aspect of reading about the development of astronomy is learning how each pivotal figure struggled with past theories, moved forward (sometimes) in an attempt to either refute or further develop those theories, and developed a theory which would eventually be disproven by others. Kepler realized that Copernicus's math was off, but the calculations could be made more accurate by showing that the planets moved in elliptical, rather than circular, orbits. However, Kepler based his theory on perfect elliptical orbits so his calculations remained slightly off. He had not calculated in the various planetary wobbles caused by the various gravitational pulls among the planets (and other bodies moving through the solar system)that led to variations in the elliptical orbits.
But these early astronomers are amazing in how they carried out their observations and worked calculations to support their theories--and without the aid of a telescope. Galileo was just up ahead of Kepler, but I must edit here: I don't know what effect Gallileo's telescope had on Kepler's math. [Did we have to wait for Newton to factor in gravitational pull of the planets upon each other?] Or any of the astronomers preceding Galileo. Of course, that's as much a waste of time to consider as adding twenty years to Mozart's life and trying to predict how his music may have developed.
Forum Stats 8835 Members
Max Online: 3341 @ 12/09/11 02:15 PM
Newest Members JimHarbor, treponim, Esmith, EvanescentBlue, Ashley
8835 Registered Users
Who's Online 0 registered (), 22 Guests and 3 Spiders online. Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters (30 Days)
endymion6 86 wofahulicodoc 79 LukeJavan8 71 A C Bowden 47 May 3 tsuwm 1
wwh 13858 Faldage 13803 Jackie 11613 tsuwm 10530 LukeJavan8 7359 Buffalo Shrdlu 7210 AnnaStrophic 6511 Wordwind 6296 wofahulicodoc 5717 of troy 5400
Board Rules · Mark all read Contact Us · Wordsmith.org · Top
Disclaimer: Wordsmith.org is not responsible for views expressed on this site. Use of this forum is at your own risk and liability - you agree to hold Wordsmith.org and its associates harmless as a condition of using it.
Home | Today's Word | Yesterday's Word | Subscribe | FAQ | Archives | Search | Feedback
Wordsmith Talk | Wordsmith Chat
© 2014 Wordsmith